GRAHAM OVENDEN THE PAEDOPHILE ARTIST IN JAIL

IT TOOK A LONG ENOUGH BATTLE TO GET THIS FILTHY CREEP BEHIND BARS. THE SCALES OF JUSTICE ARE STILL TIPPED DANGEROUSLY LOW FOR VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE - AS I'VE SAID BEFORE, THE VICTIMS ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO FIND THEMSELVES BEHIND BARS THAN THE OFFENDERS.

I HOPE THERE IS MORE SOAP THAN DRUGS IN THE JAIL WHERE THEY PUT HIM!

THERE'S OTHERS WHO SHOULD BE IN THERE WITH HIM, HIS AIDING AND ABETTING AND ENABLING FRIENDS AND MASTERS. I WON'T NAME NAMES, FOR A START OFF I DON'T NEED TO, BUT IF I DID THEY WOULD PROBABLY START UP ANOTHER VENDETTA AGAINST ME AND GET DAVID CAMERON TO DO ANOTHER STUNT WITH PHILIP SCHOFIELD AND THREATEN ME WITH LIBEL AND ISOLATE ME EVEN MORE ECT ECT ECT. WE ALL KNOW HOW IT WORKS NOW AND IT STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2451120/Artist-Graham-Ovenden-jailed-years-Court-Appeal-original-sentence-unduly-lenient.html

'Not a shred of remorse': Disgraced artist Graham Ovenden is jailed for two years after original sentence for sex offences deemed 'unduly lenient'

Committee quashed suspended sentence in the case of Graham Ovenden
Originally received 12 months imprisonment suspended for two years
Ovenden convicted of six charges of indecency with a child and one allegation of indecent assault relating to three girls
Court ruled that the sentence should not have been suspended and the correct total to be imposed today was a term of 27 months
Judges also heard a bid by Ovenden, who had denied the charges against him, to challenge his conviction

But court rejected the application for permission to appeal, ruling that the verdicts were 'safe'


By Anna Edwards

PUBLISHED:16:41, 9 October 2013| UPDATED:17:50, 9 October 2013








8 shares

4

View
comments


Artist Graham Ovenden, who avoided prison after being found guilty of sex offences against children, was jailed for two years and three months by Court of Appeal judges today when they ruled that his non-custodial sentence was 'unduly lenient'.

Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, sitting with two other judges in London, quashed the suspended sentence imposed in June in the case of Graham Ovenden, 70, of Barley Splatt near Bodmin Moor in Cornwall.

Ovenden, who was accused of abusing children who posed for his paintings in the 70s and 80s, originally received 12 months imprisonment suspended for two years at Plymouth Crown Court, but the sentence was referred to appeal judges by Attorney General Dominic Grieve.

Ovenden, who was present in court for the hearing, was convicted of six charges of indecency with a child and one allegation of indecent assault relating to three girls

As well as the sentence review, the judges also heard a bid by Ovenden, who had denied the charges against him, to challenge his conviction.

But the court rejected the application for permission to appeal, ruling that the verdicts were 'safe'.

Ovenden, who was present in court for the hearing, was convicted of six charges of indecency with a child and one allegation of indecent assault relating to three girls.

Lord Thomas, who said Ovenden had not shown a 'shred of remorse' for his victims, ruled that the sentence should not have been suspended and the correct total to be imposed today was a term of 27 months.

Ovenden claimed that his interest in young girls was artistic and not sexual - but that claim was rejected by the three judges.

Lord Thomas said the girls had 'no understanding of the true purpose' behind what Ovenden was doing.
Lord Thomas said Ovenden had shown 'no contrition' BY maintaining that he had done nothing wrong
'There was no doubt that his purpose was sexual. There is no doubt that he had a sexual interest in children.'

When considering the appropriate sentence the court had to have regard to the fact that the only mitigation Ovenden had was his former good character and his age.

Lord Thomas added that against that 'there are a very large number of aggravating factors'.

Those factors included the 'comparison in age between the victims and his own age at the time the offences were committed' and the number of victims.

But the 'most serious' was the 'very serious abuse of the position of trust' that he had in relation to the girls.

His reputation as a landscape artist enabled those who were closest to the children to trust him, said Lord Thomas.

There was also the factor of the 'very serious impact on the victims, magnified by the way in which he had grossly manipulated them and degraded them by the photographs he had taken'.

Lord Thomas said the court had seen victim impact statements from the three victims in which they described how giving evidence at Ovenden's trial was the worst experience of their lives.

When suspending the prison term, the sentencing judge said he took into account Ovenden's age, the length of time since the offences, and his 'steep fall from grace and irretrievably tarnished reputation'.


It was argued on behalf of the Attorney General that 'reputational impact' on him was not a reason for suspending the sentence and it was 'wrong in principle' to take that into account.


Exceptional circumstances were required for a sentence to be suspended.


Lord Thomas said Ovenden had shown 'no contrition', maintaining that he had done nothing wrong, and that as an artist he seeks to 'capture the innocence of children in a state of grace'.


He claimed he was the victim of a 'global witch-hunt against artists'.



Ovenden claimed that his interest in young girls was artistic and not sexual

Lord Thomas said: 'He seeks to blame others and asserts a conspiracy against him. It is self-evident he has no understanding of the very serious harm he has done to the victims by his serious criminal misconduct.


'He still asserts that art is being put on trial. That is nonsensical bearing in mind the facts.'


Speaking after the hearing, the Attorney General said: 'Graham Ovenden committed terrible sexual offences against vulnerable young girls who were in his charge and ought to have felt safe. He manipulated them and abused his position of trust.

'The Court of Appeal agrees that the 12-month suspended sentence handed to him was unduly lenient, and I am satisfied they have replaced it with 27 months custody.

'It is right that sexual crimes, whether committed many years ago or more recently, should be punished appropriately.

'Today the court affirmed this and sent a clear message that people who have behaved in this way in the past will face the consequences through the courts.'

Under the early tutelage of the 'godfather of Pop Art' Sir Peter Blake, Ovenden embarked on a career which catalogued life on the streets of London, landscapes of the countryside, and portraiture of children.

He had been tutored by Lord David Cecil and Sir John Betjeman, with his work displayed across the world including exhibitions at London's Victoria and Albert Museum, The Tate and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.

In 1975 he founded the Brotherhood of Ruralists movement - artists who had left the city to live in the countryside.

The Azimuth Trust paedophile ring

LORD CHADLINGTON

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2334163/Revealed-The-incredibly-close-links-Google-politicians-refuse-step-porn-row.html

Revealed: The incredibly close links between Google and the politicians who refuse to step in to porn row
Both David Cameron and George Osborne have met with Google executives
Google boss Eric Schmidt is a trusted business advisor to Mr Cameron

By Sam Greenhill

PUBLISHED:22:39, 31 May 2013 | UPDATED:11:00, 1 June 2013

201shares

143

View
comments


Google’s refusal to block grotesque child abuse websites is matched by the refusal of ministers to intervene.

But why is the Government so strangely reluctant to tackle the internet search company?

Google barely pays any tax and merrily snoops on Britons with its notorious Street View cars, so it is not as if ministers lack any provocation.

Close: There appears to be a number of links between internet giant Google and the Conservative government

Google has been allowed to carve itself a reputation as a big friendly giant of the corporate world, brimming with ethical compassion and coolness.

Gradually, the corporation’s ruthless streak is being exposed, but actually confronting the internet mammoth seems to be the last thing on the minds of ministers.

More...
Violent online porn drove pervert to kill my Jane: Mother, 81, believes daughter would still be alive if internet giants had listened to her calls to ban sick websites
Cable leads calls for internet giant to proactively block vile child porn as research reveals one in six who watch it go on to abuse


By stunning coincidence, the cosy links between Google and the upper echelons of the Conservative Party could scarcely be more entangled.

On a beautiful summer’s day at a society wedding in Oxfordshire last year, the nexus was all too clearly illustrated.


David Cameron, accompanied by his wife Samantha and their daughter Florence, was among the congregation clapping enthusiastically outside a pretty Cotswold church.

Working relationship: Both Prime Minister David Cameron, left, and Chancellor George Osborne, right, have held meetings with Google executives


The bride was Naomi Gummer, 29, a senior Google executive with the brief of ‘public policy’.

She was previously a political adviser to Jeremy Hunt when he was Culture Secretary in charge of internet regulation – so he was in attendance too, resplendent in his morning suit.

The wedding guests quaffed champagne in the sunshine and congratulated proud father-of- the-bride Lord Chadlington, 70, who happens to be the president of Mr Cameron’s local constituency association.


He is also a PR adviser to the Conservative Party. But Miss Gummer is far from the most senior Google executive to bask in the collective adulation of the British Government.

Former employee: Rachel Whetstone, Google's top global spinner, was a Number 10 aide and was director of communications for Conservative leader Michael Howard. The pair are pictured together

Rachel Whetstone, Google’s top global spinner, is a former No 10 aide and was Michael Howard’s director of communications when he was Tory leader.

She is married to Steve Hilton, the T-shirt-wearing guru who is Mr Cameron’s close friend and former director of strategy at No 10.

The power couple are regarded as key members of the Notting Hill set of Conservatives who propelled Mr Cameron to Downing Street, and at one stage Miss Whetstone was known as their queen.

Meanwhile the Prime Minister is godfather to Miss Whetstone’s younger son, and Mr Hilton was godfather to Ivan Cameron, the late eldest child of David and Samantha.

The links do not end there, for Google has been assiduous at forging close ties at every level of Government.

It is not just a case of former government policy wonks exiting through Westminster’s ‘revolving door’ to Google – it works the other way too.

Amy Fisher was once Google’s PR chief for European affairs, but now she has bagged a job advising Justice Secretary Chris Grayling.

And nor is it just Conservative politicians to whom Google offers the bosom of friendship. Sarah Hunter, the internet giant’s head of public policy in the UK, is a former media adviser to Tony Blair.


And a lobbying veteran named D. J. Collins – a close friend of David Miliband and well-connected in New Labour circles – has in recent years been Google’s European director of communications.


Google spends a fortune on political lobbying, and politicians from all parties lap up the Google brand, delighted to be associated with its hip image.

Before becoming Prime Minister, Mr Cameron spoke to the annual Google Zeitgeist conference in 2006 and 2007.

Powerful: Google boss Eric Schmidt is a trusted member of David Cameron's council of business advisors

Since the 2010 election, Mr Cameron has met Google executives three times, while Chancellor George Osborne has held four meetings.

Culture minister Ed Vaizey has met the firm’s staff seven times, and universities minister David Willetts has held at least one meeting.

The symbiotic relationship was on show again last year when the Chancellor agreed to open Google Campus, a hi-tech centre in East London for start-up technology firms.

With Google’s chairman, Eric Schmidt, a trusted member of Mr Cameron’s council of business advisers, critics wonder if there is any chance the PM will take steps to rein in the internet giant.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2334163/Revealed-The-incredibly-close-links-Google-politicians-refuse-step-porn-row.html#ixzz2h7Bxd5lZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

OPEN LETTER TO ANDREW PARKER HEAD OF MI5

Dear Sir,

It's quicker for me to write to you like this (although I will also send this letter to you by post, if the moleblockers allow you to even get the letter though, as when I tried to write to DC Phil Ruskin and Stafford Police's moleblockers ended up intercepting the letter instead) as I know you will get it pretty much straight away this way, seeing that your people scrutinise everything I do and say.

Please can you tell me why MI5 are covering up the Pindown child abuse and police investigations? Can you tell me what on earth institutional child abuse has to do with MI5? Could you also tell me (and I'm not blaming you for this as it happened before your time) why MI5 was involved in helping American paedophiles members of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation go round the world to promote their pro paedophile junk science theories, that are being used in secret family courts all round the world, such as Parental Alienation Syndrome and Muchausens By Proxy Syndrome and False memory Syndrome and Attachment Syndrome?

Please can you also tell me why MI5 have been stalking victims of institutional child abuse, parking cars outside their houses, spying on them from bed and breakfast places near to where they live, intercepting their telephones and hacking their computers? Could you tell me why MI5 employs people who do that sort of thing? Could you also tell me how it can be an appropriate for a Birmingham MP to also be a member of the Secret Services - I am talking about the mysterious John Hemming, who has pretended to care about victims of child abuse but who is a double dealing rascal with some very dubious friends.

I don't suppose you will be allowed to get the postal version of this letter, but at least you might get chance to read it on my blog.

Barbara Richards

HACKERS

Since posting on Twitter about the Teresa Cooper Senior Police Officer letter cover up, someone has tried to hack my Blogger account.

I don't need three guesses and a magic fairy cake to sus out who is responsible.

LAUGH IN THE DEVILS FACE

Satan is the enemy of God and he's dragged the human race into the row, by tempting Adam and Eve to steal the forbidden fruit, which was NOT an apple (as some people keep saying it was) but the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil.

God didn't want Adam and Eve to know about good and evil, he just wanted them to be innocent and enjoy the beauty he had created for them, and to walk with them in the garden he created for them.

The devil is a liar. He tries to whisper things into peoples ears that either aren't true or that are half truths, to cause division and dischord. Deliberate lies, to cause people to hate one another. The devil hates mankind.

Jesus Christ told us to love one another. In Uncle Toms Cabin, Uncle Tom prays for the tyrant who ends up murdering him, Tom earnestly prays for that mans soul to his dying breath, as Tom knows that the fate of unrepentant murderers is eternal damnation and Tom's eyes are fixed on the promises and prophesies of God. Jesus prayed forgiveness to the men who murdered him, because Jesus knew where he was going, and where they were going, and even in his agony it grieved his soul.

People are waiting for WW3, not realising that it is happening right now. We're at war right now, its a spiritual war of good v evil. I am a Christian, and my weapon, my sword and my shield is my faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, his love for me as he died in agony on the cross 2000 years ago, for me, for my race, for the human race.

We who know the Lord can laugh, in spite of our agony, we can laugh because we know the ending of the epic story that is the Human Race v the devil. The Lord told us the end of the story right at the very beginning. We are so weak, so frail, yet in spite of all that our faith in the Lord Jesus Christ will move mountains.

All you who plot evil against the most vulnerable hear this - you plot against your own pathetic selves every time you plot evil against us. You can't cover anything up, the Lord Jesus Christ wont let you, and when you yourselves are dead everything you have done will be read out from the angels scroll, its all recorded, everything, and nothing is hidden.

The Lord loves happiness, joy, beauty, truth, integrity and is a creator, not a wrecker.

GOJAM OF THE NEEDLE BLOG HAS PUT ME FIRMLY IN MY PLACE!

by gojam | September 30, 2013 · 1:29 pm

↓ Jump to Comments

Eric Pickles: Doctor ? Lawyer ?


Eric Pickles has still not apologised to Teresa Cooper for outrageously suggesting that she “Adjust your medication”

In lieu of an apology he has issued through a spokesperson this feeble explanation, “He was giving her a frank piece of advice in private. It wasn’t meant in any way to offend or insult her.” Even setting aside that this “Private advice” was given at a public wildlife event in Ongar, Essex, what makes Eric Pickles think he should offer medical advice ? He’s not a health care professional afterall.

This isn’t the first time that Eric Pickles has masqueraded as a ‘professional’. As you can read below, for a long time he led people to believe that he was a qualified lawyer…


The Face of Boo!


Shortly after being quizzed by Schopen, Pickles filled in his register entry for the second time in 9 years. He now gave his occupation as “Self employed lawyer” working in “Industrial and Employment law”. He added “no work in Bradford” as if to emphasise there could be no clash of interests between his private and political life.

Indeed, Pickles had insisted to Schopen that he had always publicly stated he was an employment lawyer working mainly in the North West. Records bear this claim out.

When he first stood as a councillor in 1979, Pickles had described himself on his election manifesto as “A Lawyer” only weeks before he filled in the council register claiming to be an employee of the Tory party.

Other public statements over the 9 years he had served as a councillor showed him describing himself as “a lawyer”.

Many journalists had noted that Pickles was a “solicitor”. This is not surprising since the rather vague sounding term “lawyer” is in fact quite specific. A “lawyer” is “someone qualified to practice law” and means either a solicitor or a barrister. Since Pickles had never claimed to be a barrister, journalists naturally took it that Pickles’ reference to being a “lawyer” meant he was a qualified solicitor. It was well known that Pickles had studied to be a solicitor in the early 1970′s.

There was just one small problem with all this – Eric Pickles had failed to qualify as a solicitor. And anyone who describes themselves as such without the necessary qualifications commits a criminal offence!The Solicitors Act 1974, Section 21 reads;
■“Unqualified Person Not To Pretend To Be A Solicitor.
■“Any unqualified person who wilfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he is qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine….
■The Pickles Papers




Share this:

Twitter7
Facebook13



Like this:




7 Comments

Filed under Abuse, News, Politics








7 Responses to Eric Pickles: Doctor ? Lawyer ?


david kingman

September 30, 2013 at 4:02 pm


The Moishe solomons radio show was interesting the other night, he covers so much in the news from the jewish perspective, and accrding to him and his guests the BBC knew all about Jimmy savilles antics, but were mainly concerned with hiding up the fact that he abused many boys as well, this was because they were worried the homosexual agenda would be damaged and saville was protected by AIPAC

Reply



zoompad

September 30, 2013 at 4:17 pm


Please tell Teresa to publish that letter from the Senior Police Officer who discredited Haut de la Garenne and Staffordshire Pindown and libelled the victims of the abuse as liars, or at the very least to tell us who the Senior Police Officer is (I’m pretty sure I already know who he is)
Please don’t censor this comment, or if you do, please can you tell me why you have to censor it?
I’d ask Teresa myself but the crafty devils have told her I’m a liar and a stalker, so I’ve had to block her from my social networking, not because I want to but simply to protect myself from any more false accusations

Reply


gojam

September 30, 2013 at 4:29 pm


I’m not ‘telling’ anyone to do anything and this will be the last comment up about ‘a letter’.

Reply



gw

September 30, 2013 at 4:50 pm


“I’d ask Teresa myself but the crafty devils have told her I’m a liar and a stalker, so I’ve had to block her from my social networking, not because I want to but simply to protect myself from any more false accusations”

Yes I’m sure that is exactly what happened… I’ve read more coherent postings in pub toilets…

Reply


roary

September 30, 2013 at 8:14 pm


Applause







zoompad

September 30, 2013 at 4:19 pm


The homosexual agenda is to butter up the military. Manpower.

Reply



Principle5000

September 30, 2013 at 5:50 pm


Appalling State of Affairs

Reply



Leave a Reply


Enter your comment here...