I am making this post so that there will be an online record of how the man whom I have formally accused of raping me in a 3 hour video statement to Staffordshire Police at Blyth Bridge Police Station on Monday 12th June 2005 at 10.00am
Staffordshire Police are well aware of who this man is, so I won't name him here. They decided not to prosecute this man, and did not even have the courtesy of formally informing me, I found out by bumping into a local policeman in my town. I think it is a disgusting way to treat someone who has suffered not just rape but child abuse and illegal persecution in the secret family court, including a two hour kidnapping by two lawyers at Stafford County Court (my own legal team!), with the aforesaid rapist placed directly behind the door, with me crying and eventually screaming all that time, begging to be allowed to go. They were trying to force me to sign documents against my will.
Yesterday, I had a telephone call from my son's school. It was his headmaster, who has been head of that school for 22 years. I am not going to name him here either, because I do not want to draw any attention off criminals posing as public servants towards him. That might sound paranoid, but when you have experienced the sort of malicious vindictive persecution that I have, from the Common Purpose criminals, it makes you wise. This headmaster, who is much beloved by all the children, staff and parents of that school, is shortly retiring and I want him to have a bit of peace and quiet, not harrassment off Common Purpose criminals, he told me that the man who I have formally accused of raping me had turned up unnanounced at the school, and wanted to know if the Court Order, prohibiting no direct contact between my son and himself was still in place, and I told him that it was. The headmaster told me that he thought as much - he has a copy of the Court Order, and told me that he would show this man to the school gates.
Now, the rapist, I have found out from another source, is going round my mother's house and also my brothers and sisters houses, and causing trouble. I can no longer see any of my brothers and sisters, as they are all playing this sad little game of "Happy Families", and sadly, my relationship with my mother, which has always been fragile, seems to be destroyed beyond redemption. My relationship with my mother has caused me a lot of heartache, as no -one wants to be at odds with their own mother, but it has always been fragile due to the guilt she felt about me being raped by my brother and then put into a Pindown home run by paedophiles (Chadswell Assessment Centre), and, as is typical in this sort of situation, it seems easier to make the victim of abuse the scapegoat, than to accept what happened and deal with it. My mother and siblings wanted me to cut out a huge chunk of my life, and pretend that it did not happen, which I have always point blank refused to do. Ugly as it is, my childhood is my past history, and I can not and will not invent a lie to cover up my past. Neither will I bear the shame of what was done to me as a child - I did that for many years and it nearly destroyed me. I have written letters to my mother, begging her to understand how I feel, about the way she is playing Happy Families with the man who I have accused of raping me. I can't go round to see her, as everything I talk to her about gets back to him. He even tried to use a story I told her in innocence, of how I had taken some rotten onions back to a shop and got my money back, against me. He retold the story to the judge - he had only heard the story third hand, off my mum, but he told the judge a twisted version of the onion return incident, coloured and distorted to make me out to be some sort of a raging aggressive lunatic who ought to be sectioned!
So the rapist continues his obsessive stalking. I am posting this here, as a record of what is going on. I have not informed Staffordshire Police, as I am quite sure that if they can't be arsed to deal with complaints about child abuse and rape, they are not really going to do anything about stalking. Obviously, if anything should happen to me, this blog posting will bear witness to the dreadful way I have already been treated.
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
Thursday, 17 June 2010
A MYSTERY
Why would a former Iranian military leader and statesman called Sardar Mehdi want his company that he is General Manager of which is called MiG Productions, to put on a play about hypnosis by a world renouned Black Country playright and writer of books about hypnotism called David Tristram at The Gatehouse Theatre, Stafford?
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
VOTE FOR STUART SYVRET ON WEDNESDAY 16TH JUNE
CHOICES:
Who Wants to –
Or Who Can –
Continue to Live
With “The Jersey Way”?
I remarked a long time ago that I was going to enjoy this by-election.
Well – perhaps "enjoy" isn't quite the right word – as I'm resigned – in deep sadness – to the fact that our community is in the iron grip of a nakedly corrupt establishment – who are virtually impossible to combat – and whose malign stupidity and unashamed wickedness has done so much damage to Jersey's future.
When I wrote that I would enjoy this election, what I meant was that I personally was unconcerned at the result. And, indeed, such freedom has enabled me to achieve one of the main objectives I had in triggering this by-election; namely – introducing some of the plain truth to the voting public during these weeks of campaigning.
For example – at the Grouville husting a question was asked to the effect: 'whether the recently departed Housing Minister, Terry Le Main, was correct to have resigned?'
Of course the candidates all said 'yes' – but several of them expressed sympathy for Le Main, suggesting that "he hadn't been allowed a proper defence".
Being free to tell the truth – I was able to answer – to applause and the laughter of recognition - that three-quarters of the population of Jersey had known perfectly well for decades that Le Main is a brazen crook and text-book example of a spiv – who should have been prosecuted years ago – never mind remaining as a States member.
I was also able to briefly compare and contrast the "right to a defence" that some believed Le Main had been denied – with the absolute denial of any such right to me during several examples of straightforward, unlawful political oppression I have been subjected to by our oligarchy over the years.
And – by happy co-incidence – who should be sat at the back of the audience but former Bailiff Sir Philip Bailhache.
I was able to point at Phil and state –"there is Philip Bailhache – that man unlawfully prevented the official publication of my Ministerial Notes, which were to be tabled as my defence against the engineering of my dismissal as Health & Social Services Minister."
A statement of fact that even he could make no attempt to dispute.
We only have sixty seconds to answer each question – but had time permitted, I would also have recounted in detail Bailhache's absolute and unlawful denial of any opportunity for me to defend myself when he had me unlawfully suspended from the States for six months – back in 1996 – because I had discovered and exposed a friend of his, then Senator Reg Jeune, engaging in straightforward corruption.
Though the decent population of Jersey know perfectly well that corruption is the very flesh and bones – and the very fuel - of power in the island, the climate of fear which the oligarchy have so carefully maintained over the decades prevents most people expressing that knowledge publicly.
The corruption is never combated because we do not make it an issue of public political concern – because we're too afraid to openly state its existence. People look at what the Jersey oligarchy are able to do to people of no-less seniority than the Chief Constable of the Police Force, Graham Power, and the senior Senator, me – and they think, 'my God – if the crooks can get away with such obviously unlawful oppression of people in positions of power – what will they do to me and my family if I upset them?'
But our problem is doubly bad. Not only are we a community in which the public cannot lead the campaign for a clean-up, because decent people live in fear – we also cannot look to our police, prosecution system, judiciary, media or politicians to root-out the corruption for us – because all of those entities themselves are contaminated with the sleaze.
Of course, there are many decent and honest people in the police – and even a few decent and honest politicians. But when the people who call the shots – who wield the power – want the bent status quo to remain in place – a decent silent majority can be powerless.
Which is why – especially in light of the gravely serious revelations of the last three years – I have had to shoulder the burden of becoming Jersey's first ever political anti-corruption campaigner; a nightmarishly difficult task, that I'm not prepared to undertake – unless I have the clear support of the people of Jersey.
Hence this by-election – and the opportunity it affords me to engage in some plain speaking.
So - at the hustings at St. Saviours and at St. Peters - I used my opening five minute speech to inform the audience of the conduct of Terry Le Main – his friend, Geoff Noel – and associates - and a bent land-rezoning exercise.
A nakedly corrupt enterprise so large-scale and brazen - and consequently damaging to the oligarchy, should the truth emerge – that they have done everything in their power to conceal it.
Those actions have – so far - included a bent cop unlawfully leaking to the then Attorney General, William Bailhache, correspondence from the person making the criminal complaint. Bill Bailhache in turn, unlawfully leaking that correspondence to his brother – then Bailiff Sir Philip Bailhache – who then further broke the law by seeking to intimidate and harass a States member contra Article 47 of the States of Jersey Law.
No matter how bad you imagined the corruption – it is, actually, worse.
For example – and though I've published this before, it bears repeated contemplation – just consider this quote taken from a secret file-note written by the Chief of Police, Graham Power, in July 2007, in respect of senior civil servants trying to stop me from exposing child protection failures: -
"Bill Ogley and the others were persistent and I was left with the clear impression that they were attempting to draw me, in my capacity as Chief of Police, into a civil service led attempt to remove a Minister from Office."
What greater corruption can there be than the concealment of child protection failures; the concealment of child abuse?
Yet the corrupt and criminal concealment of child abuse – is what Bill Ogley and the other civil servants were engaging in – to the disgust of Graham Power – back in July 2007.
But – Graham Power was unlawfully suspended – and the evidenced crook, Bill Ogley, continues to be in your employment as the fourth most expensive civil servant in Britain.
Very strange, no?
As I sit and write this – in June 2010 – there is more than enough published evidence to show any thinking person that the Jersey establishment corruptly sabotaged the child abuse investigation – and that unlawfully oppressing Graham Power was a necessary part of that conspiracy.
But there were also other motives; other pressing reasons why the Jersey oligarchy just had to remove Graham Power from his post. After all – when you have been as corrupt and malfeasant as the Jersey establishment has, for so long, been – what could be more frightening than a straight, tough, nationally respected Chief Constable?
And it is one of those other reasons that I am going to recount in this posting.
I want to begin by reminding readers of something I wrote in my blog posting of the 21st April: -
"However – in the catalogue of errors that has been the Jersey oligarchy's conduct throughout the child abuse scandal – there are three disastrous misjudgements – three terminally suicidal actions – that there was never, really, going to be any recovery from.
Firstly, the decision by the Jersey cabinet – to join with the corrupt civil servants in the deliberate concealing of child abuse – and their engineering of my dismissal as a Minister.
Secondly, the - frankly insane – action of corruptly and improperly suspending the Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police Force. A nationally respected Chief Constable and holder of the Queens Police Medal. And doing so – in support of, of all things – the sabotaging of a major child abuse investigation.
Thirdly, the crazed, Mugabesque, police-state arrest, searching and oppression of a prominent opposition politician. The theft of his constituents' private data, the denial of his human rights, the refusal to provide legal representation and attempts to prevent him from even adducing the evidence he needs to defend himself."
Those three criminal and anti-democratic acts of the Jersey oligarchy have several characteristics in common.
However, there is one, shared, characteristic that is more noteworthy than the others.
Behind each of those bizarre and, frankly stupid, acts – there is one, prominent individual – who has been the same controlling and driving force at the centre of each of the three malfeasances.
That individual is William Bailhache.
Former Attorney General – and now Deputy Bailiff.
An evidenced liar and crook.
Back in 2007 he provided a great deal of 'legal' 'advice' and 'guidance' to the then cabinet, in their efforts to engineer my dismissal. He also failed to warn them of the criminality of their actions, and those of the civil servants involved – indeed, he joined in with those criminal actions. He also directed and used then – as his successor as Attorney General continues to do to this day – the Data Protection Commissioner to unlawfully harass and oppress me.
However – it isn't those events of 2007 that I want to focus upon. Instead, I want to examine some – seemingly - unconnected events that occurred in 2008 and 2009; the events I have briefly explained at a couple of the hustings meetings.
During 2007 and early 2008, the Deputy of Grouville, Carolyn Labey, was growing increasingly concerned at plans to re-zone a significant number of areas of open land across the island. Designated in the legally binding planning policy as ‘country-side’ or ‘green-zone’ land, the many fields in question were – supposedly – protected from development.
Jersey is a very small island; around 45 square miles. Land is at a premium. With a population of around 100,000, demand for property is very high. For example, a standard, three-bedroom family starter home, of the kind a newly married couple might buy, cost an average sum of over £500,000.
There is also a tremendous amount of money in Jersey – albeit poorly distributed. Those many people on lower and middle incomes often struggling to make ends meet in an environment that has a cost of living at least equivalent to central London. And the cost of accommodation is the major part of that financial burden.
So – land in short supply; huge demand for homes; the off-shore finance industry injecting lots of money into the local economy – and lots of developers and property speculators – often including local oligarchs – looking to make fortunes in a feeding-frenzy of development.
A market in which a piece of green-zone land might have its already high value - multiplied thirty times – in the course of a single afternoon – if the States can be persuaded to re-zone in favour of development.
There we have a picture of Jersey’s second-largest economic sector: the accommodation industry.
Now – here’s a funny thing. Did you know that during the last four decades of immense economic expansion in Jersey – we have never had as much as one, single case of planning corruption?
Which is quite amazing – when you think about it – because of all the types of corruption to be found at local and regional government level, throughout the developed world, planning corruption is – by far – the most common. One reads of prosecutions and convictions whenever one studies the subject.
Jersey is a small island with a limited supply of land - some of the highest property values to be found anywhere on the face of the planet - with billions and billions of dollars floating around in the island, vast fortunes to be made, and no central government to monitor the conduct of the local authorities. But - in-spite of that seemingly toxic amalgam of ingredients - which could have been assembled for the sole purpose of breeding corruption on a massive scale - Jersey has never - ever - had as much as one single example of planning corruption.
Isn't that just brilliant?
Now – there are two possible explanations for that state of affairs.
1: Jersey property speculators – and the island’s authorities - have all been people of superhuman moral perfection – thus causing Jersey to be unique in the entire global history of modern, developed societies – in having no planning corruption.
Or –
2: Planning corruption has been rampant and endemic in Jersey for decades – but the island’s oligarchy have rather liked things that way – hence no charges or prosecutions; it being just another example of “The Jersey Way” at work – a bit like the child abuse. A lot of people know it’s going on – but they’re involved in it – or they consider it too “impolite” to mention it – or they’re too terrified of retributions from the powers-that-be to do anything about it.
I invite readers to weigh-up the probabilities for themselves.
Meanwhile – back to our narrative.
From September 2006 discussions took place amongst a group of people, including the Planning Minister, the twelve parish Connetables, certain property developers and the then Housing Minister – Terry – Tel Boy – Le Main.
These discussions had the supposed objective of identifying land suitable for development to provide “essential” housing for the over-55s, and eventually led to the production of a ‘white-paper’ which was then presented at a number of public meetings.
At face value, this exercise might seem perfectly reasonable; after all, perhaps there genuinely was a pressing need to create such housing.
However – upon closer examination, the exercise had a number of deeply puzzling characteristics.
For example –
• The eight large sites identified for such housing – just happened to be in the countryside-zone or green-zone.
• The twelve Connetables – in “surveying” the populations of their parishes to gauge the supposed “need” for such housing – used different criteria - or even no criteria - from parish to parish, leading to random and amorphous results – the veracity and consistency of which could never quite be pinned-down.
• No methodologically sound, verifiable analysis of the supposed “need” for this housing has ever been produced.
• This open land was being proposed for development – over and above far more suitable ‘brown-field’ sites – such as some redundant glasshouses; the island’s tomato growing industry having declined.
• Strangely, the re-zoning of these eight pieces of land was being rushed through – even though a fundamental review of the island’s planning policies and zoning had begun. Far more rational, surely, to wait twelve months, and examine the need for such housing – and any resultant need for land re-zoning - within the broad policy of planning in Jersey, the ‘Island Plan’?
• Notwithstanding the absence of any methodologically robust justification for, or analyses of, the supposed “need” for this specific type of housing – nor any meaningful contextualizing of it within a broad housing strategy – the then Housing Minister – Tel Boy Le Main – was rabid in his insistence that the “need” was ‘urgent and pressing’ – and in using his political influence to ensure that these eight sites be re-zoned to enable development. Indeed, when bringing forward the proposals for debate, the Planning Minister made it clear he was doing so only because of the insistence by the Housing Minister that the re-zoning for this type of housing was essential.
• Of the eight sites brought forward for re-zoning, a certain property developer – a Mr. Geoff Noel – had a heavy commercial interest in at least five of them.
• Mr. Noel happens to be a personal friend of the then Housing Minister, Terry – Tel Boy – Le Main.
• The same Housing Minster who had to recently resign – for having sought to use his influence to have a prosecution of another friend of his, dropped.
In early 2008, being deeply concerned at the seeming irrationality of this exercise, and alarmed at what may well be the needless destruction of environmentally important open land, Deputy Carolyn Labey brought a proposition for debate before the States (P.33/2008) in which she argued strongly that the proposed re-zoning made no sense ahead of the Island Plan review; that there was no consistency or method in the assessment of the supposed “need” for such housing; and that, in any event, if such need did exist, the States should first look to such brown-field sights as certain redundant glasshouses.
The major part of her proposition was that the re-zoning of the eight sites should not be proceeded with, and, instead should be considered as a part of the overall Island Plan review.
The debate took place in April 2008, and that central part of the motion was heavily defeated – there being a Jersey Establishment Party ‘three-line-whip’ to vote against it.
Subsequently, the re-zoning proposition – P.75/2008 – was tabled, debated – and approved – in July 2008.
However, the two debates – as is often the way of these things – were of particular interest to quite a number of members of the public, who contacted the Deputy – and provided her with information that made the whole re-zoning exercise appear even more dubious.
Deputy Labey then spent some months investigating the matter further, and gathered more information.
What she learnt so alarmed her – she reported the matter to the police.
And not just any police officer – but the Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, Graham Power, Queens Police Medal.
Mr. Power considered the Deputy’s information and agreed that it could be a very serious matter, and that it did, indeed, merit full and thorough investigation.
He handed the case to a senior officer to carry forward – one Dave Minty.
Minty approached the investigation with what appeared to be complete intransigence.
Notwithstanding repeated requests from Deputy Labey to know what progress was being made, nothing appeared to happen. Indeed, Minty flatly refused to formally interview certain willing witnesses, who were prepared to make statements.
Nevertheless, unable to simply ignore the complaints totally, they were instead referred to the Controller and Auditor General.
Earlier in this process – with rumors of investigation beginning to circulate – Le Main is known to have had a meeting with the then Bailiff, Sir Philip Bailhache. It was shortly after this meeting that the investigative process seemed to come to a virtual halt.
Deputy Labey again e-mailed the Chief of Police, Mr. Power, to express concern that the powers-that-be might be slowing the investigation in order to protect Le Main, and/or avoid a major scandal for the States. Mr. Power – quite properly – added the e-mail correspondence to the case-file. The case being supposedly investigated by Dave Minty.
By now, the date was early November, 2008.
It was around this time that Mr. Power - before leaving the island for a short break – was in communication one evening with the then Attorney General, William Bailhache.
Mr. Bailhache raised the issue of the Deputy’s complaint with Mr. Power – and strongly expressed to him the view that it should not be taken seriously. He said “the Deputy’s judgment couldn’t be trusted; one only had to look at who her partner was.” The pressure and stress of the various oppressions we have both suffered having since driven us apart, but at that time I was her partner.
Mr. Power grew angry at this, and informed the Attorney General that his remarks were wholly inappropriate; that the Deputy’s complaint to the police was the proper thing to have done, and that the matter did need inquiring into.
However – unbeknown to Mr. Power and Deputy Labey, Dave Minty had simply been leaking everything – including the Deputy’s e-mails to Mr. Power – directly to William Bailhache. This in direct and flagrant violation of the Data Protection Law.
And – in turn – William Bailhache was leaking at least some of this data – to his brother – the then Bailiff, Sir. Philip Bailhache. Again – this leaking of data – and its receipt – both being unambiguous criminal acts. For not only was the Data Protection Law being broken – it also amounted to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
That this unlawful leaking of data was taking place was discovered by Deputy Labey – or rather it was revealed to her – in subsequent events.
On the 5th November, 2008, the Deputy received an angry message from the Bailiff’s chambers – demanding that she attend his office that day, as there was an issue he wanted to speak with her about.
Although intimidated by this, the Deputy refused to attend that day, as she had other commitments, but did agree to go to his office the next day – the 6th November.
As soon as the door was closed and she was alone with Philip Bailhache – “he threw across the desk” at her, “a copy of one of her e-mails to Graham Power, and demanded that she explain her actions in making the complaint, and demanded that she write a letter of ‘apology’ to Graham Power ‘for having “misled” him with her e-mails’”.
The actions of Philip Bailhache were unlawful in many respects. Not only was he in breach of the Data Protection Law – he was also breaking Article 47 of the States of Jersey Law – by attempting to intimidate and harass a States member.
Shocked, intimidated and very upset at these events, Deputy Labey – with reluctance – wrote an e-mail to Mr. Power, but not one of ‘apology’; instead it, essentially, just informed him that the meeting had occurred, and what had been said to her.
Mr. Power, by this stage, was on leave in the United Kingdom for a few days. No doubt – once preliminary investigations, and the work of the Controller and Auditor General had been completed, the Police Chief would have then ensured a full investigation did take place.
However – he was unable to see that this happened.
At 8.44 a.m on the morning of Saturday the 8th November – William Bailhache wrote the first draft of the letter of suspension that was to be served on Graham Power – without warning – by Bill Ogley and Andrew Lewis - on the morning of the 12th November 2008.
That being the supposed “emergency” suspension - the letters for which, having - supposedly - been written only in the preceding twelve hours before the meeting on the morning of the 12th.
The “official” version of events went like this: the recently appointed Deputy Police Chief, David Warcup, received an “interim report” by Brian Sweeting, of the Metropolitan Police. This being a peer-review of the historic child abuse investigation.
The report by Sweeting allegedly contained such criticism of the child abuse investigation, that it merited the immediate suspension of Graham Power.
This notwithstanding the fact that four reports by the Association of Chief Police Officers - ACPO – had thoroughly endorsed the historic abuse investigation - and Sweeting did not even interview the two, central figures relevant to the conduct of the investigation – Lenny Harper, and Andre Baker of ACPO – until the 18th November.
That being eight days after Warcup received Sweeting’s “Met report” on the 10th November 2008.
And ten days after William Bailhache wrote the first draft of the suspension letter – on the morning of the 8th November 2008.
Mr. Power strongly suspected that the “official” version of events was not true, and he strove to obtain the evidence.
Eventually – after nine months of official lies – and absolute determined refusal by Terry Le Sueur to disclose this information - Mr. Power eventually succeeded in obtaining the electronic data that showed the true date and time of when the key letters were first created.
Not on the 11th November – as the “official” version of events had it – but on the morning of the 8th November.
Two full days before the “interim Met report” was received by David Warcup.
Plainly – the Jersey oligarchy had many pressing motivations to remove, and attempt to discredit, the Chief of Police – not least their urgent wish to ridicule, in the eyes of the public, the historic abuse investigation – before the politically crucial Deputy elections later that November.
Mr. Power is firmly of the view that amongst those establishment motivations for ‘neutralizing’ him – was his attitude to the planning corruption issues raised by Deputy Labey – and his defense of her in response to William Bailhache’s denigrations.
But – no doubt to the distress of the establishment – the question of planning corruption was not terminated with the unlawful suspension of Mr. Power.
Deputy Labey, in response to constituents’ concerns, continued to research the subject, and press for a full investigation.
In March 2009, I made an unrelated public interest disclosure, by posting on this blog a police report concerning a matter of the utmost seriousness. However – not withstanding the fact that the report in question had already become a public document following its tabling as evidence in the Royal Courts of Justice in London, the Jersey oligarchy decided to use its internet publication by me, as an excuse to mount an unlawful massed police raid against me. At that time I shared the home of Deputy Labey.
I stepped from the door of the house shortly after 9.00 a.m, and was immediately descended upon by three unmarked police cars, each carrying two non-uniformed officers, who leapt from the vehicles and surrounded me – informing me that I was under arrest for a supposed breach of the Data Protection Law. Another two officers were present to take part in the search, and another two had been waiting in a van in the road outside, equipped with a battering-ram – of the kind used in drugs raids – “had it become necessary to effect a forced entry”.
I spent seven and a half hours locked in police cells – whilst the police turned over the Deputy’s house from top to bottom – including the children’s’ bedrooms.
The police had no search warrant.
The Data Protection Law clearly stipulates a due process for investigating any alleged breach – part of which includes the requirement to obtain a search warrant should any raid become necessary.
The police chose to ignore that law – instead relying – unlawfully – on an emergency search power. This was a tactic quite deliberately settled upon by the Attorney General, William Bailhache and David Warcup – because had the raid been conducted under a search warrant for the purposes of the Data Protection Law, the search could only have been undertaken to the extent reasonable and proportionate for the purpose for which the warrant was issued.
And that just wouldn’t do.
The raid and search had many motivations. Not least amongst them, enabling the theft of my constituents’ private data and communications with me – and attempting to identify and intimidate my various sources.
But – also this.
The Attorney General, William Bailhache was increasingly alarmed at the continuing interest of Deputy Labey in the question of possible planning corruption. Clearly – he and the rest of the oligarchs were determined to bury it and protect the establishment from a scandal. But – was a continuing cover-up feasible? What if the Deputy simply had too much information?
Only one way to find out.
The Deputy and I worked from the same office on the premises.
Amongst the files searched and copied by the police during the raid was one of her large file transfer cases, in which she kept some of the information related to the planning corruption.
The box in question was left with its lid open, in a disturbed state on a table in the office.
On the day of the raid and during the next day, the police officer responsible for the operation was quoted in the local media.
He was Dave Minty.
The same man who was prevaricating over investigating the Deputy’s complaints.
The same man who unlawfully leaked the Deputy’s e-mails to Graham Power – to William Bailhache – all those months earlier.
But – Minty suddenly vanished from all – apparent – involvement in the unlawful raid – a couple of days after it took place.
And – even more strikingly – even though it is a matter of public record from the media reports of the time, that he was involved in controlling the operation – his involvement has been repeatedly – dishonestly – denied.
The Advocate prosecuting me for supposed breaches of the Data Protection Law – Stephen Baker, formerly of 7 Bedford Row - and a former employee of William Bailhache - has repeatedly committed perjury during preliminary court hearings, by denying Minty’s involvement.
Why – we must wonder – should the establishment be quite so desperate to pretend that Minty was not involved in the planning or controlling of the unlawful police raid?
And why should the politically motivated prosecution being mounted against me – initiated by William Bailhache – have repeatedly refused to disclose to me the evidence necessary to my defense?
Well – look at this way; such a unique and impressive record – as having had no planning corruption in Jersey during all the post-war years – doesn’t get maintained by accident.
That, then, is one case-study of just how corrupt and defective governance in Jersey is.
This by-election is happening for one reason – and one reason only.
Because I and others have fought against such corruption; fought against it above and beyond the call of duty. But in the final analyses – we few can’t defeat it.
Only the people of Jersey can do that.
But, do they want to?
The out-come of the by-election this Wednesday answers that question.
And no matter what the answer – if I win, or if I lose – Thursday morning is a bright, new start.
Stuart.
Who Wants to –
Or Who Can –
Continue to Live
With “The Jersey Way”?
I remarked a long time ago that I was going to enjoy this by-election.
Well – perhaps "enjoy" isn't quite the right word – as I'm resigned – in deep sadness – to the fact that our community is in the iron grip of a nakedly corrupt establishment – who are virtually impossible to combat – and whose malign stupidity and unashamed wickedness has done so much damage to Jersey's future.
When I wrote that I would enjoy this election, what I meant was that I personally was unconcerned at the result. And, indeed, such freedom has enabled me to achieve one of the main objectives I had in triggering this by-election; namely – introducing some of the plain truth to the voting public during these weeks of campaigning.
For example – at the Grouville husting a question was asked to the effect: 'whether the recently departed Housing Minister, Terry Le Main, was correct to have resigned?'
Of course the candidates all said 'yes' – but several of them expressed sympathy for Le Main, suggesting that "he hadn't been allowed a proper defence".
Being free to tell the truth – I was able to answer – to applause and the laughter of recognition - that three-quarters of the population of Jersey had known perfectly well for decades that Le Main is a brazen crook and text-book example of a spiv – who should have been prosecuted years ago – never mind remaining as a States member.
I was also able to briefly compare and contrast the "right to a defence" that some believed Le Main had been denied – with the absolute denial of any such right to me during several examples of straightforward, unlawful political oppression I have been subjected to by our oligarchy over the years.
And – by happy co-incidence – who should be sat at the back of the audience but former Bailiff Sir Philip Bailhache.
I was able to point at Phil and state –"there is Philip Bailhache – that man unlawfully prevented the official publication of my Ministerial Notes, which were to be tabled as my defence against the engineering of my dismissal as Health & Social Services Minister."
A statement of fact that even he could make no attempt to dispute.
We only have sixty seconds to answer each question – but had time permitted, I would also have recounted in detail Bailhache's absolute and unlawful denial of any opportunity for me to defend myself when he had me unlawfully suspended from the States for six months – back in 1996 – because I had discovered and exposed a friend of his, then Senator Reg Jeune, engaging in straightforward corruption.
Though the decent population of Jersey know perfectly well that corruption is the very flesh and bones – and the very fuel - of power in the island, the climate of fear which the oligarchy have so carefully maintained over the decades prevents most people expressing that knowledge publicly.
The corruption is never combated because we do not make it an issue of public political concern – because we're too afraid to openly state its existence. People look at what the Jersey oligarchy are able to do to people of no-less seniority than the Chief Constable of the Police Force, Graham Power, and the senior Senator, me – and they think, 'my God – if the crooks can get away with such obviously unlawful oppression of people in positions of power – what will they do to me and my family if I upset them?'
But our problem is doubly bad. Not only are we a community in which the public cannot lead the campaign for a clean-up, because decent people live in fear – we also cannot look to our police, prosecution system, judiciary, media or politicians to root-out the corruption for us – because all of those entities themselves are contaminated with the sleaze.
Of course, there are many decent and honest people in the police – and even a few decent and honest politicians. But when the people who call the shots – who wield the power – want the bent status quo to remain in place – a decent silent majority can be powerless.
Which is why – especially in light of the gravely serious revelations of the last three years – I have had to shoulder the burden of becoming Jersey's first ever political anti-corruption campaigner; a nightmarishly difficult task, that I'm not prepared to undertake – unless I have the clear support of the people of Jersey.
Hence this by-election – and the opportunity it affords me to engage in some plain speaking.
So - at the hustings at St. Saviours and at St. Peters - I used my opening five minute speech to inform the audience of the conduct of Terry Le Main – his friend, Geoff Noel – and associates - and a bent land-rezoning exercise.
A nakedly corrupt enterprise so large-scale and brazen - and consequently damaging to the oligarchy, should the truth emerge – that they have done everything in their power to conceal it.
Those actions have – so far - included a bent cop unlawfully leaking to the then Attorney General, William Bailhache, correspondence from the person making the criminal complaint. Bill Bailhache in turn, unlawfully leaking that correspondence to his brother – then Bailiff Sir Philip Bailhache – who then further broke the law by seeking to intimidate and harass a States member contra Article 47 of the States of Jersey Law.
No matter how bad you imagined the corruption – it is, actually, worse.
For example – and though I've published this before, it bears repeated contemplation – just consider this quote taken from a secret file-note written by the Chief of Police, Graham Power, in July 2007, in respect of senior civil servants trying to stop me from exposing child protection failures: -
"Bill Ogley and the others were persistent and I was left with the clear impression that they were attempting to draw me, in my capacity as Chief of Police, into a civil service led attempt to remove a Minister from Office."
What greater corruption can there be than the concealment of child protection failures; the concealment of child abuse?
Yet the corrupt and criminal concealment of child abuse – is what Bill Ogley and the other civil servants were engaging in – to the disgust of Graham Power – back in July 2007.
But – Graham Power was unlawfully suspended – and the evidenced crook, Bill Ogley, continues to be in your employment as the fourth most expensive civil servant in Britain.
Very strange, no?
As I sit and write this – in June 2010 – there is more than enough published evidence to show any thinking person that the Jersey establishment corruptly sabotaged the child abuse investigation – and that unlawfully oppressing Graham Power was a necessary part of that conspiracy.
But there were also other motives; other pressing reasons why the Jersey oligarchy just had to remove Graham Power from his post. After all – when you have been as corrupt and malfeasant as the Jersey establishment has, for so long, been – what could be more frightening than a straight, tough, nationally respected Chief Constable?
And it is one of those other reasons that I am going to recount in this posting.
I want to begin by reminding readers of something I wrote in my blog posting of the 21st April: -
"However – in the catalogue of errors that has been the Jersey oligarchy's conduct throughout the child abuse scandal – there are three disastrous misjudgements – three terminally suicidal actions – that there was never, really, going to be any recovery from.
Firstly, the decision by the Jersey cabinet – to join with the corrupt civil servants in the deliberate concealing of child abuse – and their engineering of my dismissal as a Minister.
Secondly, the - frankly insane – action of corruptly and improperly suspending the Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police Force. A nationally respected Chief Constable and holder of the Queens Police Medal. And doing so – in support of, of all things – the sabotaging of a major child abuse investigation.
Thirdly, the crazed, Mugabesque, police-state arrest, searching and oppression of a prominent opposition politician. The theft of his constituents' private data, the denial of his human rights, the refusal to provide legal representation and attempts to prevent him from even adducing the evidence he needs to defend himself."
Those three criminal and anti-democratic acts of the Jersey oligarchy have several characteristics in common.
However, there is one, shared, characteristic that is more noteworthy than the others.
Behind each of those bizarre and, frankly stupid, acts – there is one, prominent individual – who has been the same controlling and driving force at the centre of each of the three malfeasances.
That individual is William Bailhache.
Former Attorney General – and now Deputy Bailiff.
An evidenced liar and crook.
Back in 2007 he provided a great deal of 'legal' 'advice' and 'guidance' to the then cabinet, in their efforts to engineer my dismissal. He also failed to warn them of the criminality of their actions, and those of the civil servants involved – indeed, he joined in with those criminal actions. He also directed and used then – as his successor as Attorney General continues to do to this day – the Data Protection Commissioner to unlawfully harass and oppress me.
However – it isn't those events of 2007 that I want to focus upon. Instead, I want to examine some – seemingly - unconnected events that occurred in 2008 and 2009; the events I have briefly explained at a couple of the hustings meetings.
During 2007 and early 2008, the Deputy of Grouville, Carolyn Labey, was growing increasingly concerned at plans to re-zone a significant number of areas of open land across the island. Designated in the legally binding planning policy as ‘country-side’ or ‘green-zone’ land, the many fields in question were – supposedly – protected from development.
Jersey is a very small island; around 45 square miles. Land is at a premium. With a population of around 100,000, demand for property is very high. For example, a standard, three-bedroom family starter home, of the kind a newly married couple might buy, cost an average sum of over £500,000.
There is also a tremendous amount of money in Jersey – albeit poorly distributed. Those many people on lower and middle incomes often struggling to make ends meet in an environment that has a cost of living at least equivalent to central London. And the cost of accommodation is the major part of that financial burden.
So – land in short supply; huge demand for homes; the off-shore finance industry injecting lots of money into the local economy – and lots of developers and property speculators – often including local oligarchs – looking to make fortunes in a feeding-frenzy of development.
A market in which a piece of green-zone land might have its already high value - multiplied thirty times – in the course of a single afternoon – if the States can be persuaded to re-zone in favour of development.
There we have a picture of Jersey’s second-largest economic sector: the accommodation industry.
Now – here’s a funny thing. Did you know that during the last four decades of immense economic expansion in Jersey – we have never had as much as one, single case of planning corruption?
Which is quite amazing – when you think about it – because of all the types of corruption to be found at local and regional government level, throughout the developed world, planning corruption is – by far – the most common. One reads of prosecutions and convictions whenever one studies the subject.
Jersey is a small island with a limited supply of land - some of the highest property values to be found anywhere on the face of the planet - with billions and billions of dollars floating around in the island, vast fortunes to be made, and no central government to monitor the conduct of the local authorities. But - in-spite of that seemingly toxic amalgam of ingredients - which could have been assembled for the sole purpose of breeding corruption on a massive scale - Jersey has never - ever - had as much as one single example of planning corruption.
Isn't that just brilliant?
Now – there are two possible explanations for that state of affairs.
1: Jersey property speculators – and the island’s authorities - have all been people of superhuman moral perfection – thus causing Jersey to be unique in the entire global history of modern, developed societies – in having no planning corruption.
Or –
2: Planning corruption has been rampant and endemic in Jersey for decades – but the island’s oligarchy have rather liked things that way – hence no charges or prosecutions; it being just another example of “The Jersey Way” at work – a bit like the child abuse. A lot of people know it’s going on – but they’re involved in it – or they consider it too “impolite” to mention it – or they’re too terrified of retributions from the powers-that-be to do anything about it.
I invite readers to weigh-up the probabilities for themselves.
Meanwhile – back to our narrative.
From September 2006 discussions took place amongst a group of people, including the Planning Minister, the twelve parish Connetables, certain property developers and the then Housing Minister – Terry – Tel Boy – Le Main.
These discussions had the supposed objective of identifying land suitable for development to provide “essential” housing for the over-55s, and eventually led to the production of a ‘white-paper’ which was then presented at a number of public meetings.
At face value, this exercise might seem perfectly reasonable; after all, perhaps there genuinely was a pressing need to create such housing.
However – upon closer examination, the exercise had a number of deeply puzzling characteristics.
For example –
• The eight large sites identified for such housing – just happened to be in the countryside-zone or green-zone.
• The twelve Connetables – in “surveying” the populations of their parishes to gauge the supposed “need” for such housing – used different criteria - or even no criteria - from parish to parish, leading to random and amorphous results – the veracity and consistency of which could never quite be pinned-down.
• No methodologically sound, verifiable analysis of the supposed “need” for this housing has ever been produced.
• This open land was being proposed for development – over and above far more suitable ‘brown-field’ sites – such as some redundant glasshouses; the island’s tomato growing industry having declined.
• Strangely, the re-zoning of these eight pieces of land was being rushed through – even though a fundamental review of the island’s planning policies and zoning had begun. Far more rational, surely, to wait twelve months, and examine the need for such housing – and any resultant need for land re-zoning - within the broad policy of planning in Jersey, the ‘Island Plan’?
• Notwithstanding the absence of any methodologically robust justification for, or analyses of, the supposed “need” for this specific type of housing – nor any meaningful contextualizing of it within a broad housing strategy – the then Housing Minister – Tel Boy Le Main – was rabid in his insistence that the “need” was ‘urgent and pressing’ – and in using his political influence to ensure that these eight sites be re-zoned to enable development. Indeed, when bringing forward the proposals for debate, the Planning Minister made it clear he was doing so only because of the insistence by the Housing Minister that the re-zoning for this type of housing was essential.
• Of the eight sites brought forward for re-zoning, a certain property developer – a Mr. Geoff Noel – had a heavy commercial interest in at least five of them.
• Mr. Noel happens to be a personal friend of the then Housing Minister, Terry – Tel Boy – Le Main.
• The same Housing Minster who had to recently resign – for having sought to use his influence to have a prosecution of another friend of his, dropped.
In early 2008, being deeply concerned at the seeming irrationality of this exercise, and alarmed at what may well be the needless destruction of environmentally important open land, Deputy Carolyn Labey brought a proposition for debate before the States (P.33/2008) in which she argued strongly that the proposed re-zoning made no sense ahead of the Island Plan review; that there was no consistency or method in the assessment of the supposed “need” for such housing; and that, in any event, if such need did exist, the States should first look to such brown-field sights as certain redundant glasshouses.
The major part of her proposition was that the re-zoning of the eight sites should not be proceeded with, and, instead should be considered as a part of the overall Island Plan review.
The debate took place in April 2008, and that central part of the motion was heavily defeated – there being a Jersey Establishment Party ‘three-line-whip’ to vote against it.
Subsequently, the re-zoning proposition – P.75/2008 – was tabled, debated – and approved – in July 2008.
However, the two debates – as is often the way of these things – were of particular interest to quite a number of members of the public, who contacted the Deputy – and provided her with information that made the whole re-zoning exercise appear even more dubious.
Deputy Labey then spent some months investigating the matter further, and gathered more information.
What she learnt so alarmed her – she reported the matter to the police.
And not just any police officer – but the Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, Graham Power, Queens Police Medal.
Mr. Power considered the Deputy’s information and agreed that it could be a very serious matter, and that it did, indeed, merit full and thorough investigation.
He handed the case to a senior officer to carry forward – one Dave Minty.
Minty approached the investigation with what appeared to be complete intransigence.
Notwithstanding repeated requests from Deputy Labey to know what progress was being made, nothing appeared to happen. Indeed, Minty flatly refused to formally interview certain willing witnesses, who were prepared to make statements.
Nevertheless, unable to simply ignore the complaints totally, they were instead referred to the Controller and Auditor General.
Earlier in this process – with rumors of investigation beginning to circulate – Le Main is known to have had a meeting with the then Bailiff, Sir Philip Bailhache. It was shortly after this meeting that the investigative process seemed to come to a virtual halt.
Deputy Labey again e-mailed the Chief of Police, Mr. Power, to express concern that the powers-that-be might be slowing the investigation in order to protect Le Main, and/or avoid a major scandal for the States. Mr. Power – quite properly – added the e-mail correspondence to the case-file. The case being supposedly investigated by Dave Minty.
By now, the date was early November, 2008.
It was around this time that Mr. Power - before leaving the island for a short break – was in communication one evening with the then Attorney General, William Bailhache.
Mr. Bailhache raised the issue of the Deputy’s complaint with Mr. Power – and strongly expressed to him the view that it should not be taken seriously. He said “the Deputy’s judgment couldn’t be trusted; one only had to look at who her partner was.” The pressure and stress of the various oppressions we have both suffered having since driven us apart, but at that time I was her partner.
Mr. Power grew angry at this, and informed the Attorney General that his remarks were wholly inappropriate; that the Deputy’s complaint to the police was the proper thing to have done, and that the matter did need inquiring into.
However – unbeknown to Mr. Power and Deputy Labey, Dave Minty had simply been leaking everything – including the Deputy’s e-mails to Mr. Power – directly to William Bailhache. This in direct and flagrant violation of the Data Protection Law.
And – in turn – William Bailhache was leaking at least some of this data – to his brother – the then Bailiff, Sir. Philip Bailhache. Again – this leaking of data – and its receipt – both being unambiguous criminal acts. For not only was the Data Protection Law being broken – it also amounted to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
That this unlawful leaking of data was taking place was discovered by Deputy Labey – or rather it was revealed to her – in subsequent events.
On the 5th November, 2008, the Deputy received an angry message from the Bailiff’s chambers – demanding that she attend his office that day, as there was an issue he wanted to speak with her about.
Although intimidated by this, the Deputy refused to attend that day, as she had other commitments, but did agree to go to his office the next day – the 6th November.
As soon as the door was closed and she was alone with Philip Bailhache – “he threw across the desk” at her, “a copy of one of her e-mails to Graham Power, and demanded that she explain her actions in making the complaint, and demanded that she write a letter of ‘apology’ to Graham Power ‘for having “misled” him with her e-mails’”.
The actions of Philip Bailhache were unlawful in many respects. Not only was he in breach of the Data Protection Law – he was also breaking Article 47 of the States of Jersey Law – by attempting to intimidate and harass a States member.
Shocked, intimidated and very upset at these events, Deputy Labey – with reluctance – wrote an e-mail to Mr. Power, but not one of ‘apology’; instead it, essentially, just informed him that the meeting had occurred, and what had been said to her.
Mr. Power, by this stage, was on leave in the United Kingdom for a few days. No doubt – once preliminary investigations, and the work of the Controller and Auditor General had been completed, the Police Chief would have then ensured a full investigation did take place.
However – he was unable to see that this happened.
At 8.44 a.m on the morning of Saturday the 8th November – William Bailhache wrote the first draft of the letter of suspension that was to be served on Graham Power – without warning – by Bill Ogley and Andrew Lewis - on the morning of the 12th November 2008.
That being the supposed “emergency” suspension - the letters for which, having - supposedly - been written only in the preceding twelve hours before the meeting on the morning of the 12th.
The “official” version of events went like this: the recently appointed Deputy Police Chief, David Warcup, received an “interim report” by Brian Sweeting, of the Metropolitan Police. This being a peer-review of the historic child abuse investigation.
The report by Sweeting allegedly contained such criticism of the child abuse investigation, that it merited the immediate suspension of Graham Power.
This notwithstanding the fact that four reports by the Association of Chief Police Officers - ACPO – had thoroughly endorsed the historic abuse investigation - and Sweeting did not even interview the two, central figures relevant to the conduct of the investigation – Lenny Harper, and Andre Baker of ACPO – until the 18th November.
That being eight days after Warcup received Sweeting’s “Met report” on the 10th November 2008.
And ten days after William Bailhache wrote the first draft of the suspension letter – on the morning of the 8th November 2008.
Mr. Power strongly suspected that the “official” version of events was not true, and he strove to obtain the evidence.
Eventually – after nine months of official lies – and absolute determined refusal by Terry Le Sueur to disclose this information - Mr. Power eventually succeeded in obtaining the electronic data that showed the true date and time of when the key letters were first created.
Not on the 11th November – as the “official” version of events had it – but on the morning of the 8th November.
Two full days before the “interim Met report” was received by David Warcup.
Plainly – the Jersey oligarchy had many pressing motivations to remove, and attempt to discredit, the Chief of Police – not least their urgent wish to ridicule, in the eyes of the public, the historic abuse investigation – before the politically crucial Deputy elections later that November.
Mr. Power is firmly of the view that amongst those establishment motivations for ‘neutralizing’ him – was his attitude to the planning corruption issues raised by Deputy Labey – and his defense of her in response to William Bailhache’s denigrations.
But – no doubt to the distress of the establishment – the question of planning corruption was not terminated with the unlawful suspension of Mr. Power.
Deputy Labey, in response to constituents’ concerns, continued to research the subject, and press for a full investigation.
In March 2009, I made an unrelated public interest disclosure, by posting on this blog a police report concerning a matter of the utmost seriousness. However – not withstanding the fact that the report in question had already become a public document following its tabling as evidence in the Royal Courts of Justice in London, the Jersey oligarchy decided to use its internet publication by me, as an excuse to mount an unlawful massed police raid against me. At that time I shared the home of Deputy Labey.
I stepped from the door of the house shortly after 9.00 a.m, and was immediately descended upon by three unmarked police cars, each carrying two non-uniformed officers, who leapt from the vehicles and surrounded me – informing me that I was under arrest for a supposed breach of the Data Protection Law. Another two officers were present to take part in the search, and another two had been waiting in a van in the road outside, equipped with a battering-ram – of the kind used in drugs raids – “had it become necessary to effect a forced entry”.
I spent seven and a half hours locked in police cells – whilst the police turned over the Deputy’s house from top to bottom – including the children’s’ bedrooms.
The police had no search warrant.
The Data Protection Law clearly stipulates a due process for investigating any alleged breach – part of which includes the requirement to obtain a search warrant should any raid become necessary.
The police chose to ignore that law – instead relying – unlawfully – on an emergency search power. This was a tactic quite deliberately settled upon by the Attorney General, William Bailhache and David Warcup – because had the raid been conducted under a search warrant for the purposes of the Data Protection Law, the search could only have been undertaken to the extent reasonable and proportionate for the purpose for which the warrant was issued.
And that just wouldn’t do.
The raid and search had many motivations. Not least amongst them, enabling the theft of my constituents’ private data and communications with me – and attempting to identify and intimidate my various sources.
But – also this.
The Attorney General, William Bailhache was increasingly alarmed at the continuing interest of Deputy Labey in the question of possible planning corruption. Clearly – he and the rest of the oligarchs were determined to bury it and protect the establishment from a scandal. But – was a continuing cover-up feasible? What if the Deputy simply had too much information?
Only one way to find out.
The Deputy and I worked from the same office on the premises.
Amongst the files searched and copied by the police during the raid was one of her large file transfer cases, in which she kept some of the information related to the planning corruption.
The box in question was left with its lid open, in a disturbed state on a table in the office.
On the day of the raid and during the next day, the police officer responsible for the operation was quoted in the local media.
He was Dave Minty.
The same man who was prevaricating over investigating the Deputy’s complaints.
The same man who unlawfully leaked the Deputy’s e-mails to Graham Power – to William Bailhache – all those months earlier.
But – Minty suddenly vanished from all – apparent – involvement in the unlawful raid – a couple of days after it took place.
And – even more strikingly – even though it is a matter of public record from the media reports of the time, that he was involved in controlling the operation – his involvement has been repeatedly – dishonestly – denied.
The Advocate prosecuting me for supposed breaches of the Data Protection Law – Stephen Baker, formerly of 7 Bedford Row - and a former employee of William Bailhache - has repeatedly committed perjury during preliminary court hearings, by denying Minty’s involvement.
Why – we must wonder – should the establishment be quite so desperate to pretend that Minty was not involved in the planning or controlling of the unlawful police raid?
And why should the politically motivated prosecution being mounted against me – initiated by William Bailhache – have repeatedly refused to disclose to me the evidence necessary to my defense?
Well – look at this way; such a unique and impressive record – as having had no planning corruption in Jersey during all the post-war years – doesn’t get maintained by accident.
That, then, is one case-study of just how corrupt and defective governance in Jersey is.
This by-election is happening for one reason – and one reason only.
Because I and others have fought against such corruption; fought against it above and beyond the call of duty. But in the final analyses – we few can’t defeat it.
Only the people of Jersey can do that.
But, do they want to?
The out-come of the by-election this Wednesday answers that question.
And no matter what the answer – if I win, or if I lose – Thursday morning is a bright, new start.
Stuart.
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION ON ANNA RACCOON SITE TITLED INTIMIDATION AND COERCION
As Anna Raccoon has decided to put a full stop to any more comments being made on her blog site to this topic, I thought I would supply a place where the discussion can continue.
These were the last 2 entries
" 149 concerned June 8, 2010 at 19:47
i am not posting to slag anyone else off i did an awful lot for the hollie campaign but did all without seeing evidence i have since seen paper work from drs in respect to examinations done and they do not signify abuse as has been previously claimed.i have seen no other evidence. i was abused by a family member and had to make a video statement to the police about it the member was arrested but cps said owing to the fact it was historical no further action,i would have presumed hollie would have made a video statement but this has never been mentioned tho it is practice to do so.i also question that if robert green and team are that sure of their evidence why they have not bought a private prosecution against the alleged abusers,i also think that anne has alot to answer for whether true or untrue the exposure hollie has had is unacceptable and places her at risk of actual abuse from paedophiles intimate details of vaginal examinations of her being posted on the net is unacceptable and as much as im no fan of social services or police they have a serious duty to investigate hollies exposure it is no conspiracy the police and social services being involved anne has bought this on all by herself for allowing her daughter to be exposed in such manner. as for all the bitching on the net from what i have seen all are as bad as each other and robert green cannot attack people for thinking differently calling them pro paedos etc robert green has stuffed things up big time for hollie and anne greig is more to blame than anyone else for allowing this to happen. i believe this will do alot of damage to robert green , brian gerrish etc and they are more concerned about that than hollie.poor hollie. anne greig cannot now moan about social services involvement she needs to start accepting what she has done to hollie is abusive in itself
150 concerned June 8, 2010 at 19:58
i would also like to add that i also advocate for people who have been falsly accused of abusing children as well as being a victim myself but i like to see actual evidence i have been stung in the past so i know from both sides had i been in robert greens situation i would have produced the evidence or instigated a private prosecution until such happens people should not be attacked for wanting answers especially when they have neglected their own campaigns and fights for the hollie campaign .
Read more: http://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/intimidation-and-coercion/#ixzz0qID6dLn2
These were the last 2 entries
" 149 concerned June 8, 2010 at 19:47
i am not posting to slag anyone else off i did an awful lot for the hollie campaign but did all without seeing evidence i have since seen paper work from drs in respect to examinations done and they do not signify abuse as has been previously claimed.i have seen no other evidence. i was abused by a family member and had to make a video statement to the police about it the member was arrested but cps said owing to the fact it was historical no further action,i would have presumed hollie would have made a video statement but this has never been mentioned tho it is practice to do so.i also question that if robert green and team are that sure of their evidence why they have not bought a private prosecution against the alleged abusers,i also think that anne has alot to answer for whether true or untrue the exposure hollie has had is unacceptable and places her at risk of actual abuse from paedophiles intimate details of vaginal examinations of her being posted on the net is unacceptable and as much as im no fan of social services or police they have a serious duty to investigate hollies exposure it is no conspiracy the police and social services being involved anne has bought this on all by herself for allowing her daughter to be exposed in such manner. as for all the bitching on the net from what i have seen all are as bad as each other and robert green cannot attack people for thinking differently calling them pro paedos etc robert green has stuffed things up big time for hollie and anne greig is more to blame than anyone else for allowing this to happen. i believe this will do alot of damage to robert green , brian gerrish etc and they are more concerned about that than hollie.poor hollie. anne greig cannot now moan about social services involvement she needs to start accepting what she has done to hollie is abusive in itself
150 concerned June 8, 2010 at 19:58
i would also like to add that i also advocate for people who have been falsly accused of abusing children as well as being a victim myself but i like to see actual evidence i have been stung in the past so i know from both sides had i been in robert greens situation i would have produced the evidence or instigated a private prosecution until such happens people should not be attacked for wanting answers especially when they have neglected their own campaigns and fights for the hollie campaign .
Read more: http://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/intimidation-and-coercion/#ixzz0qID6dLn2
Monday, 7 June 2010
Bilderberg 2010: Final List of Participants
Bilderberg 2010: Final List of Participants
Bilderberg Meetings
June 6, 2010
Sitges, Spain 3-6 June 2010
Final List of Participants
Honorary Chairman
BEL Davignon, Etienne Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel
DEU Ackermann, Josef Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG
GBR Agius, Marcus Chairman, Barclays Bank PLC
ESP Alierta, César Chairman and CEO, Telefónica
INT Almunia, Joaquín Commissioner, European Commission
USA Altman, Roger C. Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc.
USA Arrison, Sonia Author and policy analyst
SWE Bäckström, Urban Director General, Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
PRT Balsemão, Francisco Pinto Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.; Former Prime Minister
ITA Bernabè, Franco CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.
SWE Bildt, Carl Minister of Foreign Affairs
FIN Blåfield, Antti Senior Editorial Writer, Helsingin Sanomat
ESP Botín, Ana P. Executive Chairman, Banesto
NOR Brandtzæg, Svein Richard CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT Bronner, Oscar Publisher and Editor, Der Standard
TUR Çakir, Ruşen Journalist
CAN Campbell, Gordon Premier of British Columbia
ESP Carvajal Urquijo, Jaime Managing Director, Advent International
FRA Castries, Henri de Chairman of the Management Board and CEO, AXA
ESP Cebrián, Juan Luis CEO, PRISA
ESP Cisneros, Gustavo A. Chairman and CEO, Cisneros Group of Companies
CAN Clark, W. Edmund President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group
USA Collins, Timothy C. Senior Managing Director and CEO, Ripplewood Holdings, LLC
ITA Conti, Fulvio CEO and General Manager, Enel SpA
GRC David, George A. Chairman, Coca-Cola H.B.C. S.A.
DNK Eldrup, Anders CEO, DONG Energy
ITA Elkann, John Chairman, Fiat S.p.A.
DEU Enders, Thomas CEO, Airbus SAS
ESP Entrecanales, José M. Chairman, Acciona
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik Vice President Global Affairs, Haldor Topsøe A/S
USA Feldstein, Martin S. George F. Baker Professor of Economics, Harvard University
USA Ferguson, Niall Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History, Harvard University
AUT Fischer, Heinz Federal President
IRL Gallagher, Paul Attorney General
USA Gates, William H. Co-chair, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Chairman, Microsoft Corporation
USA Gordon, Philip H. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
USA Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
INT Gucht, Karel de Commissioner, European Commission
TUR Gürel, Z. Damla Special Adviser to the President on EU Affairs
NLD Halberstadt, Victor Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
USA Holbrooke, Richard C. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan
NLD Hommen, Jan H.M. Chairman, ING Group
USA Hormats, Robert D. Under Secretary for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs
BEL Huyghebaert, Jan Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
USA Johnson, James A. Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC
FIN Katainen, Jyrki Minister of Finance
USA Keane, John M. Senior Partner, SCP Partners
GBR Kerr, John Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc.
USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
TUR Koç, Mustafa V. Chairman, Koç Holding A.Ş.
USA Kravis, Henry R. Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Josée Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc.
INT Kroes, Neelie Commissioner, European Commission
USA Lander, Eric S. President and Director, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
FRA Lauvergeon, Anne Chairman of the Executive Board, AREVA
ESP León Gross, Bernardino Secretary General, Office of the Prime Minister
DEU Löscher, Peter Chairman of the Board of Management, Siemens AG
NOR Magnus, Birger Chairman, Storebrand ASA
CAN Mansbridge, Peter Chief Correspondent, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
USA Mathews, Jessica T. President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
CAN McKenna, Frank Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group
GBR Micklethwait, John Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
FRA Montbrial, Thierry de President, French Institute for International Relations
ITA Monti, Mario President, Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
INT Moyo, Dambisa F. Economist and Author
USA Mundie, Craig J. Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Microsoft Corporation
NOR Myklebust, Egil Former Chairman of the Board of Directors SAS, Norsk Hydro ASA
USA Naím, Moisés Editor-in-Chief, Foreign Policy
NLD Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the
ESP Nin Génova, Juan María President and CEO, La Caixa
DNK Nyrup Rasmussen, Poul Former Prime Minister
GBR Oldham, John National Clinical Lead for Quality and Productivity
FIN Ollila, Jorma Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc
USA Orszag, Peter R. Director, Office of Management and Budget
TUR Özilhan, Tuncay Chairman, Anadolu Group
ITA Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso Former Minister of Finance; President of Notre Europe
GRC Papaconstantinou, George Minister of Finance
USA Parker, Sean Managing Partner, Founders Fund
USA Pearl, Frank H. Chairman and CEO, Perseus, LLC
USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
ESP Polanco, Ignacio Chairman, Grupo PRISA
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. President and CEO, Metrolinx
FRA Ramanantsoa, Bernard Dean, HEC Paris Group
PRT Rangel, Paulo Member, European Parliament
CAN Reisman, Heather M. Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
SWE Renström, Lars President and CEO, Alfa Laval
NLD Rinnooy Kan, Alexander H.G. Chairman, Social and Economic Council of the Netherlands (SER)
ITA Rocca, Gianfelice Chairman, Techint
ESP Rodriguez Inciarte, Matías Executive Vice Chairman, Grupo Santander
USA Rose, Charlie Producer, Rose Communications
USA Rubin, Robert E. Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
TUR Sabanci Dinçer, Suzan Chairman, Akbank
ITA Scaroni, Paolo CEO, Eni S.p.A.
USA Schmidt, Eric CEO and Chairman of the Board, Google
AUT Scholten, Rudolf Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
DEU Scholz, Olaf Vice Chairman, SPD
INT Sheeran, Josette Executive Director, United Nations World Food Programme
INT Solana Madariaga, Javier Former Secretary General, Council of the European Union
ESP Spain, H.M. the Queen of
USA Steinberg, James B. Deputy Secretary of State
INT Stigson, Björn President, World Business Council for Sustainable Development
USA Summers, Lawrence H. Director, National Economic Council
IRL Sutherland, Peter D. Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
GBR Taylor, J. Martin Chairman, Syngenta International AG
PRT Teixeira dos Santos, Fernando Minister of State and Finance
USA Thiel, Peter A. President, Clarium Capital Management, LLC
GRC Tsoukalis, Loukas President, ELIAMEP
INT Tumpel-Gugerell, Gertrude Member of the Executive Board, European Central Bank
USA Varney, Christine A. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust
CHE Vasella, Daniel L. Chairman, Novartis AG
USA Volcker, Paul A. Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board
CHE Voser, Peter CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
FIN Wahlroos, Björn Chairman, Sampo plc
CHE Waldvogel, Francis A. Chairman, Novartis Venture Fund
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob Chairman, Investor AB
NLD Wellink, Nout President, De Nederlandsche Bank
USA West, F.J. Bing Author
GBR Williams, Shirley Member, House of Lords
USA Wolfensohn, James D. Chairman, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC
ESP Zapatero, José Luis Rodríguez Prime Minister
DEU Zetsche, Dieter Chairman, Daimler AG
INT Zoellick, Robert B. President, The World Bank Group
Rapporteurs
GBR Bredow, Vendeline von Business Correspondent, The Economist
GBR Wooldridge, Adrian D. Business Correspondent, The Economist
Editor comment: This is the official participant list direct from Bilderberg. We have to remember that many participants request that their names not be added, as we covered in 2008 when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama attended the Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly Virginia under a cloak of secrecy, so there are likely to be more attendees who were not included on the list.
The fact that Bilderberg has gone from attempting to hide the very existence of their meetings to now being forced to issue an official participant list shows how far we have come in bringing their activities to light.
Find out more information about Bilderberg by visiting our Bilderberg Master Page or watch Alex Jones’ expose of Bilderberg’s agenda in his documentary film Endgame, which can be viewed in full for free below. Support the film maker by buying a DVD copy or signing up for Prison Planet.tv to watch the high quality version online along with a plethora of other doumentary films.
Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Don't Tread On Me Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are "they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU be the next victim? Learn the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
Social bookmarksEmail this article Print this pageComment Terms Of Use
Login
Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register
Lost your password?
31 Responses to “Bilderberg 2010: Final List of Participants”
keith4130 Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 6:39 am
Notice many notable US figures are not there, they cannot stand the resulting public attention. We are starting to win. Bilderberg, CFR and Trilateral are war criminals and murderers of US Service Personnel to their ends, along with hundreds of thousands of others. They will be held accountable. FU Bilderberg and CFR lurkers, human waste filth scum, traitors, murderers.
“Military Men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy” …. Quote by Henry Kissinger (Council on Foreign Relations), Bilderberg attendee this year, and for decades past. Traitor maggot filth murderer
ectoendomezo Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 11:56 am
AGREED!
ONE OTHER ASPECT IS:
IF THEY’RE INVITING THE LIKES OF BILL-MICROSOFT ‘HUMAN BARCODE’ READERS WON’T WORK-GATES…..AND BOB-CITIGROUP-RUBIN….AND ‘HENRY-WHY IS HE CONSIDERED INTELLIGENT WHEN EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES TURNS TO $HIT-KISSINGER….AND…PETER ORSZAG..
I MEAN..ITS AS IF THE ‘BILDERBERGERS’ WERE PURPOSELY TRYING TO PUT TOGETHER THE…MOST…INCOMPETANT “GROUP” POSSIBLE!
FRANKLY..SEEING “BOB RUBIN” AND “BIL GATES” ON THE LIST..MAKES ME BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF..
CAUSE IF ITS ‘WINDOWS” THEY’RE THINKING ABOUT USING AS THE “CAMP SOFTWARE” FOR EXAMPLE…THEN…UMMM…WELL..CAN YOYU SAY..”SYSTEM ERROR”?
AND IF ITS BOB RUBIN THEY’RE LOOKING TO FOR “ECONOMIC INTUITION”…WELL..CAN YOU SAY: CITIGROUP FAILED…US ECONOMY..FAILED..HARVARD ENDOWMENT..FAILED…LITERALLY EVERYTHING THE IDIOT TOUCHES …..FAILS. IF HE WERE A CARD PLAYER…HE’D NEVER WIN A HAND..
AS IS THE CASE WITH MOST OF THESE SCUMBAGS..WHO COULD BE SUMMED UP WITH ONE PARAGRAPH:
..”WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FOR EITHER ONE GREAT IDEA IN THEIR PAST..OR PURE CORRRUPT POWER POLITICS AND THE HARD WORK OF THEIR LONG-GONE YOUTH”
ITS THAT SIMPLE!
I MEAN..ALL ONE NEED DO..IS..UMM..TURN ONES HEAD TO EITHER SIDE OR UP OR DOWN AND…SHAZAM! “THIS” IS THEIR………….UUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH….”PLAN”?
HMMMMM..OKAY..ME SUPER SKEERED..ME SO FRIEGHTENED….ME WANT TO HIDE FROM DANGEROUSLY STUPID BURGLERPILFER GROUP!
THEY SHOULD CHANGE THEIR NAME TO THE “LOSER-POSERS GROUP”!
STARMAN Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 3:23 pm
THE R’S ARE MISSING ….. ROCKEFELLER AND ROTHSCHILD ,,, PUPPETS WILL DO .
JamesB Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 3:27 pm
Hello, I am new here and as an American Patriot appreciate the efforts you all are putting forth. I just want to ask a couple of questions and make a couple of statements to understand where this is going.
1. The bilderbergers, G8, G20, trilaterals, et cetera meet regularly.
2. They continue to do so.
3. Kissinger is involved to the hilt as he has been for 50 years and he doesn’t seem to be going anywhere.
4. Obama is in power and passing ever more restrictive laws.
5. The world economy is breaking down.
6. American Idol and Eurovision get more viewers than ever before.
7. Most of the civilians I talk to about the NWO call me a conspiracy theorist, they laugh, snort and change the subject.
8. The NWO seems to be going strong and the takeover of America is moving right along.
9. Those of us prepping are former and current military, law enforcement and others in the know and don’t seem to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Doesn’t it seem logical that the NWO has anticipated these actions? They don’t really seem to be ‘on the run’, if anything they are ratcheting up their actions and cracking down harder every day.
Will there ever be a straw that breaks the camel’s back?
Would our Founding Fathers have put up with even a fraction of this treatment?
It is true that who fires the first shot loses the battle but I hope to God that there are enough of us out there ready to fire the second.
I for one refuse to be dragged off to a camp as non-compliant. Blue, red or yellow list be damned.
Sorry to take up so much space, first post.
ex pat Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:01 am
nice now we can see what Canadians attended and ask them what they was doing at the meeting……..
expose them all.
Vic Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:09 am
For Canadians to know and see
Time to boycott these people and their business no??
CAN Reisman, Heather M. Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc. is part of the bilderberg meetings.
I for one will boycott this Indigo business from now on.
and what about: CAN Campbell, Gordon Premier of British Columbia ????
CAN Clark, W. Edmund President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group
CAN Mansbridge, Peter Chief Correspondent, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
CAN McKenna, Frank Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. President and CEO, Metrolinx
NOw people who conspire to regulate the lives of the many have not been elected by the many to do so.
Who are they to want to rule and abuse the many????
Vic Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:11 am
These Canadians must understand that the many will not take anymore of this silly abuse.
building warships is evil period. War is not what the creator wants in the first place.How can the Canadian people let a government wate the tax payers money in warfare????
We have needs that are real needs but War it is time to tell our leaders to stop serving the war lords.
Vic Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:12 am
waste not wate sorry for my mistake here.
frankpatriot Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:13 am
There’s a company called DONG Energy?
darell2207 Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:04 am
Yes there is. The biggest energy-company in Denmark.
He (Anders Eldrup) has a lot of influence in DK, and is also former chief of department in the department of treasury. What a coincidence.
For further info on the other danes on the list:
Ulrik Fiederspiel is former chief in the department of foreign relations.
Poul Nyrup Rasmussen is former prime minister of Denmark. But he is quite open about that he is going to bilderberg this. It even says so on his website that he is going, but no danish media is picking up on anything.
It’s f---ing ridiculous.
Vic Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:15 am
Can we see the names on that list are people in positions that can manipulate the people’s opinions and beliefs????
In Canada Peter Mansbridge, is a well known television reporter. How can such people like to serve peopl who love abusing the many??? I will never understand this.
A good person would not buy this crap of some powerful elites.
NoMoBaama Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:42 am
Look long and hard at the list of scumbags, traitors and eugenicists who want nothing more than to bankrupt the world and kill 80% of the world’s population. At least now the paper emperors and empresses have no clothes, and are naked for the world to see.
Larry Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:52 am
It looks like a lot of the heavies aren’t there like Zbignew or David Rockefeller. Lots less attendance from the US.
yup we dead Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:17 am
How we gonna fit all those faces onto one deck of cards?
TheGreatGazoo Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
We gonna need a UNO Deck !! lmfao
randall Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:20 am
I see some dude from Coca Cola is there. George A. David. Looks like I’ll have to write coke an e-mail and tell them I wont be drinking their stuff any more.
jamie Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 10:28 am
You shouldn’t be drinking it to begin with.
Secrent Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 11:04 am
To bad couldn’t do a mass arrest for crimes to hummanity.
TheGreatGazoo Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:14 pm
it’s comin…….so are the fema camps and the downfall of the USA….and when the USA falls…….Well People, It’s like this…….say goodbye to the good times for ANY country!!
Funny, Haven’t we heard polititians turn around on the crowd and say ” The Good Times are Over” ???? Yep, We sure have………….Biden said it…………and a few others.
What a bold smartelic batch Joe Biden is……….cocky, self centered, wanna-be …. a minion to satan is all he is though…….good luck with that Joe, you’ll get yours soon enough I’m guessin.
Wallbanger Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:13 pm
Our military, law enforcement, and ELECTED OFFICIALS need to HONOR THEIR OATH TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!
oathkeepers.org
duckandcover Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:41 pm
Next time I need another computer, I’m going with Apple instead. Screw microsoft, their products suck anyway.
Robin Shadowes Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 1:22 pm
Same here. I’ve had it with the Microsoft garbage.
Flex Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Time for this list to go VIRAL i think everybody needs to know who the scum is.
Kay Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 5:50 pm
I think “Matt Drudge” and “Viral” pretty much go together. Hehehehe!
RealityBase Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 4:02 pm
Seems like some of the heavy hitters are just sending their lackeys to attend these days. That just means that their evil doings are being forced underground. A guy like Kissinger is there as he’s just whoring himself out along with his company. Ruining the world and lining his pockets is a high priority for him.
Delta56ca Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Well isn,t it nice to see Canadians being represented.. by the looks of it …It seems we have very good representation at the Bilderberg group…What I see is finance & media flying the Canadian flag there.Hey there,s even a Premier there too. Maybe he got his trip paid by the new HST..tax .
Kay Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 5:49 pm
Hmmmm….. Matt Drudge certainly likes Alex Jones more and more and more…..
dougwht Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
What in the the h#$l is Gordon Campbell doing there. He does not fit the bill of the bilderberg group. Unless being loathed by your whole province gives you admission. I hope he can be exposed for the lying deceitful crook that he is. I hope his attendance is exposed for BC to see.
jameswaterwolf Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 8:21 pm
Cambell is there because he’s been selling off over 600 B.C. rivers for hydro electric dam rights to foriegn interests. Yeah, he’s Bilderburg Scum alright.
mulletboy Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:53 pm
I would say this is a partial list at best. Why? It doesn’t include the high ranking members of the UN council that are always there year after year. Guys like Maurice Strong (the real guy behind the global warming mess), and Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon. So no… this list isn’t anywhere near complete.
It -will- be interesting to see what sort of global ‘changes’ come about over the next few months because of this little meeting.
enricksspaikers Says:
June 7th, 2010 at 1:55 am
I have been following the money Majik, as far as what one can not see I do not believe in “C0NSPIRACY theories” that have nothing to back them up. There is as much if not more evil perpetuated by gossip, rumors, and fake conspiracy theories as anything else you can think of. It seems like the false accusations are always what brings the fanatics crawling out of the woodworks.
sd card
Join the discussion, sign up/login to post a comment!
Bilderberg Meetings
June 6, 2010
Sitges, Spain 3-6 June 2010
Final List of Participants
Honorary Chairman
BEL Davignon, Etienne Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel
DEU Ackermann, Josef Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG
GBR Agius, Marcus Chairman, Barclays Bank PLC
ESP Alierta, César Chairman and CEO, Telefónica
INT Almunia, Joaquín Commissioner, European Commission
USA Altman, Roger C. Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc.
USA Arrison, Sonia Author and policy analyst
SWE Bäckström, Urban Director General, Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
PRT Balsemão, Francisco Pinto Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.; Former Prime Minister
ITA Bernabè, Franco CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.
SWE Bildt, Carl Minister of Foreign Affairs
FIN Blåfield, Antti Senior Editorial Writer, Helsingin Sanomat
ESP Botín, Ana P. Executive Chairman, Banesto
NOR Brandtzæg, Svein Richard CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT Bronner, Oscar Publisher and Editor, Der Standard
TUR Çakir, Ruşen Journalist
CAN Campbell, Gordon Premier of British Columbia
ESP Carvajal Urquijo, Jaime Managing Director, Advent International
FRA Castries, Henri de Chairman of the Management Board and CEO, AXA
ESP Cebrián, Juan Luis CEO, PRISA
ESP Cisneros, Gustavo A. Chairman and CEO, Cisneros Group of Companies
CAN Clark, W. Edmund President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group
USA Collins, Timothy C. Senior Managing Director and CEO, Ripplewood Holdings, LLC
ITA Conti, Fulvio CEO and General Manager, Enel SpA
GRC David, George A. Chairman, Coca-Cola H.B.C. S.A.
DNK Eldrup, Anders CEO, DONG Energy
ITA Elkann, John Chairman, Fiat S.p.A.
DEU Enders, Thomas CEO, Airbus SAS
ESP Entrecanales, José M. Chairman, Acciona
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik Vice President Global Affairs, Haldor Topsøe A/S
USA Feldstein, Martin S. George F. Baker Professor of Economics, Harvard University
USA Ferguson, Niall Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History, Harvard University
AUT Fischer, Heinz Federal President
IRL Gallagher, Paul Attorney General
USA Gates, William H. Co-chair, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Chairman, Microsoft Corporation
USA Gordon, Philip H. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
USA Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
INT Gucht, Karel de Commissioner, European Commission
TUR Gürel, Z. Damla Special Adviser to the President on EU Affairs
NLD Halberstadt, Victor Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
USA Holbrooke, Richard C. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan
NLD Hommen, Jan H.M. Chairman, ING Group
USA Hormats, Robert D. Under Secretary for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs
BEL Huyghebaert, Jan Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
USA Johnson, James A. Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC
FIN Katainen, Jyrki Minister of Finance
USA Keane, John M. Senior Partner, SCP Partners
GBR Kerr, John Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc.
USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
TUR Koç, Mustafa V. Chairman, Koç Holding A.Ş.
USA Kravis, Henry R. Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Josée Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc.
INT Kroes, Neelie Commissioner, European Commission
USA Lander, Eric S. President and Director, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
FRA Lauvergeon, Anne Chairman of the Executive Board, AREVA
ESP León Gross, Bernardino Secretary General, Office of the Prime Minister
DEU Löscher, Peter Chairman of the Board of Management, Siemens AG
NOR Magnus, Birger Chairman, Storebrand ASA
CAN Mansbridge, Peter Chief Correspondent, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
USA Mathews, Jessica T. President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
CAN McKenna, Frank Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group
GBR Micklethwait, John Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
FRA Montbrial, Thierry de President, French Institute for International Relations
ITA Monti, Mario President, Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
INT Moyo, Dambisa F. Economist and Author
USA Mundie, Craig J. Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Microsoft Corporation
NOR Myklebust, Egil Former Chairman of the Board of Directors SAS, Norsk Hydro ASA
USA Naím, Moisés Editor-in-Chief, Foreign Policy
NLD Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the
ESP Nin Génova, Juan María President and CEO, La Caixa
DNK Nyrup Rasmussen, Poul Former Prime Minister
GBR Oldham, John National Clinical Lead for Quality and Productivity
FIN Ollila, Jorma Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc
USA Orszag, Peter R. Director, Office of Management and Budget
TUR Özilhan, Tuncay Chairman, Anadolu Group
ITA Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso Former Minister of Finance; President of Notre Europe
GRC Papaconstantinou, George Minister of Finance
USA Parker, Sean Managing Partner, Founders Fund
USA Pearl, Frank H. Chairman and CEO, Perseus, LLC
USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
ESP Polanco, Ignacio Chairman, Grupo PRISA
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. President and CEO, Metrolinx
FRA Ramanantsoa, Bernard Dean, HEC Paris Group
PRT Rangel, Paulo Member, European Parliament
CAN Reisman, Heather M. Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
SWE Renström, Lars President and CEO, Alfa Laval
NLD Rinnooy Kan, Alexander H.G. Chairman, Social and Economic Council of the Netherlands (SER)
ITA Rocca, Gianfelice Chairman, Techint
ESP Rodriguez Inciarte, Matías Executive Vice Chairman, Grupo Santander
USA Rose, Charlie Producer, Rose Communications
USA Rubin, Robert E. Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
TUR Sabanci Dinçer, Suzan Chairman, Akbank
ITA Scaroni, Paolo CEO, Eni S.p.A.
USA Schmidt, Eric CEO and Chairman of the Board, Google
AUT Scholten, Rudolf Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
DEU Scholz, Olaf Vice Chairman, SPD
INT Sheeran, Josette Executive Director, United Nations World Food Programme
INT Solana Madariaga, Javier Former Secretary General, Council of the European Union
ESP Spain, H.M. the Queen of
USA Steinberg, James B. Deputy Secretary of State
INT Stigson, Björn President, World Business Council for Sustainable Development
USA Summers, Lawrence H. Director, National Economic Council
IRL Sutherland, Peter D. Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
GBR Taylor, J. Martin Chairman, Syngenta International AG
PRT Teixeira dos Santos, Fernando Minister of State and Finance
USA Thiel, Peter A. President, Clarium Capital Management, LLC
GRC Tsoukalis, Loukas President, ELIAMEP
INT Tumpel-Gugerell, Gertrude Member of the Executive Board, European Central Bank
USA Varney, Christine A. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust
CHE Vasella, Daniel L. Chairman, Novartis AG
USA Volcker, Paul A. Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board
CHE Voser, Peter CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
FIN Wahlroos, Björn Chairman, Sampo plc
CHE Waldvogel, Francis A. Chairman, Novartis Venture Fund
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob Chairman, Investor AB
NLD Wellink, Nout President, De Nederlandsche Bank
USA West, F.J. Bing Author
GBR Williams, Shirley Member, House of Lords
USA Wolfensohn, James D. Chairman, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC
ESP Zapatero, José Luis Rodríguez Prime Minister
DEU Zetsche, Dieter Chairman, Daimler AG
INT Zoellick, Robert B. President, The World Bank Group
Rapporteurs
GBR Bredow, Vendeline von Business Correspondent, The Economist
GBR Wooldridge, Adrian D. Business Correspondent, The Economist
Editor comment: This is the official participant list direct from Bilderberg. We have to remember that many participants request that their names not be added, as we covered in 2008 when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama attended the Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly Virginia under a cloak of secrecy, so there are likely to be more attendees who were not included on the list.
The fact that Bilderberg has gone from attempting to hide the very existence of their meetings to now being forced to issue an official participant list shows how far we have come in bringing their activities to light.
Find out more information about Bilderberg by visiting our Bilderberg Master Page or watch Alex Jones’ expose of Bilderberg’s agenda in his documentary film Endgame, which can be viewed in full for free below. Support the film maker by buying a DVD copy or signing up for Prison Planet.tv to watch the high quality version online along with a plethora of other doumentary films.
Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Don't Tread On Me Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are "they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU be the next victim? Learn the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
Social bookmarksEmail this article Print this pageComment Terms Of Use
Login
Username:
Password:
Remember me
Register
Lost your password?
31 Responses to “Bilderberg 2010: Final List of Participants”
keith4130 Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 6:39 am
Notice many notable US figures are not there, they cannot stand the resulting public attention. We are starting to win. Bilderberg, CFR and Trilateral are war criminals and murderers of US Service Personnel to their ends, along with hundreds of thousands of others. They will be held accountable. FU Bilderberg and CFR lurkers, human waste filth scum, traitors, murderers.
“Military Men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy” …. Quote by Henry Kissinger (Council on Foreign Relations), Bilderberg attendee this year, and for decades past. Traitor maggot filth murderer
ectoendomezo Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 11:56 am
AGREED!
ONE OTHER ASPECT IS:
IF THEY’RE INVITING THE LIKES OF BILL-MICROSOFT ‘HUMAN BARCODE’ READERS WON’T WORK-GATES…..AND BOB-CITIGROUP-RUBIN….AND ‘HENRY-WHY IS HE CONSIDERED INTELLIGENT WHEN EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES TURNS TO $HIT-KISSINGER….AND…PETER ORSZAG..
I MEAN..ITS AS IF THE ‘BILDERBERGERS’ WERE PURPOSELY TRYING TO PUT TOGETHER THE…MOST…INCOMPETANT “GROUP” POSSIBLE!
FRANKLY..SEEING “BOB RUBIN” AND “BIL GATES” ON THE LIST..MAKES ME BREATH A SIGH OF RELIEF..
CAUSE IF ITS ‘WINDOWS” THEY’RE THINKING ABOUT USING AS THE “CAMP SOFTWARE” FOR EXAMPLE…THEN…UMMM…WELL..CAN YOYU SAY..”SYSTEM ERROR”?
AND IF ITS BOB RUBIN THEY’RE LOOKING TO FOR “ECONOMIC INTUITION”…WELL..CAN YOU SAY: CITIGROUP FAILED…US ECONOMY..FAILED..HARVARD ENDOWMENT..FAILED…LITERALLY EVERYTHING THE IDIOT TOUCHES …..FAILS. IF HE WERE A CARD PLAYER…HE’D NEVER WIN A HAND..
AS IS THE CASE WITH MOST OF THESE SCUMBAGS..WHO COULD BE SUMMED UP WITH ONE PARAGRAPH:
..”WEALTHY AND POWERFUL FOR EITHER ONE GREAT IDEA IN THEIR PAST..OR PURE CORRRUPT POWER POLITICS AND THE HARD WORK OF THEIR LONG-GONE YOUTH”
ITS THAT SIMPLE!
I MEAN..ALL ONE NEED DO..IS..UMM..TURN ONES HEAD TO EITHER SIDE OR UP OR DOWN AND…SHAZAM! “THIS” IS THEIR………….UUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH….”PLAN”?
HMMMMM..OKAY..ME SUPER SKEERED..ME SO FRIEGHTENED….ME WANT TO HIDE FROM DANGEROUSLY STUPID BURGLERPILFER GROUP!
THEY SHOULD CHANGE THEIR NAME TO THE “LOSER-POSERS GROUP”!
STARMAN Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 3:23 pm
THE R’S ARE MISSING ….. ROCKEFELLER AND ROTHSCHILD ,,, PUPPETS WILL DO .
JamesB Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 3:27 pm
Hello, I am new here and as an American Patriot appreciate the efforts you all are putting forth. I just want to ask a couple of questions and make a couple of statements to understand where this is going.
1. The bilderbergers, G8, G20, trilaterals, et cetera meet regularly.
2. They continue to do so.
3. Kissinger is involved to the hilt as he has been for 50 years and he doesn’t seem to be going anywhere.
4. Obama is in power and passing ever more restrictive laws.
5. The world economy is breaking down.
6. American Idol and Eurovision get more viewers than ever before.
7. Most of the civilians I talk to about the NWO call me a conspiracy theorist, they laugh, snort and change the subject.
8. The NWO seems to be going strong and the takeover of America is moving right along.
9. Those of us prepping are former and current military, law enforcement and others in the know and don’t seem to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Doesn’t it seem logical that the NWO has anticipated these actions? They don’t really seem to be ‘on the run’, if anything they are ratcheting up their actions and cracking down harder every day.
Will there ever be a straw that breaks the camel’s back?
Would our Founding Fathers have put up with even a fraction of this treatment?
It is true that who fires the first shot loses the battle but I hope to God that there are enough of us out there ready to fire the second.
I for one refuse to be dragged off to a camp as non-compliant. Blue, red or yellow list be damned.
Sorry to take up so much space, first post.
ex pat Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:01 am
nice now we can see what Canadians attended and ask them what they was doing at the meeting……..
expose them all.
Vic Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:09 am
For Canadians to know and see
Time to boycott these people and their business no??
CAN Reisman, Heather M. Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc. is part of the bilderberg meetings.
I for one will boycott this Indigo business from now on.
and what about: CAN Campbell, Gordon Premier of British Columbia ????
CAN Clark, W. Edmund President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group
CAN Mansbridge, Peter Chief Correspondent, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
CAN McKenna, Frank Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. President and CEO, Metrolinx
NOw people who conspire to regulate the lives of the many have not been elected by the many to do so.
Who are they to want to rule and abuse the many????
Vic Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:11 am
These Canadians must understand that the many will not take anymore of this silly abuse.
building warships is evil period. War is not what the creator wants in the first place.How can the Canadian people let a government wate the tax payers money in warfare????
We have needs that are real needs but War it is time to tell our leaders to stop serving the war lords.
Vic Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:12 am
waste not wate sorry for my mistake here.
frankpatriot Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:13 am
There’s a company called DONG Energy?
darell2207 Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:04 am
Yes there is. The biggest energy-company in Denmark.
He (Anders Eldrup) has a lot of influence in DK, and is also former chief of department in the department of treasury. What a coincidence.
For further info on the other danes on the list:
Ulrik Fiederspiel is former chief in the department of foreign relations.
Poul Nyrup Rasmussen is former prime minister of Denmark. But he is quite open about that he is going to bilderberg this. It even says so on his website that he is going, but no danish media is picking up on anything.
It’s f---ing ridiculous.
Vic Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:15 am
Can we see the names on that list are people in positions that can manipulate the people’s opinions and beliefs????
In Canada Peter Mansbridge, is a well known television reporter. How can such people like to serve peopl who love abusing the many??? I will never understand this.
A good person would not buy this crap of some powerful elites.
NoMoBaama Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:42 am
Look long and hard at the list of scumbags, traitors and eugenicists who want nothing more than to bankrupt the world and kill 80% of the world’s population. At least now the paper emperors and empresses have no clothes, and are naked for the world to see.
Larry Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 7:52 am
It looks like a lot of the heavies aren’t there like Zbignew or David Rockefeller. Lots less attendance from the US.
yup we dead Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:17 am
How we gonna fit all those faces onto one deck of cards?
TheGreatGazoo Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
We gonna need a UNO Deck !! lmfao
randall Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:20 am
I see some dude from Coca Cola is there. George A. David. Looks like I’ll have to write coke an e-mail and tell them I wont be drinking their stuff any more.
jamie Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 10:28 am
You shouldn’t be drinking it to begin with.
Secrent Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 11:04 am
To bad couldn’t do a mass arrest for crimes to hummanity.
TheGreatGazoo Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:14 pm
it’s comin…….so are the fema camps and the downfall of the USA….and when the USA falls…….Well People, It’s like this…….say goodbye to the good times for ANY country!!
Funny, Haven’t we heard polititians turn around on the crowd and say ” The Good Times are Over” ???? Yep, We sure have………….Biden said it…………and a few others.
What a bold smartelic batch Joe Biden is……….cocky, self centered, wanna-be …. a minion to satan is all he is though…….good luck with that Joe, you’ll get yours soon enough I’m guessin.
Wallbanger Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:13 pm
Our military, law enforcement, and ELECTED OFFICIALS need to HONOR THEIR OATH TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!
oathkeepers.org
duckandcover Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 12:41 pm
Next time I need another computer, I’m going with Apple instead. Screw microsoft, their products suck anyway.
Robin Shadowes Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 1:22 pm
Same here. I’ve had it with the Microsoft garbage.
Flex Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Time for this list to go VIRAL i think everybody needs to know who the scum is.
Kay Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 5:50 pm
I think “Matt Drudge” and “Viral” pretty much go together. Hehehehe!
RealityBase Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 4:02 pm
Seems like some of the heavy hitters are just sending their lackeys to attend these days. That just means that their evil doings are being forced underground. A guy like Kissinger is there as he’s just whoring himself out along with his company. Ruining the world and lining his pockets is a high priority for him.
Delta56ca Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Well isn,t it nice to see Canadians being represented.. by the looks of it …It seems we have very good representation at the Bilderberg group…What I see is finance & media flying the Canadian flag there.Hey there,s even a Premier there too. Maybe he got his trip paid by the new HST..tax .
Kay Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 5:49 pm
Hmmmm….. Matt Drudge certainly likes Alex Jones more and more and more…..
dougwht Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
What in the the h#$l is Gordon Campbell doing there. He does not fit the bill of the bilderberg group. Unless being loathed by your whole province gives you admission. I hope he can be exposed for the lying deceitful crook that he is. I hope his attendance is exposed for BC to see.
jameswaterwolf Reply:
June 6th, 2010 at 8:21 pm
Cambell is there because he’s been selling off over 600 B.C. rivers for hydro electric dam rights to foriegn interests. Yeah, he’s Bilderburg Scum alright.
mulletboy Says:
June 6th, 2010 at 9:53 pm
I would say this is a partial list at best. Why? It doesn’t include the high ranking members of the UN council that are always there year after year. Guys like Maurice Strong (the real guy behind the global warming mess), and Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon. So no… this list isn’t anywhere near complete.
It -will- be interesting to see what sort of global ‘changes’ come about over the next few months because of this little meeting.
enricksspaikers Says:
June 7th, 2010 at 1:55 am
I have been following the money Majik, as far as what one can not see I do not believe in “C0NSPIRACY theories” that have nothing to back them up. There is as much if not more evil perpetuated by gossip, rumors, and fake conspiracy theories as anything else you can think of. It seems like the false accusations are always what brings the fanatics crawling out of the woodworks.
sd card
Join the discussion, sign up/login to post a comment!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)