David Cameron does not want to talk about who he has been entertaining, which is pretty understandable, considering some of the people he has had round for dinner.
Donors' secret No. 10 dinners: How Dave and Sam's meals with millionaires forced Tory treasurer to quitPeter Cruddas offered access to PM in return for cash He suggested donors who agreed to give £250,000 a year would have their ideas 'fed in' to Downing Street Undercover reporters told they could dine with Mr Cameron, George Osborne and senior ministers 'Bigger donors' visited David and wife Samantha's apartment, he claimed Mr Miliband called revelations 'disturbing' Mr Cameron said Cruddas's comments were 'unacceptable'
It's a bit of a home goal for Ed Milliband though, because his apron donning kneebending party brethren are just as bad as the Tory posh boys funny handshakers.
But the apron wearing funny handshaking kneebenders of all colours are pretty unanimous when it comes to covering up institutional child abuse. They worked together to stop the police investigation of Pindown child abuse in 2002. Well done chaps!
"14 The concerns about trawling were shared by a number of those who gave evidence to this enquiry. David Rose, Special Investigative Reporter for the Observer, told us that:
"The problem with trawling as it is now carried out is that it is an absolutly unregulated process which ...is almost tailor made to generate false allegations"
15 We sought views on the scale of the problem. (YOU DIDN'T SEEK ANY VIEWS FROM ANY OF THE PINDOWN CHILD ABUSE HELLHOLE HOME SURVIVORS THOUGH, DID YOU?)David Rose guessed that 50 or so former care workers convicted of sexual abuse had been wrongly convicted. Chris Saltrese, a criminal defence solicitor specialising in these cases, estimated that over 100 had been wrongly convicted (IS THAT INCLUDING ANY OF THE DIRTBAGS WHO WERE LAUGHING AT HOW STUPID THE POLICE WERE AND WHO WERE JUSTIFYING HAVING PICTURES OF NAKED CHILDREN IN THAT BOOK THE APPALLING VISTA BY BRIAN ROTHERY?)Richard Webster, (FOUNDER MEMBER OR THE BFMS, SET UP BY PAEDOPHILE RALPH UNDERWAGER AS A MEANS OF COVERING UP CHILD ABUSE BY CLAIMING THAT THE KIDS WHO HAD BEEN ABUSED WERE NOT TELLING THE TRUTH)who singled out South Wales as the home of "one of the most dangerous trawling operations" said that in excess of 80 or 90 per cent of the 581 or so suspects trawled by South Wales Police were "completely innocent".
I just hope they disinfected the room where all these creatures met up to plot against the police, and I suppose one small mercy is that they didn't invite that disgusting maggot Nigel Oldfield to the debating chamber.
David Cameron was there. Look at the list:
TUESDAY 14 MAY 2002
Members present:
Mr Chris Mullin, in the Chair
Mr David Cameron Bob Russell Mrs Janet Dean Mr Marsha Singh Bridget Prentice Angela Watkinson Mr Gwyn Prosser David Winnick
The Committee deliberated.
The Conduct of Investigations into Past Cases of Abuse in Children's Homes: Richard Webster, Bob Woffinden and David Rose, The Observer, were examined.
[Adjourned till Thursday 16 May at a quarter past Ten o'clock.
I have just recieved an email accusing me of being completly insane, for not wanting anything to do with any of the people who persecuted me on the Mothers for Justice site.
"Richards is completely insane, and has attacked me for no reason whatsoever on a number of occasions, for reasons only known to her"
I won't name the person who sent me this email, but I did ask this person to please stop emailing me, which request he has ignored. He knows perfectly well why I don't want anything to do with him, or any of his "Fathers Rights" friends.
Just posting this up for my own protection, and after the horrible persecution I have suffered anyone who knows me and knows what I have been through will completly understand why I need to do that.
This is from the The Scottish Association for the study of offending (SASO) conference 41st ANNUAL CONFERENCE at Dunblane Hydro Hotel 19th – 20th November, 2010
For some reason Blogger wont let me put a link to the conference PDF minuites so you will have to google for it.
Managing Risk and Reintegration Can we tell who is dangerous, can we really assess risk and can we manage their reintegration into communities? Are those with mental illness properly identified and then managed appropriately? Conference Chair: The Rt Hon Lord Gill, Lord Justice Clerk, QC, PhD, FRSE, FRSAMD THE SCOTTISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF OFFENDING SASO Office Bearers Honorary President: Rt Hon Lord Gill Chairman: Professor Alec Spencer Vice Chairman: Dan Gunn, OBE Hon Secretary: Margaret Small Hon Treasurer: Alasdair McVitie For over forty years SASO has been organising conferences which bring together people with a wide range of experience within the criminal justice system. Views may differ, but by listening, talking and sharing experiences, a better understanding of our common problems tends to develop. On some issues, consensus has been reached which has, on occasions, been translated into action from which the system has benefited. **************************************
Tom Halpin Tom Halpin took up his appointment as Chief Executive at SACRO in August 2009. Prior to this he was Deputy Chief Constable of Lothian & Borders Police having joined from Strathclyde Police in 2005 where he was Head of CID Operations. A member of ACPOS, he led the portfolio for Public Protection in Scotland, serving on a number of Scottish Government groups supporting the introduction of new legislation and arrangements for managing offenders and protecting children. A Chartered Director (IOD), Tom was a Director of Essential Edinburgh and a Council Member of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce.
****************************************
Donald Findlater Donald Findlater is Director of Research and Development with The Lucy Faithfull Foundation (LFF) – a child protection charity that works in all aspects of child sexual abuse prevention. He is also Director of Stop it Now! UK and Ireland, a child sexual abuse prevention campaign, supported by a freephone, confidential helpline. Donald was responsible for sex offender policy and practice in Probation Service in England prior to joining LFF in 1995 and managed the Wolvercote Clinic – the only specialist residential assessment and treatment centre for adult male sex offenders against children. He pioneered work in developing Circles of Support and Accountability (using groups of trained volunteers to support sex offenders to lead “good lives”) and has recently developed and piloted public education materials for the Home Office aimed at helping parents keep their children safe from sexual abuse.
"Tom Halpin Tom Halpin took up his appointment as Chief Executive at SACRO in August 2009. Prior to this he was Deputy Chief Constable of Lothian & Borders Police having joined from Strathclyde Police in 2005 where he was Head of CID Operations. A member of ACPOS, he led the portfolio for Public Protection in Scotland, serving on a number of Scottish Government groups supporting the introduction of new legislation and arrangements for managing offenders and protecting children. A Chartered Director (IOD), Tom was a Director of Essential Edinburgh and a Council Member of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce."
17th March 2012 Your Grace, Does a shepherd abandon his sheep? The Lord God Almighty gives us all a cross to bear. We all have a duty to perform; we all have a battle to be fought. Jonah tried to abandon his duty and run away from God, but he soon discovered there was nowhere to run to. When you first became Archbishop there was an outcry against you. You spoke some words about Freemason pledges that some people did not want to hear. You were right to speak the truth, it’s a shame you were able to hear the few voices raised in anger rather than the many that would have been raised in praise to God, had we a proper free press that allows the people to read the truth untainted with wilful God denying propaganda. My battle is against institutional child abuse. I have felt like giving up many times, and running away, but how can I give up a burden that God has placed on my shoulders, and where could I run to? God has even provided a goad to spur me on, in the shape of ex Senator Stuart Syvret, who is an atheist, yet is valiantly doing Gods work, in trying to protect Gods children by bringing child abusers to justice, and has poured out his own life as an offering to do so. If an atheist can honour the God who made him by such nobleness of spirit, how can I who have faith in the living God give up hope and run away? And if a broken down old woman like me can cling so determinedly to the promises of God then you can do likewise. You have your burden to carry, and to look at it, it seems impossible to carry such a large thing. But so did it seem impossible to feed 5000 hungry people with a little bit of bread and fish, but with the Lord nothing is impossible! When the Pope came you had a golden opportunity to put right a great wrong. You hugged him and offered him a chair – that was good, Christians are supposed to show others kindness and hospitality. But the chair you offered him was the wrong one. You didn’t respect God when you offered that particular chair to the Pope. If you can’t work out what you did wrong that day in offering that particular chair to that man, then you should ask God to show you. There were many people in the congregation that day that badly needed to hear the words of God, though the words might have seemed like arrows in their hearts at the time. It was your duty to ask God to put the words into your mouth that you needed to speak. It was not a day to read from a script. Jeremiah didn’t know what to say, and God filled his mouth with the right words. He would do the same for you, if you allowed him. You should have trusted in God to fill your mouth with the right words, and you should have remembered that you are His servant, and not the servant of the State. You should always put God first. It’s not too late to put things right. I am sorry for rebuking you, but someone has got to do it. May God bless you Barbara Richards (aka Zoompad author of “Tip”)
I wrote to him several times. I told him about Stuart Syvret being persecuted for blowing the whistle on institutional child abuse. I asked him why the Church of England was allowing Jesuit priests to take control of Protestant churches. I asked him to do something, say something about the secret family courts persecuting families.
I really thought he would be a great Archbishop. I am thoroughly dissapointed in him. He started off well, because he said that Freemason pledges were incompatable with Christian faith. That is why I thought he was going to be good.
The day the Pope came and sat on the throne of Westminster Abbey was the day he should have intervened - he had the power and the duty to do so. What he should have done is he should have got another chair - not a throne, just an ordinary everyday chair, with perhaps a cushion for to rest his old bones - for the Pope to sit on, and he should have been respectful and kind to him, of course he should have, because that is how we Christians ought to try to conduct ourselves, so he should have welcomed him into the church, as one should do with any poor sinner, but on no account ought he to have given that man the authority to address the congregation. Instead, the Archbishop should have addressed the people - perhaps reading some enlighening scriptural passages, I think 2 Peter 2 would have been entirely appropriate under the circumstances.
After the service, there should have been an invitation for any in the congregation to come forward for prayer and healing, should they have wanted to. I could see quite a few people in that cathedral who desperatly needed to find a closer walk with God, as they have gone seriously off the rails. The Archbishop had a golden opportunity to help so many lost souls that day, and he blew it, because of his wanting to please man instead of God. He forgot whose servant he really is.
Maggie Tuttle asks a very important question at 6:18:
Maggie Tuttle: Can I ask you a question? David Amis, my MP ...all the info I send to you David gets as well. I know he's brought it up in the house a couple of times, grandparents rights, but has he ever contacted you?
John Hemming MP: Um, he hasn't specifically contacted me but that's not necessarily wrong ...
Maggie Tuttle: The only reason I'm asking you is I can never understand why we've got thousands of people out here, British people, writing to their MPs, why is it they don't come together, and bring up what has happened?
AN EXCELLENT QUESTION! There is absolutly no reason at all whatsoever why John Hemming MP could not spend less than five minuites sending a note to David Amis MP for an informal meeting, perhaps over a coffee (though judging by those bottles on the tables in the video they may prefer some other liquid sustinance) and spend just a few minuites discussing these important issues. John Hemming could even, if he was really hard pressed for time, do as my MP Bill Cash does, and speak the letter for David Amis into a dictaphone, and that way he could probably get the letter done ready for his assistant to write up and email in less than 30 seconds!
I have been asked about my own stance on drugs, and I want to make a statement on my own views.
I don't take any illegal drugs at all, and as few legal ones as I possibly can, as my GP knows.
The reason I will never take recreational drugs is because I am a Christian, and the Lord Jesus told us to obey the government as far as we are able. The Lord Jesus told us to live in peace with each other as far as is possible, and to try to love one another, and not be rebellious.
I have campaigned against child abuse and corruption, but I do not want a revolution, I want a revival, as Martin Luther King and Henry George envisaged, where people see themselves as they really are and seek to become what God would have them be - beautiful, noble, loving beings that can hold their heads up and walk in the light.
I think a lot of people start taking drugs because they want to numb the pain of life in these corrupt times. If you look at what sorts of lives most drug dealers have had, they are never happy childhoods. I think they get sucked into drug dealing because they feel shut out of everything else. It is very sad for people to feel like whatever they do, no matter how hard they work and try to do things, its never enough. Feeling hopeless and helpless is very crushing to the human spirit.
I think there are some people who have been working in the secret family courts social engineering who really genuinly do think they have been doing a good thing. They sought to stop children getting sucked into crime and prostitution by taking them away from people they thought would be bad parents. What has happened though is that wicked people who like to hurt children have been getting children via the courts. Some of those poor children wont even realise they have been forcably adopted. Some of them will end up dealing drugs and in prostitution. Secret courts are a bad idea, they do nothing to protect children.
I think people need to try to look at what has gone wrong. I have been wronged by the courts and the police but I will never take anyone to court myself because I think some of the people who hurt me never actually wanted to hurt me. Jesus always said to forgive people, just as we ourselves have been forgiven. I've felt angry and hurt enough to want to take people to court, but the Lord has stopped me, He wants me not to take an eye for an eye. I talk with the Lord every day, sometimes I talk more than listen though!
I hope there will be a revival in the British Isles so very very much.
The Telegraph Friday 16th March 2012 Senior police officers investigated over murder evidence Four high-ranking police officers, including a chief constable, face a criminal investigation over claims that evidence was withheld from a murder trial. By John-Paul Ford Rojas 8:53AM GMT 23 Dec 2011 Adrian Lee, who heads Northamptonshire Police, together with his deputy Suzette Davenport, as well as Jane Sawyers, the assistant chief constable in Staffordshire, and Marcus Beale, the assistant chief constable in the West Midlands, were formally served with notices of investigation earlier this month. Mr Lee is also head of ethics and policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers. The claims relate to a murder investigation by Staffordshire police, where all four previously served, into the death of Kevin Nunes, who was taken to a country lane and shot dead in a drugs feud. In 2008, five men were jailed for the killing. Now the Independent Police Complaints Commission is looking into the investigation. The probe concerns allegations that material and evidence that could have affected the trial were withheld from the prosecution and the court, according to The Guardian newspaper. The Criminal Cases Review Commission, the official body that examines miscarriages of justice, is carrying out its own investigation into the case. Nine officers have been told they are under investigation. The issuing of the notices of investigation into an officer’s conduct does not imply any wrongdoing. Allegations being examined by the IPCC investigation include conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and misconduct in public office. The men convicted of the murder had lodged a challenge to their convictions with the Court of Appeal, which in turn asked the CCRC to investigate issues of disclosure in the original trial. Material uncovered by the CCRC was then referred to the IPCC. The four officers have not been suspended or arrested. In a statement the IPCC said: “We can confirm the Independent Police Complaints Commission is managing an investigation into allegations against a number of former and serving Staffordshire police officers.” Northamptonshire police authority said: “The authority has considered information provided by the IPCC and remains completely confident in both the chief constable and deputy chief constable.” Staffordshire police authority added: “We can confirm that a serving chief officer has been served with a notice advising them that their conduct is subject to investigation. Such notices are not judgmental in any way and we need to let the ongoing investigation run its course and establish the facts. As a result, the police authority has taken the decision not to suspend the officer. The force and authority are continuing to fully co-operate with the IPCC.” West Midlands police said: “The officer concerned has not been suspended. “As always, West Midlands police will co-operate fully with the IPCC investigation.”
FROM THE YORKSHIRE POST Sheffield student ‘sold down the river’ over TV Shack piracy case, says mum Published on Tuesday 13 March 2012 16:08
A SHEFFIELD student accused of infringing copyright laws is being “sold down the river” by the Government, his mother said today as the Home Secretary approved his extradition.
Sheffield Hallam University undergraduate Richard O’Dwyer, 23, allegedly earned thousands of pounds through advertising on the TVShack website before it was closed down by authorities in the United States.
Just hours before Prime Minister David Cameron arrives in the US for talks with President Barack Obama, his mother Julia warned the US was coming for the young, the old and the ill, “and our Government is paving the way”.
Mrs O’Dwyer, of Cheltenham, was told Home Secretary Theresa May had signed the order authorising her son’s extradition this afternoon, two months after a district judge said the allegations justified a trial in the US.
It follows a series of high-profile extradition cases, the latest of which saw retired British businessman Christopher Tappin, 65, of Orpington, Kent, extradited to the US last month to spend 23 hours a day alone in his cell awaiting trial over arms dealing charges.
And 10 years after the US first asked for Asperger’s sufferer Gary McKinnon to be extradited over charges he hacked in to military computers in 2002, McKinnon, who says he was looking for evidence of UFOs, is still awaiting the Home Secretary’s decision.
Mrs O’Dwyer said: “Today, yet another British citizen is being sold down the river by the British Government.
“Richard’s life - his studies, work opportunities, financial security - is being disrupted, for who knows how long, because the UK Government has not introduced the much needed changes to the extradition law.”
She said the so-called Natwest Three “were right when they said if it could happen to them, it could happen to anyone”.
Bankers Gary Mulgrew, Giles Darby and David Bermingham fought and lost a four-year battle against extradition to the US over allegations of conspiring with former Enron executives to dupe the bank out of 20 million US dollars (£12.7 million).
The men later admitted one charge of wire fraud and were sentenced to 37 months in jail.
Mrs O’Dwyer went on: “The US is coming for the young (Richard), the old (Chris Tappin) and the ill (Gary McKinnon) and our Government is paving the way.
“By rights, it should make for an interesting conversation between the Obamas and Camerons aboard Air Force One - but I’m not holding my breath.
“If Richard appears to have committed a crime in this country - then try him in this country.
“Instead the Home Secretary wants to send him thousands of miles away and leave him languishing, just like Chris Tappin, in a US jail, before he has a chance to demonstrate his innocence, under British law, of the allegations made against him.”
She added: “It’s disgusting. Next time it may be your son. I urge everyone who cares about unfair extradition to write to their MP and insist this disreputable law is changed.
“We are now carefully considering all Richard’s legal options.”
O’Dwyer faces up to 10 years’ jail if convicted of the allegations, which were brought following a crackdown by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.
His lawyer Ben Cooper has argued that the site did not store copyright material itself and merely pointed users to other sites, in the same way that Google and Yahoo operate.
Mr Cooper also said his client would be the first British citizen to be extradited for such an offence and would effectively become a “guinea pig” for copyright law in the US.
The US authorities allege that the student received more than 230,000 US dollars (around £147,000) in advertising revenue between January 2008 and 2010, when the site was shut down.
Critics, including Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and many MPs, have argued the existing treaty between the UK and the US is “one-sided” and must be changed.
But an independent review by retired Court of Appeal judge Sir Scott Baker last year found it was both balanced and fair.
O’Dwyer could now appeal to the High Court, and then to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, in a bid to block moves to extradite him to the US.
Richard O Dwyer ************************************************* THIS IS GLOUCESTERSHIRE Whip-round pays census fine
WELLWISHERS and fellow activists have stumped up most of census refusenik Roger Franklin's court fine.
Hundreds of cheques, each for a couple of pounds, were sent in support of campaigner Mr Franklin, who was ordered to pay a total of £460 in fines, surcharge and costs last month. That was after magistrates found him guilty of refusing to fill out the national census.
Pacifist Mr Franklin, who lives in Horsley, took his stance when defence firm Lockheed Martin won the government contract to conduct the survey.
Supporter Monica Jones from Frampton-on-Severn helped post the 222 cheques totalling £385 to the court. Donations pledged for the remaining £75 would be sent this week.
STROUD NEWS AND JOURNAL Stroud mayor and peace activist make court appearance for refusing to fill out census forms by Nick Wakefield STROUD mayor John Marjoram and veteran peace activist Roger Franklin appeared at Bristol Magistrates’ Court this morning, Wednesday, charged with not filling in their census forms.
Franklin was proven to have committed the offence and fined £360 on top of costs, while Marjoram pleaded not guilty and will return to the court for trial on May 31.
The pair, who were supported in court by a gathering of friends, were given an opportunity to halt proceedings by completing the forms but they declined and maintained their opposition to the census, based on its links to US arms dealer Lockheed Martin which won the government contract to gather the data.
Franklin, aged 84, who has declared his Horsley home independent of British Sovereign rule, refused to enter a plea - leaving it to prosecutor Alison Harris to prove he had failed to complete his forms, which is a criminal offence under the Census Act 1920.
She read a statement from an Office of National Statistics (ONS) non-compliance officer, who visited Franklin on May 26 last year in an attempt to get him to complete the form, which he refused. The bench was handed a six-page open letter Franklin had written outlining his ethical reasons for refusing to comply and warning he was ‘unlikely to co-operate with any penalties’ for doing so.
After considering the document the magistrates ruled that the evidence against him had been proven and he was fined £360 with £85 costs and a £15 victim surcharge. He was given 28 days to pay and warned he faces jail if he refused.
A not guilty plea was entered by Marjoram, aged 62, of Castle Street, Stroud, who had already submitted a letter to the court, detailing his reasons for rejecting the forms.
This outlined his moral objections to dealing with Lockheed Martin as a Quaker and suggested the Census Act conflicted with human rights legislation.
He also reiterated his suspicions that he and Franklin had been targeted for prosecution because of their high-profile anti-war stance.
However, Marjoram was advised that his points would not serve as an affective defence to the charge and was warned he faced significant costs if found guilty at a subsequent trial.
Despite this, Marjoram opted to maintain his not guilty plea and a trial date was set for 10am on May 31.
"Shocking new allegations unfolding in the American media reports on Britain's biggest ongoing organised crime offshore tax evasion fraud scandal took another twist with further startling revelations that have disclosed that the Prime Minister Rt. Hon. David Cameron MP is personally deeply involved in the ongoing "obstruction and co-ordinated cover-up" attempts in the Carroll Foundation Charitable Trust Case."
The following article has been sent by a user at TACOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY via Proquest, an information service of the ProQuest Company THE GARY LITTLE CASE -- COVERING UP CASES OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT [SUNDAY Edition] Seattle Times Seattle, Wash. Aug 21, 1988
Judges in this state are elected by the public to serve the public. When questions are raised about judicial conduct, they should be handled in as public a way as possible.
Questions about King County Superior Judge Gary Little's behavior had been raised over a period of years - by the prosecuting attorney's office, by fellow judges, by news reporters, by individuals who said they had been sexually exploited by Little. But few were ever resolved publicly.
Thus, the public generally either was unaware - or learned only belatedly - of information about Little that had been placed in the commission's hands on several occasions as early as 1981 and as late as last month. Mostly, the information concerned Little's out-of-court contacts with juvenile offenders. Copyright Seattle Times Aug 21, 1988
Full Text:
Judges in this state are elected by the public to serve the public. When questions are raised about judicial conduct, they should be handled in as public a way as possible.
Questions about King County Superior Judge Gary Little's behavior had been raised over a period of years - by the prosecuting attorney's office, by fellow judges, by news reporters, by individuals who said they had been sexually exploited by Little. But few were ever resolved publicly.
Primary responsibility for dealing with several of those questions lay with the state Commission on Judicial Conduct, created in 1980 under a voter-approved constitutional amendment. Voters were told that the commission's main purpose was to promote public confidence in the judicial system.
But the commission has not achieved its primary objective, mostly because of a mania for secrecy. It has allowed its concern for protecting judges against unfounded or frivolous complaints to overbalance the public interest. Its effectiveness also has been constrained by an ill-advised, self-imposed rule against investigating matters antedating the commission's establishment eight years ago.
Thus, the public generally either was unaware - or learned only belatedly - of information about Little that had been placed in the commission's hands on several occasions as early as 1981 and as late as last month. Mostly, the information concerned Little's out-of-court contacts with juvenile offenders.
Little enjoyed a professional reputation as a brilliant attorney and an able jurist. There was nothing conclusive in his public record to warrant removal from the bench. But rumors continued to circulate about the matters referred to the commission and, with the approach of a re-election campaign, reporters from both Seattle dailies began to reinvestigate in greater depth. Little then announced abruptly that he would not seek a third term and would leave the state.
The investigative reporting continued, which turned up shocking reports of sexual abuses of juvenile males as long ago as the 1960s. Only hours before The Post-Intelligencer's articles were published, Little took his own life.
If any lesson is to be learned from all this, it is that the process for dealing with such issues needs to be changed to prevent the neglect of responsibility that occurred in Little's case.
Lucy Berliner, at the Harborview Medical Center sexual-assault center, said the failure to remove Little may have contributed to the tragedy.
"It should have been more openly addressed,'' Berliner said, "than the way it has been. I think when he was a judge and he was in trouble and people knew about this, that should have been enough cause for him not to be a judge.''
Richard Holmquist, chief civil deputy in the prosecutor's office, also put the case into clearer perspective.
"Nobody's interest was served by a system that took seven years for the truth to come out,'' said Holmquist, who had handled the early probes of Little's out-of-court activities. "That can't be right.''
Indeed, it was not - and is not - "right.'' The system failed the public, and it failed Gary Little. link to above
He was posting horrible things on the Blog of Doom, jeering and sneering at me. I realised it was him when he called me "Babs". That was what he called me. He knew I hated being called that, and he did it all the more, to wind me up.
I would never have suspected that he was treacherous had he not tried his monkey business on me at Trafalger Square.
I was gutted. I thought he was a really nice man. I really looked up to him and felt safe with big men like him around. When he was so horrible to me over that, when he wouldn't even spare me a few seconds to even talk about it, I was really very upset. I felt as though other people were turning their backs on me, because I was making too much fuss over what everyone else thought was a small incident, but it wasn't small to me, because I felt stabbed in the back.
It was him on the Blog of Doom. He was pretending to be my friend, pretending to be other peoples friends as well.
Why did he do it? I have no idea, but I kept saying the Lord would not be pleased, and that the Lord would deal with him, and so He has!
Staffordshire Police have not contacted me since I complained a few weeks ago about the abusive comments that were left on my blog, but it looks like they have been doing some digging anyway! THANK YOU STAFFORD POLICE!!!!!
I hope this means that my ordeal might finally be coming to an end, I really do hope so. I would so love to have some sort of normal life, where I don't feel scared all the time.
"Police officers have been ordered to make fewer arrests, deal with more crimes over the phone and not respond to as many incidents. The remarkable advice has been issued by senior officers at Staffordshire Police who paid £480,000 to consultancy firm KPMG to carry out an 18-week review. The new policy means 'low-level' anti-social behaviour and neighbour disputes will be handled by untrained council workers instead of police ...In addition more offenders will be given penalty notices rather than being arrested, in the new plans unveiled yesterday. Consultants KPMG was brought in to help Staffordshire Police cope with budget cuts of £38 million and the loss of 300 officers and civilian staff since April 2010. But Chief Constable Mike Cunningham told Staffordshire Police Authority: 'This is about service improvement at a time of reduced resources."
Who are KPMG? From Wiki:
"KPMG is one of the largest professional services networks in the world and one of the Big Four auditors, along with Deloitte, Ernst & Young (EY) and PwC. Its global headquarters is located in Amstelveen, Netherlands.[1]
KPMG employs 145,000 people[2] and has three lines of services: audit, tax, and advisory. Its advisory services are further divided into three service groups - Management Consulting, Risk Consulting, and Transaction & Restructuring."
States of Jersey also using KPMG
"Over the last few months, the Health and Social Services Department (HSSD) have worked alongside colleagues from other Departments, with KPMG as advisers, to carry out a major review about what services Jersey needs now and in the future, and how we provide them... Deputy Anne Pryke Minister for Health and Social Services May 2011
"This report is provided on the basis that it is for the information of the States of Jersey only and that it will not be copied or disclosed to any third party or otherwise quoted or referred to, in whole or in part, without our prior written agreement"
Erm, wait a minuit - who actually pays the wages for these consultants? THE TAXPAYERS!!! So why should they not all be allowed to scrutinise these reports then?
That is almost (but not quite) as bad as a person being forced to have a lawyer allotted to them by a legal guardian in the Secret Family Courts for 18 months, and not actually to be allowed to have any contact at all with that lawyer!
If people pay for something, should they not be allowed to scrutinise what they are paying for?
Well, he didn't put me at the heart of policing, when I have had such a hellish time of it, because of being a VICTIM of serious crime, and to have police officers sent charging round my house a year ago falsely accusing me of sending malicious email, when if fact (as the email correspondence proves) it was actually the other way round, as I was the VICTIM of malicious email threats by the person who wasted police time making a malicious false accusation about me, as she had my personal and private social work and medical documents and was threatening to publish them online WHICH IS ILLEGAL, without my permission, and Staffordshire Police came dashing round without having the forsight to check the facts first - they had not even bothered to ask to look at the non existant malicious emails that I had been falsely accused of sending! And when I pointed that out and told Stafford Police that I was a victim of cyber crime (as well as child abuse, rape, molestation, fraud, being kept prisoner for 2 hours in an attempt to force me to sign documents against my will, stalking and other crimes) rather than a perpetrator, and asked them to look at real evidence of the crimes that had been committed against me, they told me that they were "drawing a line" under it all!!!!!
I note that Mike Cunningham is the ACPO lead for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transexual portfolios. I did notice the leaflets for reporting hate crimes against LGBT people on the counter of the police station when I reported serious crimes committed against me. It would be really really nice if hate crime could be applicable to everyone, regardless of their sexual leanings. Hate crime against people with mental health problems (caused by abuse) is just as hateful as hate crimes committed against LGBT.
LORD JAMES: "I'm sorry that Lord Strathclyde is not with us at the moment because this deeply concerns him also, but for the last 20 weeks since yesterday afternoon I have been engaged in a very strange dialogue with the two noble lords (LORD STRATHCLYDE AND LORD SASSOON)in the course of which I've been trying to bring to the attention the willing availability of a strange organisation which wishes to make a great deal of money available to assist the recovery of the economy in this country. For want of a better description I'll call them Foundation X - it's not their real name, but it'll do for the moment. Foundation X was introduced to me 20 weeks ago by a very eminent city firm, FSA controlled..."
"Christopher Story murdered, other journalists targeted in new fascist campaign Prominent veteran financial journalist Edward Harle (working under the pen name Christopher Story) wrote before his recent death that George Bush Senior, Barak Obama and other members of the criminal Washington D.C. establishment had ordered him killed. Story was poisoned during a March, 2010 visit to the US with a virus created by the Fort Meade biological warfare facility, according to close associates of Story who spoke to him the day before his July 14th death. Although there exists an antidote for this virus, Story was unaware he was poisoned with it until recently by which point his liver damage had progressed too far for treatment, according to the sources. Although Story is now dead, his sources will continue to provide the public with vital information about the secret financial war that is now raging towards its conclusion. The murder of Story will not go un-avenged, according to several sources inside the U.S. and UK military-industrial complex. The murder of Story is part of a broader, but doomed campaign to silence journalists. Jane Burgermeister, who did much to expose the pharmaceutical industry’s involvement in the creation of the H1N1 virus, contacted this writer today saying she feared for her life. She is the victim of systematic harassment by Austrian security service thugs and their corporate/government bosses. This writer has also been the target of multiple murder attempts. The same cabal that killed my colleague Paul Klebnikov (the former Forbes Moscow Bureau Chief) and killed Daniel Pearle of the Wall Street Journal, has been systematically murdering journalists around the world as a part of their effort keep in power and fool the public with their fake “war on terror.” Below is a copy of Christopher Story’s last report. There has been a systematic effort to remove this report from the internet so please disseminate it far and wide. Below that you will find a copy of an e-mail from Jane Burgermeister. Below that, you will find a list of the members of the Knights of Malta, who are a major part of the criminal cabal that is trying to turn Western Civilization into a fascistic dictatorship."
The Knights of Malta (including now deceased members):
Compiled by Eric Samuelson, J.D.
Edward Fenech Adami General Allavena George W. Anderson James Jesus Angelton Samuel Alito Julian Allason Joe M. Allbaugh Roberto Alejos Arzu Silvio Berlusconi Grandmaster, Prince Andrew Willoughby Ninian Bertie (cousin of QEII) deceased. (Former Prime Minister) Tony Blair Michael Bloomberg Elmer Bobst Marie Corinne Morrison Claiborne Boggs (Dame Lindy Boggs) Geoffrey T. Boisi John Robert Bolton Charles Joseph Bonaparte Prince Valerio Borghese Dr. Barry Bradley Nicholas Brady Joseph Brennan Monsignor Mario Brini Pat Buchanan James Buckley William F. Buckley, Jr. George H.W Bush George W. Bush Jeb Bush Precott Bush, Jr. Frank Capra (King) Juan Carlos Frank Charles Carlucci III William Casey Michael Chertoff Gustavo Cisneros (President) Bill Clinton (Cardinal) Terence Cooke Gerald Coughlin (Senator) John Danforth John J. DeGioia Cartha DeLoach Giscard d'Estaing Bill Donovan Allen Dulles Avery Dulles (Archbishop) Edward Egan Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr. Noreen Falcone (Count) Franz Egon John Farrell Matthew Festing (79th Grand Master) Edwin J. Feulner Francis D. Flanagan Raymond Flynn Adrian Fortescue (16th century) John C. Gannon Licio Gelli Reinhard Gehlen Burton Gerber Rudy Giuliani Emilio T. González Dr. Lawrence Gonzi Sir John Gorman CVO Thomas K. Gorman J. Peter Grace Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank Gen. Alexander Haig Cyril Hamilton Otto von Hapsburg William Randolph Hearst Edward L. Hennessy, Jr. (Baron) Conrad Hilton Heinrich Himmler Richard Holbrooke J. Edgar Hoover Leonard G. Horowitz Daniel Imperato Lee Iococca Carl Nicholas Karcher Francis L. Kellogg Joseph Kennedy (Senator) Ted Kennedy Henry A. Kissinger Bowie Kuhn Cardinal Pio Laghi Cathy L. Lanier Joseph P. Larkin Louis Lehrman General de Lorenzo Clara Booth Luce (Dame) Henry Luce Angus Daniel McDonald George MacDonald Nelson Mandela Avro Manhattan Alexandre de Marenches John McCone Thomas Melady Sir Stewart Menzies (Prince) Angelo di Mojana Thomas S. Monaghan Rupert Murdoch Joseph A. O’Hare Thomas 'Tip' O'Neill Francis (Frank) V. Ortiz Oliver North George Pataki Cardinal Patronus Robert James "Jim" Nicholson Oliver North Fra Giancarlo Pallavicini Fra Hubert Pallavicini Franz von Papen Baron Luigi Parrilli Juan Peron Peter G. Peterson Harold A.R. 'Kim' Philby Augusto Pinochet John J. Raskob (President) Ronald E. Reagan John Charles Reynolds George Rocca Nelson Rockefeller David Rockefeller Francis Rooney Rick Santorum General Giuseppe Santovito Antonin Scalia Phyllis Schlafly (Dame) Walter Schellenburg Joseph Edward Schmitz (Blackwater) Stephen A. Schwarzman Frank Shakespeare Martin F. Shea Clay Shaw William Edward Simon Jr. Jennifer Sims Frank Sinatra Frederick W. Smith Cardinal Francis Spellman Francix X. Stankard Steve Stavros Myron Taylor George Tenet Fritz Thyssen Richard Torrenzano Admiral Giovanni Torrinsi (Prince) Anton Turkul Albrecht von Boeselager Winfried Henckel von Donnersmark Thomas Von Essen Amschel Mayer von Rothschild Robert Ferdinand Wagner, Jr Kurt Waldheim General Vernon A. Walters Col. Albert J. Wetzel Canon Edward West Gen. William Westmoreland Gen. Charles A. Willoughby William Wilson Robert Zoellick Gen. Anthony Zinni Additions or corrections welcomed. The Oath of the Knights of Malta
Final note: All members of the Knights of Malta who wish to denounce the Cabal’s plans are encouraged and welcome to do so.
http://benjaminfulford.com/Edward.html
FROM CHARLIE'S DIARY
" Did somebody just try to buy the British government?
By Charlie Stross
(Hat tip to [REDACTED] over on LJ for spotting this one ...)
Hansard is the official printed transcript of the proceedings of the houses of parliament — in other words, the working log of the British government.
It is an authoritative primary source, and records every speech made in the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Interestingly, it also records words spoken under parliamentary privilege.
So when an eminent member of the House of Lords stands up six hours into a debate and blows the gaff on a shadowy foreign Foundation making a bid to buy the British state, and this is recorded in Hansard, one tends to sit up and take notice. And one takes even more notice when His Lordship tip-toes around actually naming the Foundation in question, especially after the throw-away about money-laundering for the IRA on behalf of the Bank of England. Parliamentary privilege only stretches so far, it seems, and Foundation X is beyond its reach. I'm going to quote at length below the cut — if you want to read the original, search for "1 Nov 2010 : Column 1538" which is where things begin to tip-toe into Robert Ludlum territory.
(NB: The venue is the House of Lords, at 10:42pm on November 1st, 2010.)
Lord James of Blackheath: At this point, I am going to have to make a very big apology to my noble friend Lord Sassoon [Treasury Minister], because I am about to raise a subject that I should not raise and which is going to be one which I think is now time to put on a higher awareness, and to explain to the House as a whole, as I do not think your Lordships have any knowledge of it. I am sorry that my noble friend Lord Strathclyde [Leader of the House] is not with us at the moment, because this deeply concerns him also. For the past 20 weeks I have been engaged in a very strange dialogue with the two noble Lords, in the course of which I have been trying to bring to their attention the willing availability of a strange organisation which wishes to make a great deal of money available to assist the recovery of the economy in this country. For want of a better name, I shall call it foundation X. That is not its real name, but it will do for the moment. Foundation X was introduced to me 20 weeks ago last week by an eminent City firm, which is FSA controlled. Its chairman came to me and said, "We have this extraordinary request to assist in a major financial reconstruction. It is megabucks, but we need your help to assist us in understanding whether this business is legitimate". I had the biggest put-down of my life from my noble friend Lord Strathclyde when I told him this story. He said, "Why you? You're not important enough to have the answer to a question like that". He is quite right, I am not important enough, but the answer to the next question was, "You haven't got the experience for it". Yes I do. I have had one of the biggest experiences in the laundering of terrorist money and funny money that anyone has had in the City. I have handled billions of pounds of terrorist money.
Baroness Hollis of Heigham [Labour]: Where did it go to?
Lord James of Blackheath: Not into my pocket. My biggest terrorist client was the IRA and I am pleased to say that I managed to write off more than £1 billion of its money. I have also had extensive connections with north African terrorists, but that was of a far nastier nature, and I do not want to talk about that because it is still a security issue. I hasten to add that it is no good getting the police in, because I shall immediately call the Bank of England as my defence witness, given that it put me in to deal with these problems.
The point is that when I was in the course of doing this strange activity, I had an interesting set of phone numbers and references that I could go to for help when I needed it. So people in the City have known that if they want to check out anything that looks at all odd, they can come to me and I can press a few phone numbers to obtain a reference. The City firm came to me and asked whether I could get a reference and a clearance on foundation X. For 20 weeks, I have been endeavouring to do that. I have come to the absolute conclusion that foundation X is completely genuine and sincere and that it directly wishes to make the United Kingdom one of the principal points that it will use to disseminate its extraordinarily great wealth into the world at this present moment, as part of an attempt to seek the recovery of the global economy.
I made the phone call to my noble friend Lord Strathclyde on a Sunday afternoon—I think he was sitting on his lawn, poor man—and he did the quickest ball pass that I have ever witnessed. If England can do anything like it at Twickenham on Saturday, we will have a chance against the All Blacks. The next think I knew, I had my noble friend Lord Sassoon on the phone. From the outset, he took the proper defensive attitude of total scepticism, and said, "This cannot possibly be right". During the following weeks, my noble friend said, "Go and talk to the Bank of England". So I phoned the governor and asked whether he could check this out for me. After about three days, he came back and said, "You can get lost. I'm not touching this with a bargepole; it is far too difficult. Take it back to the Treasury". So I did. Within another day, my noble friend Lord Sassoon had come back and said, "This is rubbish. It can't possibly be right". I said, "I am going to work more on it". Then I brought one of the senior executives from foundation X to meet my noble friend Lord Strathclyde. I have to say that, as first dates go, it was not a great success. Neither of them ended up by inviting the other out for a coffee or drink at the end of the evening, and they did not exchange telephone numbers in order to follow up the meeting.
I found myself between a rock and a hard place that were totally paranoid about each other, because the foundation X people have an amazing obsession with their own security. They expect to be contacted only by someone equal to head of state status or someone with an international security rating equal to the top six people in the world. This is a strange situation. My noble friends Lord Sassoon and Lord Strathclyde both came up with what should have been an absolute killer argument as to why this could not be true and that we should forget it. My noble friend Lord Sassoon's argument was that these people claimed to have evidence that last year they had lodged £5 billion with British banks. They gave transfer dates and the details of these transfers. As my noble friend Lord Sassoon, said, if that were true it would stick out like a sore thumb. You could not have £5 billion popping out of a bank account without it disrupting the balance sheet completely. But I remember that at about the same time as those transfers were being made the noble Lord, Lord Myners [former Labour Treasury Minister], was indulging in his game of rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic of the British banking community. If he had three banks at that time, which had had, say, a deficiency of £1.5 million each, then you would pretty well have absorbed the entire £5 billion, and you would not have had the sore thumb stick out at that time; you would have taken £1.5 billion into each of three banks and you would have absorbed the lot. That would be a logical explanation—I do not know.
My noble friend Lord Strathclyde came up with a very different argument. He said that this cannot be right because these people said at the meeting with him that they were still effectively on the gold standard from back in the 1920s and that their entire currency holdings throughout the world, which were very large, were backed by bullion. My noble friend Lord Strathclyde came back and said to me that he had an analyst working on it and that this had to be stuff and nonsense. He said that they had come up with a figure for the amount of bullion that would be needed to cover their currency reserves, as claimed, which would be more than the entire value of bullion that had ever been mined in the history of the world. I am sorry but my noble friend Lord Strathclyde is wrong; his analysts are wrong. He had tapped into the sources that are available and there is only one definitive source for the amount of bullion that has ever been taken from the earth's crust. That was a National Geographic magazine article 12 years ago. Whatever figure it was that was quoted was then quoted again on six other sites on the internet—on Google. Everyone is quoting one original source; there is no other confirming authority. But if you tap into the Vatican accounts—of the Vatican bank--— come up with a claim of total bullion—
Lord De Mauley [Government Whip]: The noble Lord is into his fifteenth minute. I wonder whether he can draw his remarks to a conclusion.
Lord James of Blackheath: The total value of the Vatican bank reserves would claim to be more than the entire value of gold ever mined in the history of the world. My point on all of this is that we have not proven any of this. Foundation X is saying at this moment that it is prepared to put up the entire £5 billion for the funding of the three Is recreation; the British Government can have the entire independent management and control of it—foundation X does not want anything to do with it; there will be no interest charged; and, by the way, if the British Government would like it as well, if it will help, the foundation will be prepared to put up money for funding hospitals, schools, the building of Crossrail immediately with £17 billion transfer by Christmas, if requested, and all these other things. These things can be done, if wished, but a senior member of the Government has to accept the invitation to a phone call to the chairman of foundation X—and then we can get into business. This is too big an issue. I am just an ageing, obsessive old Peer and I am easily dispensable, but getting to the truth is not. We need to know what really is happening here. We must find out the truth of this situation.
I am left rubbing my eyes.
Did a not-obviously-insane member of the government — a corporate troubleshooter and Conservative life peer — really just stand up in the House of Lords and announce that a shadowy Foundation (that might or might not represent the Vatican) was offering the British government an investment of umpty-billion pounds in order to reboot the economy — free, gratis, with no strings attached?
Or am I just imagining the "no strings attached" clause?"
