BUTLER SLOSS CALLED THIS VILE PAEDOPHILE A "VALUABLE AND IMPORTANT WITNESS"

THIS IS A REPOSTING FROM SPOTLIGHT ON ABUSE, THANKS TO THE PEOPLE THERE FOR THIS, I DIDNT REALISE UNDERWAGER HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN THE CLEVELAND CHILD ABUSE INVESTIGATION:


Baroness Butler-Sloss and her ‘valuable and important witness’

American ‘child abuse expert’ Ralph Underwager gave evidence, oral and written, to the Cleveland Child Abuse Inquiry in 1987 and was described by the chairman, Lord Justice Butler-Sloss as a “valuable and important witness.” In his oral evidence he asserted the following as proven by research:-

- Abused children are not secretive: cannot feel shame or embarrassment before the age of 9 or 11
- The recidivism rate for abusers is 1% to 2%
- Anal assault was the most rare and infrequent form of abuse and then only occurs with perpetrators who are “rather crazy”
- Abused children are not threatened
- 5% of claims of abuse are probably well founded, as judged by the conviction rate
- There is no therapeutic benefit in an abused child expressing their feelings afterwards to a psychiatrist. He said he regarded his views as mainstream.

Recently Dr Underwager said in an Internet exchange that he had treated victims of sexual abuse since 1953 and in all that time had never met one who blamed themselves for the abuse by thinking they had invited the abuse or was a bad person.

Ralph Underwager and his wife, Hollida Wakefield believe that “ill founded, intrusive, and destructive state intervention in the lives of families and individuals under the cloak of saving children from abuse is a serious widespread problem.”

(Accuracy About Abuse – Info Sheet 8, September 1995. By Marjorie Orr)


Ralph Underwager

Ralph Underwager was exposed by an interview he gave to a European paedophile magazine called Paidika, in which he said child sexual abuse was “God’s Will”.

Here are some extracts from the interview, which can be found here:

Underwager: Paedophiles can boldly and courageously affirm what they choose. They can say that what they want is to find the best way to love….Paedophiles can make the assertion that the pursuit of intimacy and love is what they choose. With boldness they can say, “I believe this is in fact part of God’s will

Paidika: Is choosing paedophilia for you a responsible choice for the individuals?


Underwager: Certainly it is responsible. What I have been struck by as I have come to know more about and understand people who choose paedophilia is that they let themselves be too much defined by other people. That is usually an essentially negative definition. Paedophiles spend a lot of time and energy defending their choice. I don’t think that a paedophile needs to do that. Paedophiles can boldly and courageously affirm what they choose. They can say that what they want is to find the best way to love. I am also a theologian and as a theologian, I believe it is God’s will that there be closeness and intimacy, unity of the flesh, between people. A paedophile can say: “This closeness is possible for me within the choices that I’ve made.”
Paedophiles are too defensive. They go around saying, “You people out there are saying that what I choose is bad, that it’s no good. You’re putting me in prison, you’re doing all these terrible things to me. I have to define my love as being in some way or other illicit.” What I think is that paedophiles can make the assertion that the pursuit of intimacy and love is what they choose. With boldness, they can say, “I believe this is in fact part of God’s will.” They have the right to make these statements for themselves as personal choices. Now whether or not they can persuade other people they are right is another matter (laughs).

See also: Ralph Underwager and the Cleveland child abuse inquiry

HARRIET HARMAN AND THE DELIBERATE COVER UP OF CHILD ABUSE AND PERSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE VICTIMS

I have a personal grievance with Harriet Harman, because I wrote to the MOJ many times while I was going through 7 years of being persecuted bullied and threatened (Richard Gardners "Threat Therapy) in the Secret Family Courts, and she is one of the people who the MOJ referred to wtite back to me.

I had discovered that what was being used against me in the secret family courts was PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME, and that had been invented by an American paedophile called Richard Gardner.

Harman and others from the MOJ lied to me, she told me that Parental Alienation Syndrome is not used in the UK, when she knew it was being used all over the UK, in secret family courts all over the UK. At the time, I had no idea of Harriet Harmans involvement with the Paedophile Information Exchange or the NCCL.

Harriet Harman did know not only that syndromes that had been invented by American paedophiles were being used all over the UK, she also knew that in 2005 200 women had been put into jail because of beng accused in secret courts of "Contempt of Court" and that is the charge PAS accused women are put in jail on when the judge uses Gardners "Threat Therapy" on them.

I hope Harriet Harman reads this post and decides to try to sue me, as I am a very angry women and would relish the prospect of a proper fight in a court of law, and this time it wouldnt be a secret one either. Harriet Harman and her creepy skulking crafty friends have blighted my life, and she knows it. Hearing people like Emily Thornberry praise Harriet Harman as some sort of advocate for womens rights is like hearing Thatcher praised as a champion of women, absolutly sickening. Not only did Harriet Harman and her colleagues in Parliament and the BBC make the UK a dangerous place to be a mother, they have turned the UK into a paedophiles paradise.

I also want to know why my son and his friends from a school for disabled students was taken to prison for PE lessons. Bill Cash and Jeremy Lefroy know all about that, so does Ian Parry, and I'm sure Harriet Harman is also fully aware of that sort of thing going on because all pigs feed from the same trough!

I've just realised that Emily Thornberry is Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury, so surely she herself must also be aware of the massive cover up of the abuse of childrens home children in Islington? But these people would rather all rally round one another defending the undefendable than lifting even the tip of their little finger to try to defend little children from the determined as hell paedophiles that prey on them!