Nominating someone for an honour The honours system recognises people of outstanding merit, and those who have committed themselves to service to the nation. It's been around for centuries, but it was a closed system for many years. Only since 1993 has everybody been free to nominate.
Who can be nominated?
Anyone can be nominated, but only exceptional people are honoured. If you want to see your candidate on the honours list, make sure your nomination has what it takes to make it all the way to Buckingham Palace. Achievement comes in many forms but honours committees are looking for someone who has made a difference in their field of work or community.
Honours can be awarded for all sorts of work - paid or unpaid - but your nominee must still be involved in the activity for which they are nominated.
Before you make your nomination, ask yourself the following questions. Has your nominee:
•made a difference to their community or field of work?
•brought distinction to British life and enhanced its reputation?
•exemplified the best sustained and selfless voluntary service?
•demonstrated innovation and entrepreneurship?
•carried the respect of their peers?
•changed things, with an emphasis on achievement?
•improved the lot of those less able to help themselves?
•displayed moral courage and vision in making and delivering tough choices?
(FROM THE DIRECTGOV SITE)
Child abuse scandalIn February 2008, Walker attracted considerable criticism due to his response to the ongoing investigation of child abuse centred on the former Haut de la Garenne care home. Walker's official position on the matter was that his Council of Ministers would ensure that there was no cover-up and anyone who had been guilty of child abuse in that investigation would be brought to justice.
Following an interview on BBC Radio Jersey, where Stuart Syvret had put forward the view that there had been a systemic failure within Jersey's child protection systems over decades, Walker was filmed retorting that Syvret was out to "shaft Jersey internationally". He was confronted with this footage by Jeremy Paxman on the BBC's Newsnight on 25 February 2008.[24] In the short-term, continuing media reporting of the phrase was damaging to his reputation internationally and locally.[25] However, on 26 February 2009, the BBC Trust, the BBC's own Editorial Watchdog, upheld a complaint from a member of the public and released a report criticising the Newsnight programme for significant failings in the conduct of this interview, stating that the interview had not upheld the BBC's guidelines on fairness and impartiality, that Senator Walker had been misquoted, that the reported exchange between Senator Walker and Syvret had been edited in a way as to misrepresent what Senator Walker had said and so as to mislead the audience and that the correction had not gone far enough in remedying the unfair implications that the quotes had suggested. Frank Walker stated that he was very happy with the outcome, and that he felt vindicated for what he felt was the low-point of his political career.[26][27]
(FROM WIKI FRANK WALKER)
HAS ANYONE ELSE NOTICED HOW JEREMY PAXMAN'S NEWSNIGHT CONTRIBUTIONS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN PARED DOWN SINCE HE WAS REPREMANDED OVER THE FRANK WALKER STUART SYVRET NEWSNIGHT APPEARANCE?
WHO NOMINATED WALKER FOR AN OBE, AND WHY?
11 comments:
Who nominated Frank Walker for an OBE?
Barbara Richards made this Freedom of Information request to Cabinet Office
Currently waiting for a response from Cabinet Office, they must respond promptly and normally no later than 2 February 2011 (details).
Barbara Richards
5 January 2011
Dear Cabinet Office,
I would like to know who nominated Frank Walker for an OBE in the
2011 New Years Honours.
Yours faithfully,
Barbara Richards
Who nominated Frank Walker and why?
Let's start a guess list
Mario Lundy
Danny Wherry
Renne le Suere
Just these three alone have been protected at al cost, all upstanding members of our community and eternally grateful to Frank Walker and the cover-up merchants
How do we get to know for sure who nominated the Bat.
It is the 5th January today, they have to respond to FOI requests by law within 20 working days. So by the end on January we should know who nominated Frank Walker for an OBE.
Nice one Zoompad, makes a mockery of the so called honours list, honours farce more like it.
Can these 'honours' be repealed?
I don't suppose anyone who is dedicated to exposing heinous political corruption would be given a award by the queen even if they where nominated.
Lets test this out the next time these awards are up for grabs by nominating Stuart Syvret or others like him who have put themselves at great risk of harm and loss and whose bravery is exemplary.
I doubt the queen even has a say in who gets these awards and just rubber stamps whatever is put before her.
The Queen is not in any way to blame for child abuse/murder covering up creeps like Walker getting an OBE. Her ministers are though, if they are deliberatly allowing disgraceful nominations like Walkers to get through, it is treason.
Thats a great idea to nominate Stuart. We ought to start doing that right now!
Yes, I think honours can be taken away.
I'd like to see a "Revoke Frank Walker's OBE" campaign begun on Facebook.
You can put me at the front of the queue to sign up if that happens.
Another good idea!
So who did nominate 'Frank the jerk'? I suspect it may have been one (or some) of his cronies who fought to prevent the farcical incomplete behind closed doors investigation? Many believe (including us) that government officials and other authoritative figures used 'protecting Jersey’s reputation' as an excuse to prevent exposure. How many of the obstructive officials played an active part in horrific child abuse, and how many of those still remain in a privileged position?
I never did find out,they wouldn't tell me. Totally disgraceful, it's like a self back patting merry go round for the world's worst people.
Post a Comment