Loading...

Sunday, 25 March 2012

WARWICKSHIRE PAEDOPHILE JOURNALIST THOMAS O' CARROLL THE PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE (PIE)

I HAVE JUST FOUND THIS ARTICLE ABOUT THOMAS O' CARROLL, WHO WAS ONE OF THE FOUNDING MEMBERS OF THE WONDERLAND CLUB. I AM SHOCKED TO FIND THIS, AS I HAVE BEEN PERSECUTED BY THIS GANG OF EVIL PAEDOPHILES AND WANT TO ALERT OTHER VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE TO THIS ROTTON CORE OF PREDATORY INDIVIDUALS. THESE MEN ARE UTTERLY RUTHLESS, AS I FOUND OUT DURING MY 7 YEAR BATTLE IN THE SECRET FAMILY COURTS. THEY GANG UP ON THEIR VICTIMS AND WILL PERSECUTE THEM TO DEATH IF THEY CAN, AND LAUGH ABOUT IT AFTERWARDS. THIS ARTICLE OUGHT TO BE ON THE FRONT PAGE OF EVERY NATIONAL NEWSPAPER, AND THE POLICE OUGHT TO HAVE ROUNDED UP EVERY SINGLE MEMBER OF THIS SICK GROUP. BUT INSTEAD WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT THESE CREATURES HAVE MANAGED TO INFLUENCE PARLIAMENT AND GET THE POLICE AND THE COURTS TO PERSECUTE THEIR GROWN UP VICTIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWERS OF CHILD ABUSE!

THANK YOU TO MARTYN LEEK AND THE SUNDAY MERCURY FOR THIS ARTICLE.

********************************************************************


SECRET LIFE OF BRITAIN'S MOST EVIL PERVERT; Smuggled indecent photos of children.

Sunday Mercury (Birmingham, England)

July 21, 2002
By MARTYN LEEK

WITH his grey hair and calm demeanour, Thomas O'Carroll looks just like your average, respectable, middle-aged man. But for the past 20 years he has been living a secret life as Britain's most evil pervert.

He is the founder of the infamous Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) which publicly advocated and promoted sex with children.

And he has travelled the world, visiting nudist camps and attending perverted conventions to discuss his sick views.

Last week the 56 year-old from Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, was found guilty of smuggling indecent photographs of children into the country.

Customs Officers had intercepted boxes of his personal belongings at Heathrow Airport last year.

O'Carroll had sent the boxes from Qatar in the Middle East where he had been working as a journalist - his sick secret kept from his colleagues - to an address in East London.

Officers discovered three photo albums containing a hoard of 93 photographs, of which 54 featured naked or scantily-clad children.

Seven selected by the prosecution depicted pre-pubescent boys and girlsboys and girls

mercurialisannua.
..... Click the link for more information., aged two to 10, and were almost certainly taken without the knowledge of their parents.

In court O'Carroll tried to claim the pictures were art. He said they were 'artistic street photography' and likened them to a controversial exhibition of naked children at London's Saatchi Gallery.

The jury at Southwark Crown Court weren't fooled. He was convicted on three counts, as he calmly took notes of what the judge was saying.

But this is not his first brush with the law.

In 1981 O'Carroll was jailed at the Old Bailey for two years for corrupting public morals after he published a worldwide contact sheet for PIE, the organisation of which he was chairman.

He confessed to the court that he was attracted to young boys and said that he wanted to change public attitudes about adults having sex with children.

His trial was controversial because it was revealed that a senior diplomat had links with the child sex group.

O'Carroll has twice lost his job because of his sick lust. While teaching in Leicester he became attracted to a pupil and was dismissed when he refused to undergo psychiatric treatment.

Then Coventry-born O'Carroll was forced to leave his job as the press officer for the Open University amid a blaze of publicity about his involvement with PIE.

Later he published a book called Paedophilia paedophilia or US pedophilia
Noun

the condition of being sexually attracted to children [Greek pais, paid- child + philos loving]

Noun 1. : The Radical Case and a pamphlet entitled Paedophilia: Some Questions and Answers. In the pamphlet he wrote: 'What do paedophiles do sexually to children? It's not so much what they do to children, as what adult and child do together.'

In 1999 Birmingham City Council was criticised for having one of his books on the shelves of Central Library.

Last year O'Carroll was discovered on holiday at a nudist camp in France. There he showered and dined while he watched naked children play in a swimming pool, their parents blissfully unaware of who was in their midst.

He had gone to France after attending an international paedophile paedophile or US pedophile
Noun

a person who is sexually attracted to children

Noun 1. paedophile - an adult who is sexually attracted to children
pedophile convention in Berlin.

He has regularly contributed articles to websites which advocate sex with children. It is also believed that he is involved with two other child sex groups: GWAIN (Gentlemen Without An Interesting Name) and IPCE IPCE Interprocess Communication Environment
IPCE Incident Photon to Current Efficiency (solar cells)
IPCE International Pedophile and Child Emancipation
IPCE Independent Parametric Cost Estimate
IPCE Interprofessional Cancer Education (International Paedophile and Child Emancipation Group).

An expert in child abuse at the University of Warwick In the 1960s and 1970s, Warwick had a reputation as a politically radical institution.[3] More recently, the University has been seen as a favoured institution of the British New Labour government. has warned that O'Carroll is probably still involved in a paedophile network.

Christine Harrison, a lecturer in social studies who specialises in studying the effects of child abuse, said: 'Sexual offenders, paedophiles and menwho are involved in this type 'Yet people who have photos like these are usually very close to the abuse which has taken place.

'He will probably be involved in a network with other people, in this country and abroad. He may have been caught smuggling the end product but there is a background behind the photos from the procurement of the child, to the coercion, to threats and then acts of violence.'

Detective Inspector Darren Brookes, of West Midlands Police West Midlands Police is the Home Office police force responsible for policing the metropolitan county of West Midlands in England.

It is the second largest in the United Kingdom after London's Metropolitan Police [1]. It covers an area with nearly 2. Paedophile Unit, said: 'O'Carroll is unique because of the way he promotes his views.'

Judge Geoffrey Rivlin, QC, adjourned O'Carroll's case for four weeks for pre-sentence reports but has allowed him bail. He has to stay at his home address, sign the sex offenders' register, and report daily to Leamington police.

of child pornography Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest. are from very diverse backgrounds. They have many different ways of justifying their behaviour. Some say they are sorry and that it was in their past.

'Others are in denial and can see nothing wrong in what they do. They try to give their actions a responsibility by referring to academic sources.

'They band together in groups with people who have views which reinforce their own warped values.

'They attack people who question them and ask 'What evidence is there that I have harmed a child by my actions?'.'

'We know people who attempt to give their actions some sort of weird respectability like Thomas O'Carroll. They are proud of their views and can be very clever people.

9 comments:

Zoompad said...

Sorry but I cannot find the origional link to this article, but I have been trying to find out more about this sicko for years, and until this morning had no idea he was from Birmingham, I assumed he lived in Ireland

Zoompad said...

"In 1999 Birmingham City Council was criticised for having one of his books on the shelves of Central Library"

This makes me feel so angry. Birmingham City Council have NOT got a copy of the Allan Levy /Barbara Kehan Staffordshire Pindown report, so that victims of these sickos can read for themselves what was said and maybe find help.

Its virtually impossible to find any answers or help from the people who are SUPPOSED to be paid to help victims of these horrible crimes, because what happens is that paedos and paedo protecting scumbags worm their way into getting the funding for councelling. The victims of these horrible crimes, if they are lucky they get pushed into the long grass, the less fortunate ones end up being persecuted in secret courts and deliberatly criminalised.

I have had two Pindown victims contact me, who have not been able to read a copy of the Pindown report, and yet Birmingham City Council will promote the vile writings of Tom O' Carroll! It makes me want to weep.

Anonymous said...

i had a sexual relationship when younger it was very mutual.yes i was 12 and he was in his twenties but i knew what i was doing and it has not changed my orientation and i have fond memories.im sure this is not what you want to hear but i have a right to voice my personal memory on this issue.

Zoompad said...

"Anonymous said...
i had a sexual relationship when younger it was very mutual.yes i was 12 and he was in his twenties but i knew what i was doing and it has not changed my orientation and i have fond memories.im sure this is not what you want to hear but i have a right to voice my personal memory on this issue.

28 March 2013 10:22 "

I've published your comment, but have to tell you that I won't be publishing any more of your pro paedo comments unless you attach an identifiable name to them. Thats fair enough, isn't it? Yes, you can have your say, but if what you say is attempting to defend underage sex you're going to have to identify yourself!

Anonymous said...

Dear Zoompad, I have read a lot of your comments on many different sites, and generally I have a great deal of time for what you have to say. In connection with your comments on Anonymous' (not me) item, you are obviously aware that the comment is made by somebody who you would normally regard as a victim. You would not normally regard a victim's comments as being "pro paedo", would you?
This particular comment, however rare it may be, in your opinion, is still a valid comment, and we do not know how many other "victims" there are who have all been through similar events and have emerged unscathed.
There are questions where there is coercion, and rightly so, but this seems like a variation on the idea that all of us have to go through a homosexual phase in our teens, as this a part of normal growing up, and we are not a completely properly developed adult if this part of our development is missing.
Sorry to mess with your neat and tidy ideas of what should and should not go on between adults and children (although 12 years old could be argued as being "young adult" (debatable)). The fact is, as with everything, that those who feel that they have been abused will always want to speak out about it, whereas those who maybe have been through the same or similar experience and put it down to just that, experience, do not seem to suffer the trauma traditionally associated with such incidents.
Perhaps abuse is just in the mind of the beholder? Yes, I am being deliberately provocative here, but I do want to stress that it is more a question of consent and willingness than anything else.
One could take the view that any activity forced upon a young person that was unwelcome, not necessarily sexual, could be construed as abuse.
When I was young it was regarded as "normal", for example for parents, particularly fathers to beat their children. It was called "bringing them up properly". Now I am not condoning this at all, but it just shows how social attitudes evolve over the years. Perhaps the pendulum has swung too far the other way, and one's enjoyment of a meal or a drink, or even a walk has to be marred by a child "expressing" itself!
Sorry to have got carried away with my rant here and gone off topic, but to bring it back on course, what I feel the previous commenter was trying to say was not that they were in favour of paedophilia, but that their brush with it had left no lasting harm, unless of course, you consider that this is demonstrated by their writing on your site in the 1st place!
In summary, if the "victim" can come forward and make such comments as above, I feel that you feel that this has undermined your own views on how a "victim" should respond, and made you stop and think that not all of these sort of encounters leave a disastrous scar on somebody's personality that will consign them to a life of misery thereafter. Please correct me if I am wrong in my interpretation of your response here.
Who is to blame when it is the younger participant doing the seducing and grooming?
It seems a crazy state of affairs that 2 inexperienced people under the age of 18 (and therefore seen by some as "children") can indulge in sexual activity without committing a crime, although they are both under age, but if a person who was over 18 were to watch them, even inadvertently, let alone take a picture of them, that person would be guilty of a criminal offence. Perhaps there should be a law that protects young people from each other?
Please do not be offended by my remarks. I do feel that most of your ideas are spot on, just a little unfair on Anonymous.

truthseeker said...

I really need to talk to you about this character Tom O'Carroll, I think i may have some very damning information regarding him and I am unsure where to turn...

Zoompad said...

Don't know what to suggest Truthseeker, as there is plenty of damning information out in the open already about the paedophile Tom O Carroll, yet how come he is not in jail already? How come the mainstream media is not screaming for that filthy and dangerous pervert to be arrested immediatly for plotting against children?

I don't know to do either, I really don't, and I'm wondering why God is letting these things happen.

Zoompad said...

If you just want me to read something and you don't want me to post it on the blog, just put NOT FOR PUBLICATION at the top, and I promise I will only read it then delete it.

Zoompad said...

Re: anonymous: "Please do not be offended by my remarks"

I'm not offended, neither am I intimidated.

I already know all about the sublety of the devil. It isn't particularly knowledge that I wanted to find out, but God in his wisdom has laid it onto my shoulders as a burden, just as he did with poor Job. Perhaps God thought I was sturdy enough to bear it, though I feel as weak as a baby most of the time.

"Sorry to mess with your neat and tidy ideas of what should and should not go on between adults and children "

I have to remind you that they are not my ideas but God's. They are God's neat and tidy ideas. I'm just a lady who has read the Bible and read the Word of God. I'm not anyone special, just a lady who got abused as a child. God let me be caught up in the abuse, my childhood came to an abrupt end, my Grammer School education that I had won a scholership for was taken away from me, and my career prospects were smashed to smithereens, and I have it in my SS records Staffordshire Social Services advising that my education be terminated and me to be put into any old job, I have that in writing.

Don't mistake me for God, I am just a lady who got abused as a child who has called on God for help!!!