Graham Wilmer of the Lantern Project, has an MBE, here is a photograph of him being awarded it from Prince Charles. I do not know what the MBE has been awarded for.
Graham Wilmer is, as far as I am aware, the only CSA victim who is to be allowed to speak at the Government investigation into institutional child abuse.
I want to point out two things here. The first is that the Lantern Project is for male child abuse survivors, so where is our female CSA victims representation?
The second point is that Graham Wilmer cannot possibly be expected to be the sole representative of all of us CSA victims, that would be too big a burden to place on one lone CSA victims shoulders, surely anyone with any sense can see that?
There are other points that I would like to make, but I think I will leave other people to make those, or draw their own conclusions from this sordid mess that is supposed to be an investigation into CSA but is turning into the most farcicle cover up that its a wonder John Cleese isn't making a new series about it!
26 comments:
NO WONDER THEY'RE ALL CLAMOURING FOR MICHAEL MANSFIELD TO TAKE OVER THE CSA INVESTIGATION JUST LOOK AT THIS!
Barrymore pool man 'attacked before he died'
by REBECCA ENGLISH, Daily Mail
A man found floating in Michael Barrymore's swimming pool was the victim of a serious sexual assault shortly before his death, an inquest heard yesterday.
Stuart Lubbock sustained appalling internal injuries during a drug-fuelled party at the entertainer's house.
The 31-year-old would have been in 'excruciating pain' after the incident.
A pathologist suggested Mr Lubbock - who was three times over the legal drinkdrive limit and had taken drugs including Ecstasy and cocaine - may have been forcibly held down while the alleged assault took place.
Professor Jack Crane claimed that the shock could have caused him to suffer heart failure and die.
Until now it had been widely believed Mr Lubbock, a factory supervisor, had drowned.
Prof Crane said: 'We have the death of a young man which, in my view, is not clear-cut.
'The injuries this young man suffered were very severe and I do not believe they were the result of a consensual sexual act - that is why, in my report, I have said they were the result of a serious sexual assault.
'I do not rule out the possibility of asphyxiation or cardiac arrest occurring during some sort of non-consensual sexual act. Why would a fit, healthy young man drown in a swimming pool? There must be other factors involved.'
The hearing at Epping Coroners' Court has heard how Mr Lubbock, a divorcee with two young children, had met Mr Barrymore at the Millennium nightclub in Harlow, Essex, on March 30 last year.
At 2.35am a group including Mr Lubbock went to the openly-gay TV presenter's sprawling bungalow in nearby Roydon to continue drinking. Drugs were also taken.
Several of the revellers stripped off and got into Mr Barrymore's Jacuzzi.
One woman, Kylie Merritt, claimed Mr Lubbock got out and jumped into the nearby pool, despite his inebriated state, laughing and joking.
A few hours later he was found floating in the water. All efforts to revive him failed.
The court heard yesterday from pathologist Dr Michael Heath, who examined Mr Lubbock's body later that morning.
He revealed that during the course of his post-mortem he discovered 'extensive ( internal) bruising, lacerations and inflammation'. He could not pinpoint an exact time they had been caused but said it would have been within four hours of his death.
Asked by the Lubbock family's barrister Matthew Gowen whether the injuries were 'indicative of a serious sexual assault', Dr Heath replied 'yes'.
Dr Heath said he had examined video footage of Mr Lubbock leaving the nightclub with Mr Barrymore, when, in his opinion, he had appeared in the best of health.
'He did not appear to be suffering any discomfort. If you had suffered these kind of ... injuries then it would have been excruciatingly painful. You would have trouble walking,' he said.
When asked by Mr Barrymore's counsel, Michael Mansfield QC, whether the injuries could have been caused during attempts to resuscitate Mr Lubbock, Dr Heath replied: 'No. Absolutely not.'
Dr Heath insisted that in his opinion Mr Lubbock would have been alive when he entered the pool and died as a result of drowning.
'He had high levels of alcohol and cocaine in his system,' he said. 'These could have been the initial triggers for him to inhale water and not be able to clear it.'
The court also heard evidence from Dr Christopher Milroy, Professor of Pathology at the University of Sheffield, who carried out a second post-mortem on Mr Lubbock.
He found several small haemorrhages - minute broken blood vessels - across the victim's face which, he said, could indicate he had been squeezed around the neck at some stage.
Dr Milroy said he could not rule out that these may have been caused during a sexual game known as 'erotic asphyxiation'.
But, he added, he found this hard to believe given the extent of Mr Lubbock's internal injuries.
Professor Milroy told the hearing he had been unable to conclude exactly how Mr Lubbock died and admitted that drowning was a likelihood, but added: 'It cannot be entirely excluded that he was dead before he went in the water.'
He was followed to the stand by Prof Crane, an independent pathologist who did not carry out his own post-mortem but studied all the previous findings and photographs.
He also found evidence of broken blood vessels across Mr Lubbock's face.
'The problem that I had is that all the typical signs of drowning were not present,' he said. 'I have to say that the cause of death is not drowning but unascertained.'
Although a report on Mr Lubbock's death was sent by Essex Police to the Crown Prosecution Service, detectives were advised there was insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone.
During the course of their inquiry 50-year-old Mr Barrymore was arrested and cautioned for drugs offences. His ex-partner, Jon Kenney, and dustman Justin Merritt were arrested on suspicion of Mr Lubbock's murder but later released without charge.
Mr Barrymore is due to give evidence to the court tomorrow under his real name Michael Parker.
The hearing continues.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-137770/Barrymore-pool-man-attacked-died.html#ixzz3D0gX5jHs
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
MICHAEL MANSFIELD QC WAS MICHAEL BARRYMORE'S DEFENCE!!!
NO WONDER MANSFIELD WASN'T INTERESTED IN THE PINDOWN AND SECRET COURT ABUSE AND COVER UPS!
AND I KNOW NOW THAT EDWINA CURRIE TWITTER ACCOUNT IS FAKE!!!
I have just contacted Graham Wilmer via Twitter and I want to make it very clear that I am not criticising Graham in any way.
I have told him how we were inflitrated by paedophiles and paedophile cover uppers on Mothers for Justice, and how I was blocked from the lantern Project, and I've also asked him if he was aware of Michael Mansfield QC being Michael Barrymores defence lawyer for the rape/swimming pool murder case
I didnt realise he was until today, and am shocked because surely Simon Danczuk and all the others must have known? All I knew up until today is how Michael Mansfield turned my appeal to him to help us CSA victims down in 2009
Thanks for that, yes I know because I was raped via the backside, they do it so the girls wont get pregnant, I don't think some of the paedophiles care if its a girl or a boy
this is nothing new, days after it happened those at the party were saying lubbock was drugged raped and thrown in the pool to drown
here at the BBC it was widely spoken about exacthegooesnatly as the report here says
The same ones covering up for Michael Barrymore are also trying to wreck the child abuse investigations
may i just say the Barrymore enquiry said that he was openly gay
We dont use zionist words in the UK
he was openly homosexual
Similarly we do not say he was a boy-nobber, we say he was a child abuser.
dont forget he was sodomising these young lads at bramley house
Your post is not accurate. The Lantern Project supports male and female survivors as well as working with teenagers, of all sexes. In fact, over 50% of service users are female. Your blog post is a mistruth.
First of all, who are you, anonymous? Because it would be a nice thing if I actually could be allowed to know who I'm talking to.
The Lantern Project hasn't supported or helped me in any way at all. You say 50% of service users are women, I have no way of checking your 50% statistic do I, so I dont know why you've even bothered to tell me that, unless you're intending to back it up with some proof!
This is what I think has happened. I think Graham Wilmer is a genuine child abuse victim, he was abused and fought like bloody hell - as all CSA victims have to, and the same arseholes who flocked to Mothers for Justice and Mumsnet - the paedophile cover uppers, Hemming and his gangsters, took over the admin of his Lantern Project so that they could smash up everything Graham Wilmer was trying to do, and make damned sure victims of institutional CSA are kept as far apart as possible, as effectivly as if we had all been put into solitary confinement in prison.
Talking about prisons, isn't it odd that not a single person from the Lantern Project so far has contacted me over what was happening at Drake Hall prison regarding young disabled children?
As for Graham Wilmers MBE - who actually nominated him for that, name and second please? All I've been fobbed off with so far is that other CSA victims supported him getting an MBE, I wasnt asking who SUPPORTED it I asked for the actual person who NOMINATED him - there is always a name and a seconder, well who were they then please?
I am going to stress, I am NOT attacking Graham Wilmer in any way, just trying to get to the truth, because from where I'm looking it seems he's been treated the same way as other brave and gutsy people who have tried to fight for justice, only to be hemmed in by paedophile gangsters, befriended by the same scum who abused us all in the first place!
Barabara - please call me tomorrow at the project. 0151 630 6956
Hi Barbara. Please contact me on Monday at the project. 0151 630 6956. I would like to talk about your concerns and how you would like to contribute to the inquiry.
I'm not publishing your comment until after I've done it, I have my reasons and will tell you, but I will, but probably not today, as I have to go back to the doctors after what happened on Friday, and I can't deal with anything else today really, because what happened on Friday has left me shattered as per usual.
Sorry to be so mysterious but I don't want the paedotrolls to jump in, I'll explain to you properly after I've been to see my GP
I want Dr Judith Reisman to head the investigation, she's the only one I trust right now, or at least Judith Reisman to be involved in some way, as she is an expert on the Kinsey Institute and organised CSA
I'm going to the doctors this afternoon then as soon as I can I will do what you asked me to, sorry to have to be so secretive but the paedos are so crafty you have to keep ten steps ahead of them all the time, its horrible what they are doing its because they have all the resources of MI5 and all the technology to use to do bad things to the people they are persecuting. One day it will all come out everything that they have done and everything we have had to endure it will be a sad day and a happy day both at the same time, happy for us who will be free of our persecuters for ever, and sad for them because they will have eternal damnation, for refusing to repent and stop the evil they are doing to us
I have to go to the doctors because I want Social Services to help me because I am falling to bits and its humiliating and embarressing and it isn't my fault.
The Emotional Well Being lady is trying to help me, she's trying to, I didnt trust her for ages and then I did and then I stopped trusting her and now I do again, but I live in such a state of terror, I know its because I have Asperger Syndrome and PTSD but that isn't my fault and all the horrible things that the secret family court gangsters did to me, Lisa Haughton, Murray Cantlay, Inderjit Thind Hemming and all the others, they terrorised me and I feel pannicky and terrified a lot of the time.
I phoned Graham Wilmer on Friday afternoon at about 3.45 and I must say, it was a very interesting and enlightening telephone conversation that I had!
I DON'T TRUST ANYONE WHO IS INVOLVED IN FOSTERING OR ADOPTION WHO IS AWARE - AS GRAHAM IS - OF THE COLIN TUCKER FISACO WHO ISN'T RAISING MERRY HELL OVER THE ISSUE!!!
I HAD NO IDEA UNTIL I MADE THAT PHONE CALL THAT GRAHAM WILMER WAS FOSTERING CHILDREN. IF I'D SPOKEN TO GRAHAM I WOULDN'T HAVE FOUND THAT ONE OUT, BUT HE WASN'T IN AT 3.45 ON FRIDAY!!!
Spelling my name wrong, they mock me, so arrogant and certain sure they'll never be found out, mock mock mock.
THE LORD JESUS HAS OTHER IDEAS, THE WICKED WILL ALL BE FOUND OUT!
Putting yet more children at risk you are by saying such things.
I don't understand why Graham Wilmers google profile is blank. If you click on his name the blue link it comes up anonymous. Why would he do that?
Graham Wilmers profile comes up as Profile Not Available.
If theres anyone reading this blog who isn't a paedostalker please could you help me out and explain why Graham Wilmers profile isnt available?
I know MI5 and police read this blog, surely all of you can't be paedophile cover uppers?
Have some of you been told by you bosses that its in the national interest to read this blog and not leave any comments?
Please, if theres anyone in that position reading this, please question what you are being asked to do, at least just ask yourself if its right to do that, and wether it really is in the national interest to be doing it, please use your own brain!
The paedophiles and human traffickers have got away with it because what they do is infiltrate victims groups and take them over, and they then have all the information about all the victims so they can isolate them, its so cruel what they do, its like house arrest, its even worse than that, and they spend vast amounts of public money on surveillance of victims of crime, so they can keep the truth from coming out.
Why would it ever be in the National Interest to cover up for such psychopaths?
The BBC wouldn't let me go on that program about Pindown, CARE HOME KID but they didnt want to be accused of ignoring Pindown, so what they did was make a program about it to brainwash the public into thinking it wasn't too bad in Pindown, and they made damned sure none of the abused victims were allowed to go on the program! Yet that same BBC is now going to pay convicted and utterly unrepentant and shameless Jonathon King to go on a documentary about Genesis.
Its NOT in the National Interest to keep these things quiet, as it ought to be obvious to everyone that the men doing these things are dangerous psychopaths!
I have Asperger Syndrome and PTSD and on bad days I sometimes scream in the street, and I know some people are frightened of me because of that, but I am NOT a danger to anyone and I am NOT a psychopath.
So it ought to be obvious where the national interest really lies, and covering up for the psychopaths who think its ok to spend vast amounts of public money stalking a CSA victim with Asperger Syndrome is NOT a good use of public money and it isn't in the National Interests either!
Post a Comment