Wednesday, 25 June 2014

An olive branch, healing, hacking, Teresa May and WHO IS ANDY?

Perhaps Teresa May really genuinly doesn't realise what MIpaedo have done to institutional abuse victims? Just because David Cameron has deliberatly covered up institutional child abuse and deliberatly alowed members of MI5 to cruelly persecute the victims doesn't mean she is aware of what is happening. I will have to write to her, and tell her what has been going on, in my own handwriting of course, so that no-one else will be able to write a letter pretending to be me - my handwriting has never been very tidy so its a damned sight harder to forge than if I just type a letter, I'm saying this because I'm well aware of who is reading this blog, and so you needn't get any ideas about pulling that one!

Andy Coulson is a hacker and he worked for David Cameron who has deliberatly covered up instititutional abuse, including Pindown and secret court legal abuse, of which I am a victim and have been complaining about for years on end. That HDLG Murder Farce blog was run by "ANDY" and "GAZZA", and those two drove me half mad with the vile things they said and did, and I was being fed anonymous tips on who they were, which I believed at first, being naive at how evil and cowardly people hide behind anonymousity to blog lies. But I did pick up several facts about the mysterious "Andy", and although he boasted "You'll never guess who I am", and the Lord won't tell me (WHY DID YOU LET THOSE DEMONS ABUSE ME JESUS, WHY WHY WHY?)I am not ruling out the possibility of the mysterious "Andy" actually being Andrew Coulson.

The dissapointment of the email recieved from a certain NHS complaints enabling quango yesterday Iam still smarting from, but after a good nights sleep (my sleep takes a long time to come due to PTSD, but when it does come it is sweet and unbroken by a troubled concience, and I do not have to drug myself with large quantities of alcohol in order to dull my concience to enable me to rest, which is what some people with guilty conciences troubling their hell bound souls have to do every night. you know who you are) I have decided to give the people involved a few days grace in which to come up with a plan to actually help me rather than naming and shaming them, because they are recieving large quantities of money to help people like me, that money is for helping people, not covering up the wickedness and persecuting the victims even more, and they all know what I want now, I've not asked anyone for the moon on a piece of string, I just want the same rights as anyone else, to be allowed to divorce a man who molested me who I haven't seen for almost 20 years which Stafford Crown Court, who have had access to all my medical and social work records has deliberatly blocked, to recieve proper and appropriate NHS treatment instead of being fobbed off with dangerous anti psychotic drugs with 29 side effects and bustled off as if I were a damned nuicence even for breathing, to not be treated worse than a criminal by the police for reporting serious crime and death threats made to me, to have access to the welfare benefits advice system which is the biggest tangle for anyone to understand, yet some people, ie Abu Hamza seem to be able to play like a violin and have all sorts of people running round them making dure their human rights are not violated, and others who have not done any wilful harm to anyone else and who have themselves been seriously smashed up have the IT partners of the BBC from Birmingham and Stoke On Trent hounding them and illegally having little conferences to discuss their records and plotting against them and making the whole family so stressed out that one ends up with her hair dropping out and another ends up in such a distressed pannicking state in the street that all the neighbours are gathered round her the police and ambulance gets called and she ends up being whisked into hospital because they think she's had a stroke or something. (IF THAT EVER HAPPENS TO ME AGAIN GOD HELP ME THAT IT NEVER DOES AS ITS ABSOLUTLY TERRIBLE TO BE IN THAT STATE, BUT IF EVER IT DOES IT WILL BE RECORDED AND IT WILL GO ON YOUTUBE FOR ALL TO SEE)

Now I am giving those involved a few days of grace to get their act together. I can't take on the whole world, I can't put the whole world to rights, much as I'd like to, I am one human being, but I'm not a martyr, I don't want to be a martyr, I want my life, I want a few peaceful years of life, selfish that may be but as I've already had enough strife in my life more than most people I would actually like some golden times, with my family, and I would like to marry the man I love, whom I have been prevented from marrying by the blocking of my divorce to the abuser I married 20 years ago, who Stafford Court have prevented me from divorcing. I am holding out an olive branch here, and you can either take it and get your act together on putting things right for me and my family, or you can carry on with the stupid charade and swee where that gets you, the ball is in your court now, so think about it.


Zoompad said...

They are talking about Rebekah Brooks, and theres a conference at number 10 and number 11, I am keeping an open mind about Rebekah Brooks, her being a friend on Facebook to John Whittingdale doesn't mean she was a coverer up of institutional child abuse as well, as the paedophiles and human traffickers do stalk their victims plus anyone who shows any signs of wanting to investigate institutional child abuse.

Zoompad said...

by gojam | March 5, 2013 · 5:15 pm

Dr Morris Fraser And The Azimuth Trust

In 1988 Dr Morris Fraser and Michael Johnson set up a sailing charity for disadvantaged boys called the Azimuth Trust based in Cornwall. They were allowed to do this despite the fact that Dr Fraser, a child psychiatrist had a criminal record for taking indecent photographs of children and assault in 1972 and that Michael Johnson had only the year before in 1987 received a written warning from his employer,Cornwall County Council, after a council disciplinary hearing cleared him of sexual allegations against a boy.

In the 3 years that the Azimuth Trust existed over 100 children took part in sailing trips many of those selected by Dr Morris Fraser had learning difficulties.

The Azimuth Trust published it’s own magazine which included photographs of naked boys. Many known paedophiles subscribed to the magazine.
Dr Morris Fraser contributed a sympathetic chapter to ‘Perspectives on Paedophilia’ published in 1981, as did Peter Righton. Dr Morris Fraser also introduced at least one young boy whom he met through the Azimuth Trust to Charles Napier.
Dr Morris Fraser also introduced one young boy he met through the Azimuth Trust to a ‘photographer’ and a ‘sculptor’ during a visit to the countryside. That day they took many photographs. The boy’s diary reads (spelling corrected) “Sunday, I met a sculptor and a photographer and they took 75 pictures of me nude and said I was a good figure and gave me £5″

Zoompad said...

In the Feb 1994 Michael Johnson, was jailed for four years on six specimen counts of indecent assault against two boys aged nine and 11. At his trial in February, Truro Crown Court was told that Johnson assaulted the boys 50 times between June 1989 and November 1991.

Dr Morris Fraser was never even charged of any crime in connection with his role in the Azimuth Trust, though he was convicted for possession of child pornography 1993.

Source 1 – The Independent

Source 2 – Inside Story
43 responses to “Dr Morris Fraser And The Azimuth Trust”


March 5, 2013 at 5:23 pm




March 5, 2013 at 5:28 pm

and you wnat even more sicker????..

The Child’s Perspective of Pedophilia
Listening to children, or former children, about their experiences or desires of sexual activity with adults ..

Thi site needs to be close down….s



March 5, 2013 at 5:35 pm

it will be legal in this country if we do not do something about it
it is not ok for adults to have sex with kids end of
but where to start when faced with such opposition
just look at children’s minister mageret hodge, after covering up the islington care home crisis she gets promoted to children’s minister form that we must come to the conclusion that to get a top job you must be willing to protect the reputation the party at all costs and if you do you will be rewarded



March 5, 2013 at 5:39 pm

@ANDY I was surprise i found this fact i can easliy name quite a few that are international they even have twiter links and what have twitter done about it? NOTHING..

Pingback: Alternative News Network – Dr Morris Fraser And The Azimuth Trust


March 5, 2013 at 5:42 pm

the perspectives book is even on sale on amazon !!!



March 5, 2013 at 5:43 pm

google books and there are more..


Zoompad said...


March 5, 2013 at 5:46 pm





March 5, 2013 at 5:53 pm

@admin is there anything that can be done to stop this stuff i mean amazon and google? what the matter with them????



March 5, 2013 at 6:04 pm

I think the books have their historical place. You read them now and their poor justifications for paedophilia are a joke.

I’ve read some of the chapters of Tom O’Carrol’s book, which is online, and although it’s not pleasant reading somebody who obviously has no remorse, it did give me insights into how PIE operated.



March 5, 2013 at 6:08 pm

@gojam and andy all the same this is out of order surely google amnd amazon or providers should have that stuff blocked…??

i know about a chain on them for a while now they all have twitter links too but i dont knoiw what to do i dare not name them in public but something has to be done..


March 5, 2013 at 6:02 pm

was just gonna link the tom carrol
had a little read and was disgusted
is this not something that ceop should be looking into??



March 5, 2013 at 6:11 pm

Absolutely Disgusting and Diabolical



March 5, 2013 at 6:18 pm

this is that IPCE stuff..



March 5, 2013 at 6:25 pm

after a few lines it says how the german group are using homosexual fronts for pedo rings
i can’t read the rest it really turns my stomach



March 5, 2013 at 6:26 pm

so then mr camooron


March 5, 2013 at 6:27 pm

@andy ok i wasnt sure but the name comes up with o carroll so thats why this site caught my eye..nasty grubby things..yeauch!!


March 5, 2013 at 6:21 pm

I don’t know why I am shocked at such depravity after the things I have read in recent months, but I am.
Only just found time to watch the Op Orchid Lost Boys you posted previously. The attitude of the CPS was mind boggling and extremely disturbing.
Trying to get things straight in my mind, was it the Op Orchid investigation that had picked up VIPs visiting “parties” at a garage or is that something altogether separate ?


Zoompad said...


March 5, 2013 at 7:16 pm

Where did Azimuth Trust ‘select’ the boys from? Do we know?



March 5, 2013 at 7:40 pm

I don’t know. He was a child psychiatrist so he had access to vulnerable children..


john carey

March 5, 2013 at 7:22 pm

Operation Orchid happened when we had I believe, a Home Secretary who was up to his neck in child abuse – what chance have the Police and the CPS regarding prosecutions if the `boss` things its a misdemeanour?



March 5, 2013 at 7:27 pm

@john carey they are all in it together..


john carey

March 5, 2013 at 7:37 pm

I disagree – but it takes a brave man to say these things are wrong – Private Mannings comes to mind


March 5, 2013 at 7:38 pm

@john caret but that thing aboiut power corrupting and all that


March 5, 2013 at 7:44 pm

Hi John I managed to find the reference I was looking for on the spotlight site another massive stinking cover up.


john carey

March 5, 2013 at 8:13 pm

Its not really a massive cover up – as stated previously the first thing they ask a young convicted prisoner on entering prison is, `have you been in care?`

Nobody could give a flyinf f… about damaged young people – they either kill themselves (eventually through drink and drugs) or end up in prison

No self worth -no `winners` really from care homes or institutions – or am I wrong?

Zoompad said...


March 5, 2013 at 8:31 pm

Listen guys you are so hung up about things, loosen up a little. Once buggery was beyond contempt, it was illegal and punishable with a jail sentence, ask Oscar Wilde – now all the best people indulge in same sex penetration (i am told). The liberal intellectual elite have thought deeply about human existence and concluded that as there is no God and therefore no Ten Commandments, all human desire should be satisfied. If this means sex with children (perhaps even fetuses), and it enriches human experience; who are we to say it is wrong.
I think that PIE presented their arguments in favour of sex with four year olds with similar reasoning. Anything but anything can be argued for, and with an able advocate, any proposition can be won.
Beware the intellectual, beware those who have lived in cloisters, whether of the advanced learning kind or the religious kind.


john carey

March 5, 2013 at 8:44 pm

David so what you are saying that if you were a child again you would be happy to be abused? – if you are a parent now no problem with young David/Davina being abused, because`all the best people indulge`, is that what you are saying?



March 5, 2013 at 8:50 pm


David is not making the case for child abuse just demonstrating how the sophists argue.


March 5, 2013 at 8:56 pm

John, Of course not see gojam’s post.


March 5, 2013 at 8:52 pm

There is something beyond obscene about our world; at the heart of our world there is intrinsic corruption. Blogs like this one, and Spotlight, and others, are highlighting a particular vile corruption – historic child sex abuse on an unimaginable scale. The deeply disturbing thing is that this abuse is systemic, and part and parcel of this nation. Many institutions and many “fine” people have been alluded to; pray tell me, how does one end something through the system when those within the system have historically allowed these vile things to happen?



March 5, 2013 at 11:14 pm

Revolution. Destroy the system and those who rule it.



March 5, 2013 at 10:49 pm

Margret Hodge MP, currently winning plaudits on a Parliamentary Committee – its name escapes me (I wonder why); once was the leader of a Greater London Council were child sex abuse was endemic. Miss Hodge rode the troubles there (don’t they all) to become a member of Parliament, and subsequently MINIISTER FOR CHILDREN. Demetrious Panton, who had been sexually abused in care under Margarert Hodge protested (how dare he!) . The noble lady (as surely she will in time become) suggested that Demtriious Panton was insane (ok, “unbalanced”).
Our Demmy, However, was made of sterner stuff, he legally challenged Maggie; Miss Hodge withdrew and paid a suitable amount of money to the noble Demetrious Panton, which went to charity.
So, Pray tell me, how does one challenge this evil system?



March 6, 2013 at 12:16 am

do you know her real name and family history
fascinating read



March 6, 2013 at 8:03 am

Hi andy, I know only the basics – Jewish, rich, born “Oppenheimer”. For some reason I am not fascinated enough about the woman to delve any further.

Zoompad said...


March 6, 2013 at 4:15 pm

Interesting tactic on this one David. So the establishment raping children (mostly poor/vulnerable) is the status quo and it can’t be changed? Really?

In your time attacking the abused has there been a time where the wheels on the Paedo bus have started to rattle? Would you deny that a lot more noise is now being made? Will the secret services start to pick off every blogger/twitterer?

With more people becoming aware and with the right strategy the British Paedolph ilses will be cleansed of state sponsored/sanctioned child rape.



March 6, 2013 at 10:26 pm

DEAR ALL, in a documentary about the cooke was said that ian gabb obtained confessions from sidney cooke and his gang whilst in this is my question was there anything in that information obtained about connections with VIPs and if so what happened to that information??

Clarence J Boddicker

March 6, 2013 at 9:57 am

Bloody hell… That top photograph… It’s Jezza Clarkson!



March 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm

Bob that information only led to the prosecution of Leslie Bailey , Cooke and Oliver did not stand trial, I think you’re right they may have named VIPs and others but it was all conveniently hushed up. Bailey had learning difficulties so he was no threat.
The surveillance mentioned in the documentary also picked up VIPs see above link


Pingback: Operation Greenlight Only Scratches The Surface. | theneedleblog

Pingback: BBC presenter was linked to the Paedophile Information Exchange | spotlight


April 17, 2013 at 12:18 pm

What happened to Michael Johnson after he’s three years in prison? Is he still a skipper on training ships somewhere in the world, like in his native country America.



April 18, 2013 at 7:49 am

My son goes to Special School and he went on the Tall Ships Experience with the school. At first I wasn’t going to let him go, because I was terrified of this sort of thing, but I was reassured when I found out certain members of staff from the school who I trust would be going. My son had a wonderful time, but he nearly missed out. Its so horrible that paedophiles home in on children with special needs, how low can you get? They ought to get life sentences, and I mean life.


Your comment is awaiting moderation.

June 25, 2014 at 9:25 am

My son was also taken to Drake Hall prison from the special school he was attending, for PE lessons, along with his classmates, WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT AND WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF OTHER PARENTS.
I have been trying to find out the name of this scheme, because it wasn’t just happening at one prison, this arrangement was happening at other schools for disabled youngsters as well, and other prisons, Standford Hill prison being one of them.

All the time my son was attending school I was living in terror, anyone who is aware of what happened to me will understand what I am talking about, I’m one of the Staffordshire Pindown child abuse victims, and have suffered years of reabuse.

My son is not at Special School any more, thank God, as it is terrifying being a parent in this day and age, there were some good kind people at that school, who really wanted to do their very best for the children who attended there, unfortunatly there were also people there who were allowing people into the school to have access to our children who never ought to have been let anywhere near our children.


Zoompad said...


Zoompad said...


5 June 2013 - 4:11pm | posted by Steven Raeburn | 15 comments

Prime Minister’s barrister brother heads legal chambers representing Rebekah Brooks in phone hacking defence


Alexander Cameron QC heads Three Raymond Buildings chambers

As Rebekah Brooks pleads not guilty to charges of phone hacking, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and unlawful payment to officials, Prime Minister David Cameron's high flying barrister brother, head of the legal chambers she is using, told The Drum his role did not present him with any conflict of interest.

He said that all the barristers working in the Chambers of which he is head were self-employed and had separate practices.

The Chambers UK legal directory entry for Three Raymond Buildings, the barristers Chambers for which Mr Cameron QC is described as head, states: “Advice and representation has also been provided in respect of charges levelled against Rebekah Brooks and Charles Brooks.”

When approached by The Drum asking whether he had represented Mrs Brooks, Alexander Cameron QC responded by simply stating: “You are misinformed.”

The Drum asked Mr Cameron QC if he acted in an informal capacity in this case, rather than by way of formal instruction, and given the nature of his family connection to Mr and Mrs Brooks, whether there was any conflict of interest.

Mr Cameron QC provided the following explanation:

“Under the current rules in England and Wales individual barristers practise from a set of chambers. A set of chambers is made up of self-employed barristers who share some of the expenses of practice (for example, rent and staff costs). But each of the barristers have separate practices. Barrister A in set of chambers X can be prosecuting a case in which the defendant is defended by barrister B who is in the same set of chambers. There is no corporate entity.

“The Head of Chambers is merely the person chosen by the barristers in his set to be its head.

“The Chambers entry does not say that I acted for or represented Mrs Brooks. It merely describes by example, of which the Brooks case is one, some of the cases in which individual members of chambers have been involved, in that instance, Hugo Keith QC.”

The Bar Council directory lists a total of 358 barristers’ Chambers in London, with 50 chambers in the city specialising in criminal law work.

Zoompad said...

Just had another email from that NHS advocate, saying she's out of office, no doubt a big discussion of how to deal with me is going on.

Well, for what its worth, here's my advice, and it is good advice and well worth taking. Treat me with integrity, as I always try to treat others with integrity. Don't try pulling any more stupid masonic head games over on me, because any more naughty business done to me is just going to come out into the open, so don't be stupid.

No-ones actually tried to do the right thing so far, so why not give that a try instead? You might actually be pleasantly surprised at the results.

There, you can lead a horse to the water but you can't force him to drink, but at least I've spoken my mind.

Zoompad said...

The truth behind the child abuse cover-ups

The report that first exposed child abuse in North Wales care homes has finally been published. But, says Eileen Fairweather, damning details have still been left out

Bryn Estyn, known as 'Colditz'; abused children ran away but were returned

By Eileen Fairweather

7:39PM BST 13 Jul 2013


Seventeen years ago, a nervous-sounding woman rang and asked me to publicise a top-secret report. She was not the whistleblower, she explained, but a go-between. She would not give me her name: “It’s safer if you don’t know.”

That secret report revealed the extensive rape and savage beating of countless children in North Wales children’s homes. It was titled “Child Abuse: An independent investigation commissioned by Clwyd County Council, period 1974-1995”. Last week, John Jillings’s report on the Clwyd scandal was finally published. But Flintshire county council – successor to Clwyd – has heavily censored it. I dug out the original and discovered, unsurprisingly, that the cover-up continues.

The cloak-and-dagger way I obtained the redacted report speaks volumes about how those struggling to expose Britain’s child abuse rings were intimidated and derided. Few then believed children’s allegations that people in power, including politicians and senior police, were involved. I was myself incredulous when first asked in 1990 to investigate a social worker. Weren’t care professionals all kind?

It was a baptism by fire, as one investigation rapidly led to another, and I realised that paedophiles had comprehensively infiltrated Britain’s children’s homes since the 1970s.

Back in 1996, only a handful of local politicians and officials were allowed a copy of Jillings’s report. They were told – by police, insurers and the council – that they risked their careers, arrest and being personally sued if a word reached the media. The uncensored Jillings report includes these chilling threats.

Related Articles

Children still at risk from abuse in institutions, warns report by crime agency
24 Oct 2013

The power of prayer has helped so many
27 Mar 2013

Eileen Fairweather: Justice requires detective work not hearsay
09 Nov 2012

Social services took my children
26 Feb 2011

Terror police investigating nail bomb attack at mosque
12 Jul 2013

Royal baby name sweepstake
11 Jul 2013

Zoompad said...

Every report had a number, imprinted as a large watermark on every page. Any journalist who quoted it would supposedly be ordered by the courts to produce their copy or photocopy or face jail, and the watermark would expose their source.

My caller said apologetically I must write out the report by hand. I was also told to share it widely with other reporters. Journalists need exclusives, but the rationale was sound: “If all the media cover this, there won’t be a witch-hunt.”

I collected the report from a safe 'drop’ point. It took me three exhausting days, holed up alone in a poky room in a B&B, to scribble out hundreds of pages. I fed to different newspapers and broadcasters different extracts suggested by my source. I only produced one article, and later a programme for HTV, under my name.

At least one paper and a news channel independently acquired the report: clearly, others whistle-blew. The coverage was widespread, and the whistleblowers’ drip-feed strategy worked: no one was arrested or sued.

Clamour mounted, and the Government announced a public inquiry. Yet surely, no further inquiries were needed: instead, police could have acted on the evidence already given to them by hundreds of victims and concerned staff, kicked-in doors and arrested suspected perpetrators.

The late judge, Sir Ronald Waterhouse, took evidence over three years, and in 2000 produced a report, “Lost in Care”. His tribunal had cost millions and ultimately achieved little, other than fat fees for lawyers. It amplified the horrors described by Jillings but it did not lead to arrests or managers being disciplined or struck off.

Jillings – the retired former director of Derbyshire social services – and his team, Prof Jane Tunstall and Gerrilyn Smith, had been commissioned after several former workers at Clwyd care homes were prosecuted in the early 1990s for abuse. But victims described many more abusers, and alleged organised child prostitution.

Last autumn Rod Richards – a former Welsh Conservatives leader, who has recently joined UKIP – revealed that the late Sir Peter Morrison MP, a close aide to Mrs Thatcher, was implicated in the North Wales care scandal. Did this limit the political will to act?

Zoompad said...

Flintshire county council says it has redacted much of the Jillings Report on the advice of Operation Pallial, which in April confirmed it is examining 76 new allegations of abuse in 18 North Wales care homes between 1963 and 1992.

North Wales Chief Constable Mark Polin has warned abusers: “If you believe that the passage of time will reduce the resolve of Operation Pallial or any police force to identify people still alive who have caused harm to others and bring them to justice, you are sorely mistaken. Offenders should quite rightly have to look over their shoulders for the rest of their lives.”

Mrs Justice Macur is also examining the evidence excluded from the Waterhouse inquiry. Following a key arrest, I am cautiously hopeful that, this time, police mean business.

The authorities had issued such stern libel threats to Jillings’s panel that it only named a few of the accused staff who were allowed to resign unpunished. But he exposed the excuses of the jobsworths who allowed sadists to control these terrible homes. This is the real censored dynamite in the report.

The whited-out paragraphs in the redacted version help minimise the breathtaking incompetence and laziness of ''the suits’’ – those in the Welsh Office, the Social Services Inspectorate, the local council and welfare directors.

Some cuts are not even indicated. Jillings wrote that one Bryn Estyn boss – allowed to take early retirement following grave concerns – caned children “despite Welsh Office guidance to the contrary”. In the redacted version, at section 8.6.4, the key words “Welsh Office” have vanished.

Zoompad said...

So many looked the other way, despite desperate children and a lone, brave social worker begging for years for action. Shamefully, the whistleblower Alison Taylor’s name is also redacted from the online version of Jillings. This heroine was sacked. But those who looked the other way were promoted, moved to senior child welfare roles elsewhere or retired on enhanced benefits – like many alleged abusers.

Jillings, in the non-redacted report, reveals that one head of a home who allegedly cruelly beat boys even had a post secured for him by Clwyd at an exotic holiday destination abroad. Might some who failed to act now be investigated for neglect or conspiracy? When does inertia become criminal?

Many children ran away, but police returned them, weeping, to their abusers. At Bryn Estyn – famously described by Jillings as “the Colditz of residential care” – one boy was crammed into a laundry basket, the lid tied shut and tossed into a swimming pool. Other children saved him from drowning.

Jillings also describes ''M’’, a 15-year-old girl. Three men were eventually convicted of unlawful sex with her at her foster home. They tied her to a wooden pole, dragged her upstairs and half-drowned her in a cold bath. Yet managers claimed the sex was consensual. The uncensored version exposes concerns that she was prostituted. Such subtle redactions make it harder for people to join the dots.

In May 1997, after the Jillings report, a key member of Clwyd’s fostering panel was imprisoned for abuse. Roger Saint had been appointed despite his known history of abuse.

Other redacted details concern Unit Five, where older boys routinely abused younger ones. It was feared that they violently “broke in” recruits for a paedophile ring. But managers said the sex was consensual.

Zoompad said...

The redacted version also conceals the fact that David John Gillison, imprisoned in 1987 for three years for gross indecency against a boy in care, was prominent in the local Campaign for Homosexual Equality. Why conceal that? Paedophiles in other child-care scandals have similarly hijacked the banner of gay rights – to the detriment of both children and ordinary, decent gay men.

I earlier exposed a similar scandal at Islington children’s homes, where paedophile staff cynically accused anyone raising concerns of “homophobia”.

The redacted version has also removed the fact that a former Bryn Estyn head was arrested for abuse but the charge dropped. Yet Mat Arnold was long dead, so why was this cut? Jillings later – seemingly randomly – mentions that Arnold died of an unspecified blood disease. Later he notes his concern that the abusers put their victims at risk of sexually related diseases. Did he fear that Arnold died of Aids – and is that still too politically incorrect to mention?

I later exposed Mark Trotter, a Hackney social worker who died of Aids after abusing boys in care. His council believed him an Aids martyr and covered up his abuse.

The real martyrs are the care children who killed themselves or died violently. Jillings lists 12. He called them R1, R2, etc, with just a few poignant lines about their deaths by hanging or falling from heights. My hand ached after I wrote out that report, and so did my heart.

I later learnt of four other abused boys who died tragically or mysteriously. I rang the secretariat of the Waterhouse tribunal and asked if it would examine the deaths of these 16 boys. The official said no and, when I asked why not, became supercilious. If they’re dead, he snapped, they can’t give evidence – can they?

I slammed down the phone and wept.

Back in 1996, my sole news story about Jillings’s report appeared in a Sunday paper. It had been severely cut. I understood why – I had focused on something key but “dry”, namely the insurers’ role in suppressing the report. But I felt I had failed these hurt children and my distress infected a weekend with old friends.

Even they seemingly thought I was exaggerating the scale of the scandal. I glumly trailed round a stately home’s garden with them and shut up. One, a psychoanalyst, wrote me a sweet, implicit apology after the Jimmy Savile revelations and said she and colleagues had since been inundated with people painfully disclosing long-hidden abuse. She thanked me for helping make the unbelievable believable.

I have sometimes thought of those who escaped the Holocaust during the war, but no one believed their stories. This has been a hard journalistic beat to tread. Yet I am not one of the victims of Britain’s holocaust of children, just a witness, a reporter. Dear God, please, this time, let us not fail them.

Eileen Fairweather is an award-winning journalist whose investigations over 20 years have helped expose several paedophile rings

Zoompad said...


Zoompad said...

Plenty of people from all over the world, including Jersey are reading my blog, but not many people posting comments.

Thats ok though. I'd still write the blog even if no-one else read it and no-one bothered posting any comments, I'd still write the blog for my own self!

Zoompad said...

Someone anonymously left a ridiculous legalistic threat on my blog, but my automatic spam detector put it into the spam pile, I'm not going to argue with that!

Good advice to the person who left the threat - stop stalking child abuse victims on Twitter and on their blogs, especially Christians, as the Lord doesn't like you doing stuff like that you know!

Zoompad said...

Just seen on the BBC local news a woman called Amanda Beech has been given 56 day jail sentence for publishing a photo of her own child online, the judge was Ross Duggan of Stoke on Trent secret family court

I have just found this:,d.bGE

The Purpose of this Report is to Assess whether Judge Duggan is able to conduct a fair hearing in accordance with Judicial Procedure and Article 6 of the Human Rights Act.

James Ross Duggan was born on the 14th July 1956. He enjoys cricket , football , travel and theatre.

He lives in an expensive house in Lathom, Ormskirk, Lancashire , L40 5UA

His Career: bar Liverpool 1978-2006, circuit judge (Midland Circuit) 2006-, designated family judge 2007-. The Queen has appointed James Ross Duggan as a Circuit Judge. Lord Falconer assigned him to the Midlands Circuit with effect from 10 April 2006.

Lord Falconer is responsible for keeping family courts secret. What do we know about Lord Falconer?

Name Charles Leslie Falconer, Baron Falconer of Thoroton, PC, QC, Britsh barrister and Labour party politician. Falconer became a flatmate of Tony Blair when they were both young barristers in London in the late 1970′s in Wandsworth. Tony Blair is the Prime Minister that invented adoption targets and stated the adoption of children needed to be increased by 50 %. It’s important to state that here for further reference later.

In June 2003 Lord Falconer became the Lord Chancellor and the first secretary of state for constitutional affairs, a position created originally to replace the position of Lord Chancellor.

In May 2007 the department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) became the new Ministry of Justice. With an enhanced portfolio, that encompasses all the responsibilities of the former DCA plus some functions transferred from the Home Office.

Upon that reorganisation taking effect on may 9th 2007, Lord Falconer became the first Secretary of State for Justice, while keeping the title and role of Lord Chancellor.

Zoompad said...

In 2007, Lord Falconer crushed an attempt to open the the proceedings of the family courts to public scrutiny and declared that ‘children’s rights to privacy comes first’.

Following Gordon Brown’s succession to the position of Prime Minister, Falconer was replaced as Minister of Justice.

8th July 2008 Falconer joined the London office of Gibson Dunn and Crutcher. Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher resolved the disputed 2000 presidential election in favour of George Bush. Gibson, Dunn and Cruthcher LLP received the 2006 Corporate Award for special achievement in Adoption from the North American Council on Adoptable Children. The firm was honoured for expediting the adoption process of thousands of children.

Lord Falconer also made the headlines by defending a judge who had given a non custodial sentence to a paedophile.

Lord Falconer seems to be very leniant in his views regarding peadophiles and endorses the work of ‘pro paedophile’ psychologist Richard Gardner in the family courts. There was also an outcry regarding the case of Craig Sweeney.

Zoompad said...

Craig Sweeney (born c. 1982) is a Welsh child sex offender, from Newport in Wales. Public criticism of Sweeney’s sentence voiced by Home Secretary John Reid prompted the House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee to recommend that the Ministerial Code be amended with guidelines to govern the public comments of ministers about individual judges to reinforce the provisions within the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.[1] The Committee wrote: “The Sweeney case was the first big test of whether the new relationship between the Lord Chancellor [i.e. Lord Falconer] and the judiciary was working properly, and it is clear that there was a systemic failure.

Craig Sweeney was found guilty of the abduction and sexual assault of a three year-old girl. He was known to the victim’s family, whom he had befriended weeks before the crime.[4] Sweeney was released on licence in late 2005 after serving a term in jail for indecently assaulting a six-year-old in April 2003. While on licence, he was accused of inappropriately touching a child’s bottom, but the police and probation workers did not return him to prison, despite his “risk of harm” being raised to “high”.[5] Sweeney abducted the girl on 2 January 2006, two days after his licence had expired.[4] He drove her to his Newport flat where he was living on licence. He was caught the day after, when he crashed his car during a high speed chase initiated after Sweeney jumped a red light. The girl, who was in the crash with him, survived with minor injuries.[4]Sweeney admitted four charges of kidnapping, three of sexual assault and one of dangerous driving. His defence counsel said he had “shown remorse when arrested and was distressed at the depravity at what he had done”.

Zoompad said...

He was sentenced to life in prison with a tariff of 18 years, and will be considered for parole after five years and 108 days. The tariff was so because of his co-operation with the police and his guilty plea at the latest opportunity, as well as the time he had spent in custody awaiting trial. On 10 July 2006, it was decided that the case would not be referred to the high court of appeal, as the sentence had been compliant with the law, and he did not want to bow to public pressure. The victim’s mother said she was “Gut-wrenchingly sick” at the decision.

Given what we know about Lord Falconer, should we not be worried who he assigns as Judges, especially when it comes to children’s cases?

Judge James Ross Duggan is also affiliated with a company/charity called Local Solutions, company number 1792921 - charity number 515060

Registered Office: Mount Vernon GreenHall Lane LiverpoolL7 8TF

James Ross Duggan is listed as the Vice Chairman for this company.

Rev Steven BrookesJ Ross Duggan – Vice Chairman

Mumin KhanA T Robert MacfarlaneDavid A Mathieson
Shelagh McGrath, Robert T H Owen, Geoffrey Russell, Neil Scales, Richard M White, Barbara H Wood
Chief Executive: M. PearsonSecretary: M. Pearson

Bankers: National Westminster Bank plc, 22 Castle Street, Liverpool, L69 2BE

Solicitors: Brabners Chaffe Street, 1 Dale Street, Liverpool L2 2ET

Mace & JonesDrury House, 19 Water Street, Liverpool L2 ORP

Auditors: Grant Thornton UK LLP, 1 st Floor, Royal Liver Building, Liverpool L3 1PS



The Objectives of the Company;

Objectives and activities
The objects of the charity are set out in the Memorandum and Articles of Association. The main areas of activityare the promotion of charitable purposes in the fields ofeducation, social welfare and recreation. As we say in our mission statement we seek to improve the quality of life by challenging social and economic disadvantage. This we do by working closely with partners in the public, private and voluntary sectors. Within the public sector our partners include national bodies and local authorities in our operational areas. We seek to be a flexible and innovative organisation.

Despite the disappointing financial outcome, we feel that in many ways the year under review has been one ofprogress for Local Solutions. Our turnover has increased by 7.5% which is well ahead of the rate of inflation. The most significant increases were in the provision of our Domiciliary and Social Care and our Early Years Care services.

Zoompad said...

In Autumn we were approached by Flintshire Social Services about the prospect of replicating the MAP service and setting up a Supported Lodgings Scheme in their area. The Supporting People Team in Denbighshire also contacted us with a view to setting up a similar scheme there. A number of discussions have since taken place to clarify if theseare viable options for us to consider. We have also been approached by Merseyside Connexions with regards to the possibility of us taking over the management of a Young Mother’s Supported Accommodation Unit in South Liverpool. The Unit, which consists offive self-contained flats with 24 hour site support for young mother’s aged 16 and 17 is a much needed resource in the city.

We achieved our aim of building on the connections we already had in place and widening the range of those helpingto fund our activities with the result relationships were strengthened with a range of agencies. These included schools, community/voluntary organisations, probation, social services, drugs rehabilitation projects, homelessness and mental health agencies.

At the beginning of the year we set ourselves various objectives. One of these was to consolidate and expand partnership arrangements for delivery of services. We now feel we have made good progress in this area. There have been new ventures with the Local Authorities, for example in Early Years. We have also made considerable efforts to involve our service users as partners involving them in surveys and consultations in many areas of our work.

Total income increased from £13.56m to £14.57m, a rise of 7.5%. This is slightly ahead of last year’s growth of6.5% and well ahead of the rate of inflation and confirms the ongoing increase in the volume of services we are providing. Whilst there was a decrease in the turnover in Lifelong Learning, there were significant increases in our Early Years and Domiciliary and Social Care activities.

Zoompad said...

We are pleased to be able to report that at the end of the year, the cash at bank and in hand figure was £876k, over£500k higher than a year earlier, though it is important to emphasise that this higher figure still represents only three weeks’ operating expenses.

For the year ended 31 March 2006
Total funds carried forward at31 March 2006 1,191,967

My Conclusion: Judge Duggan is in breach of the six ‘values’ the principles being

1. Judicial independence is a prerequisite to the rule of law and a fundamental guarantee of a fair trial. A judge shall therefore uphold and exemplify judicial independence in both its individual and institutional aspects.

2. Impartiality is essential to the proper discharge of the judicial office. It applies not only to the decision itself but also to the process by which the decision is made.

3. Integrity is essential to the proper discharge of the judicial office.

4. Propriety and the appearance of propriety, are essential to the performance of all of the activities of the judge.

5. Ensuring equality of treatment for all is essential to the due performance of the judicial office.

6. Competence and diligence are prerequisites to the due performance of judicial office.

Zoompad said...

Judge Duggan has been made aware that the Local Authority has misled the court and has ignored it. He has had 3 bundles of my evidence and 7 professional witness statements since 2011 and does not appear to have read them.

He has not allowed experts appointed in the case to have access to them thus only allowing Local Authority bundles to be passed on.

He is allowing comments to be made in respect to previous findings in a case that ended in 2009 that was based on flawed evidence and misdiagnosis, in which the Judge at that time Judge Granville Styler saw evidence of the Local Authority perverting the course of justice and committing contempt of court and did nothing.

He is denying me the right to the witnesses I need to call that would be able to evidence that the social worker and CAFCASS officer’s statement and reports are flawed and untrue.

He has pandered to the solicitor for the child for the hearing to take place on the 2nd July, so they can call their witness Dr John Pilgrim who wrote a report on me without seeing me and whose old reports are out of date see Webster v Norfolk County Council. He has set it out to be a 5 day hearing during which my daughter’s social worker is on holiday and will not be able to be cross examined.

He also has not put my daughter paramount in this case and has put costs and time limits over my daughter which also breaches the child’s welfare check list.

There are many breaches of the data protection act also as information about myself likely to cause me distress has been given out without my consent. There is also yet again issues with social workers perverting the course of justice.

Judge Duggan should be removed from my case with immediate effect for his breach of his ethical standards as set out above, as there are only two judges at Stoke who now deal with care cases, one being the above named and the other being Judge Granville Styler responsible for the miscarriage of Justice in respect to my son Ethan Lloyd and the use of the fraudulent psychiatrist Dr George Hibbert who is now facing a fitness to practice panel hearing as a result of my case and complaint, the only option appears for the case to be transferred to another court and Stafford court would be more convenient for all parties.

Judge Duggan clearly has vested interests outside the courts arena being vice chairperson to a company that is involved in social care and works with Local Authorities. This gives question to how impartial he can be when dealing with Local Authorities and Social Workers in the court room and may signify why he has showed biasedness.

It is my view that Judge Duggan has demonstrated a biasedness toward the Local Authority and the social workers which includes the CAFCASS officer and this will have serious repercussions for the child involved and her family causing immense distress and injustice.

yours faithfully


Zoompad said...

An update - after God knows how long of nagging nagging nagging and nagging for pretty basic practical help, I am now being offered some basic help on how to negotiate the benefits system and other practical problems which are the direct fall out of the abuse I suffered as a child 40 years ago, and the reabuse that was supposed to cover it and me all up, well perhaps this might mean I can at least start to be allowed to rejoin the human race and not be terrified of spending any money on basic day to day expenses. (so much for the Allan Levy QC promise that the Pindown victims will get the best of help, because so far the help I've had to be blunt has been absolute crap)

Well, it will be nice if I am to actually be allowed to heal and be happy after so many years of misery and terror, so I look forward to Tuesday.

Zoompad said...

Oops, I spoke too soon, I should have looked at my email inbox before I wrote the last comment.

Because it looks like the abuse and cover ups are to continue.

Well, if they do, I will not be gagged!

Zoompad said...

I'm not posting that comment, along with the last one you sent me, the legal threat, the latest comment is joining that one in the spam bin. You must think I am really stupid. You are not going to pull a McAlpine on me, so you're wasting your time chum.

Zoompad said...

I haven't forgotten who was involved in the Pindown cover up, I haven't named certain names, but I knew certain people would pop their ugly heads over the parapet if I just bided my time.

Zoompad said...

And the sly persecution of my daughter continues.

And Stafford Police and all the other Pindown/secret (therefore illegal) court abuse cover uppers expect me to sit trembling in a corner and be reduced into a pitiful subdued silent wreck?

You'll wait for the end of time before that will happen, God help me!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Zoompad said...

I've taken that link down, because, I dont know how the hell you did it, but it led to my own Hotmail inbox!

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know whether Dr Marietta Higgs (of the 1980s Cleveland child abuse scandal) still works at Medway Maritime Hospital, Kent as a paediatrician and whether she is involved with child protection?