THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN LEFT ON MY BLOG POST TITLED WARWICKSHIRE PAEDOPHILE JOURNALIST THOMAS O' CARROLL THE PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE (PIE)
Dear Zoompad, I have read a lot of your comments on many different sites, and generally I have a great deal of time for what you have to say. In connection with your comments on Anonymous' (not me) item, you are obviously aware that the comment is made by somebody who you would normally regard as a victim. You would not normally regard a victim's comments as being "pro paedo", would you? This particular comment, however rare it may be, in your opinion, is still a valid comment, and we do not know how many other "victims" there are who have all been through similar events and have emerged unscathed. There are questions where there is coercion, and rightly so, but this seems like a variation on the idea that all of us have to go through a homosexual phase in our teens, as this a part of normal growing up, and we are not a completely properly developed adult if this part of our development is missing. Sorry to mess with your neat and tidy ideas of what should and should not go on between on WARWICKSHIRE PAEDOPHILE JOURNALIST THOMAS O' CARROLL THE PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE (PIE)
16 comments:
HERE IS THE LINK
http://zoompad.blogspot.com/2012/03/warwickshire-paedophile-journalist.html?showComment=1367444443660#c8884231710961758436
I can only assume that this person is trying to falsely accuse me of the crime of crimes, the only crime that many police forces and human rights groups get upset about these days, homophobia.
I have said this many times but it doesn't seem to sink in to some peoples brains, so I will say it again. I DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT TWO MEN OR TWO WOMEN HAVING SEX, I REALLY DON'T CARE, ITS NONE OF MY BUSINESS, UNLESS THEY SHOVE IT IN MY FACE AND FORCE ME TO BE AN UNWILLING ONLOOKER TO THEIR PRIVATE SEX LIVES!
What I do care about, is that children should never be sexualised. Children should be allowed to have their innocent childhoods. Children don't need sex shoved down their throats from the rising of the sun to the setting of the sun.
I have a right to comment on that, as my own childhood was blighted by me being abused. I had my career choices wrecked and I am still suffering the fall out from that to this day. I was a bright, hard working girl, and I should have had good career prospects, but being a Pindown victim wrecked all that, and the cover ups and slander of my name - they called me Lolita and they made up psychiatric crap to blacken my character and made me unemployable and caused me to get PTSD and fat from comfort eating to quell the pain I felt inside.
SO DONT YOU COME HERE TRYING TO FCUK WITH MY MIND. YOU DARE TO ACCUSE ME OF HOMOPHOBIA. YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT I AM SAYING, AND YOUR SLY SNEAKY SKULKING WORD TWISTING WONT WASH HERE!
"all of us have to go through a homosexual phase in our teens, as this a part of normal growing up"
SEE HOW THEY SEXUALISE EVERYTHING?
THEY DON'T WANT ANY CHILD TO HAVE THEIR CAREFREE INNOCENCE.
THEN, ONCE THEY HAVE USED THE CHILD, THE CHILD GETS CALLED A PUTDOWN NAME, IE LOLITA, AND PUT ON THE DISCARD PILE.
it is NOT true that we go througha homosexual phase in our teens, this was put about by kinsey to establish a lowering of morals.
I yself have hurreidly writteen things and then afterwards when reading it thought, i could have explained that better
could this be one of those times ?
my next door neighbour was on local radio ina talk about pedophiles
an she was quite outspoken, this week she has had several nasty calles from jewish people, why do they hate us ?
whats going on here ?
let me say here and now and shout it from the rooftops
I AM HOMOPHOBIC
i was absued by a brutal male teacher at school, later i became a christian and try to live by the good book, christianity in the bible says same sex acts are wrong and damaging,
i know how it damaged me
so lets say this all together
WE ARE HOMOPHOBIC
david lambert
I SHOULD be homophobic, according to the Bible, but I'm not, I never have been. I just can't bring myself to hate anyone for falling in love with someone of the same sex.
The Bible says its wrong for two people of the same sex to have sex with each other, but as far as I can see, that is between those people and God, not me.
But what happened to you David, thats not two grown up adults choosing to have a loving relationship, that is a pervert using his trusted position to bully a child into an illegal relationship.
The paedos are trying to entrap us all David, and I'm not having it. They're trying to entrap us into breaking the new "homophobic" law which they have supported in their crafty plan to make it legal for them to have sex with children. They dont actually care about homosexuals in loving relationships by mutual consent - they pretend to, but thats not their agenda at all.
"it is NOT true that we go througha homosexual phase in our teens, this was put about by kinsey to establish a lowering of morals."
ABSOLUTLY!!!!
"I yself have hurreidly writteen things and then afterwards when reading it thought, i could have explained that better
could this be one of those times ?"
Thats what I was wondering, and why I reposted the comment here.
Looking at it in context though, it doesn't look like that to me. It looks like more of the paedo bailing to me, because the paedos favourite trick is to entrap victims and whistleblowers to saying or doing something that they can set the police onto them for. Thats because theres lawyers, politicians and chiefs of police in the paedo gang - these bastards are involved in creating the very laws that they use against their victims and anyone who tries to help them.
The Lord My Moneygrubber fiasco was a good example of that in action.
Sorry, typo, I meant paedo baiting.
it was rockefella who paid kinsey to distort his sex studies in favour of pedophilia, because this is the agenda
i did not understand why the jews were saying anti-pedophilia campagning was anti-semitic, but a jewish workmate tole me in the jewish holy books its ok as non jews dont have a soul, they are only animals, i dont know much about religion but this seems wrong to me ?
and i t still think pedophilia is wrong too !
Mark Terrell
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10037911/Deputy-Speaker-Nigel-Evans-arrested-on-suspicion-of-rape.html
news today conservative homosexual politician rapes two young boys
Just as a comment to the article that is a comment, and not all these stories in comments to the comment that was an article:
Some victims become abusers, and than get a password to the Old boys Network.
Further now an effort to take away certain small worries by Zoompad:
Although homosexuals and pedophiles get some feedback here on the problems they create, and might create, fat woman are very much appreciated by some men. Fat woman are often nicer, have more sense of humor, have less undeserved high esteem of themselves. And bigger ...
At any case, some men like them fat, and why you think being fat it is a problem in society, it is not so for all men. Not for me that is. I wonder than how women would be bullying each other about such a thing maybe? What turns me off in woman, is mostly these stupid looking earrings and other piercings, make-up hiding their real face that I love, and rude behavior they may in their ignorance believe is macho. And age has it's charm, but older women do not have as much luxury to behave, as ignorant as younger women can allow themselves to behave. The advantage older woman have, is the gained wisdom, especially if have been a mother. More empathy, understanding, love without illusions.
I myself am a heterofile, as may had been understood already... Normal, I suppose.
Bosgeus,
I think I know what you're saying, and if I'm right, thats very kind of you.
But I got clinically obese because I used food as a comforter to mask the pain that I felt inside of me, from the abuse I suffered as a child, and the reabuse from people who are hell bent determined to cover it up by systematically smashing up the lives of Pindown victims. I didn't realise the hateful thing they were doing for decades, all I knew is that every time I tried to shake free of my horrid past something was always there to stop me, no matter how hard I tried. That was before I understood about Malicious Vindictive Persecution, and the systematic reabuse by MI Paedo of the care home Pindown children, and the media's involvement with the Military Secret Services.
I just assumed I was cursed by God, and that is why I ended up gorging myself on high calorific foods even when I wasn't hungry. I know now that I am certainly not the only Pindown victim that has done this, far from it.
By God's grace, I have survived, and I am not clinically obese any more. Its very kind of you, what you are saying, thank you, but I certainly never ever want to be struggling to walk up and down the stairs on account of my weight ever again, I am on a calorie controlled diet and am determined to shed the rest of the weight I put on from comfort eating, and to get myself as fit as I possibly can, for my age, the same as Stuart Syvret has done - actually, the way he has responded to the vile disgusting way the paedos have treated him is an inspiration to me.
I owe it to myself and to God to look after my own health as well as I can, and thats what I intend to do.
Let me state right here at the outset that I am the "anonymous" who wrote the original comment that has now become a page in its own right.
Firstly, I never accused anybody of being homophobic, as hating somebody based on who they love is as silly as hating somebody because of what they believe, or do not believe in, or hating somebody for the colour of their hair, or hating somebody for their weight, etc.
I am truly shocked that Zoompad has responded to my comment in such a violent way. "Trying to fcuk with my mind". "Sly, sneaky, skulking word-twisting."
I was very reluctant to even reply, if this is the sort of response my comment is going to get. However, I would like to put the record straight. What my comment was about was Zoompad's, what I believed over-reaction to another comment on her page, where another "anonymous", not me, had incurred her wrath by daring to suggest that they had had a sexual encounter as a child, with an older person, and had emerged, by their own statement unscathed, implying that a lot of reaction in similar situations is often imposed from outside, in terms of the reaction that we are "supposed" to have.
Having said that, I had hoped, but obviously failed, to make clear that the sort of situation that you, Zoompad, have been through is precisely NOT what I was referring to. I thought that I had made it clear that where there is coercion, or, as in your case, physical violence towards another person, then that is a totally different situation.
I hope that you can now see what I meant to convey. If, however, you are still angry with me, then other readers of this page will just have to make up their own minds.
I certainly did not try to give the impression that you were running a site on which anybody who disagreed with your point of view would immediately be shot down in flames, and it was only my seeking to protect another anonymous, who had incurred your wrath by their comment, that seems to have prompted your outburst against me.
I state now, for the record, that I am utterly against any form of cover-up by the powers-that-be of any sort of cruelty or ill treatment to anybody, be they child or adult. Please understand that trying to make you see beyond your own experience, is not the same thing as decrying what you must have gone through. This is especially so, in my case, as I had no idea of your own history until I read your response to my comment.
I now feel that I have said enough to show clearly that I had no intention of trying to offend anybody, least of all you, when I simply offered an alternative point of view to yours, and certainly did not expect the violent and abusive reply my comment got.
I'm not angry with anyone who is trying to stop the child abuse and the cover ups and persecutions of victims of child abuse.
I'm not perfect, I do make mistakes, for example, I made a whopper of a mistake yesterday, falling for the horrible propaganda blox that was all over yesterdays news. So many of these little propaganda stage show stunts, and yet I still fell for this latest one! I am kicking myself today for being a mug.
So you see, I do make mistakes, I'm not God, I don't have an all seeing eye. The Freemasons dont either though, they just think they have, but the Bible tells us there are definatly more angels than fallen angels!
Don't be angry with me if I've lashed out unjustly, I am just doing my best
Hello, Zoompad, just me, THAT Anonymous again, for the last time. I have enough of a life in the real world (away from the internet) that it always takes me some time to go back to anywhere where I might have written some comment and see if there has been any response to it.
I totally accept your explanation for the misunderstanding that has happened between us, and I wish you every success as each of us tries, in our own way, to combat what we see as a topsy-turvey world.
Your blog is 1 of the few that I even bother to comment on, simply because many of them are run by obvious nutters, who only want to spout their own point of view and do not listen (or ban) anybody who dares to disagree with them.
The fight to get the truth out is much wider than child abuse alone, important though that is, and it is only possible to get things done if all of us concentrate on the bit that we are good at, or that interests us in particular.
Post a Comment