Wednesday, 9 March 2011
THE WICKEDEST SHOW ON EARTH
Anyone with even a tiny speck of common sense can see that this is a really repulsive and evil pagent. So why are so many world leaders in attendance? Were they all drunk, or drugged or what? HOW CAN ANYONE THINK THIS IS RIGHT?
Listen to the screams when the sacrificial fire is lit. Do they sound authentic to you? They sound like screams of terror and pain to me.
Even if this really is a mock human sacrifice (and I am convinced that it is genuine), IT IS HORRIBLE!
What are the International Police going to do about this? Have the MET done anything about this? What has David Cameron to say about this event, and has he ever attended it? These are questions that we all ought to be asking, and I am going to write to him about this. I hope other people will also write about this, it must not be ignored any more, it is evil.
Monday, 7 March 2011
LIVERPOOL TAKES A STAND AGAINST JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
About three years ago, a group of smirking lawyers were heard in a Liverpool court lobby sniggering amongst themselves by a friend of mine, a mother whose life was made into a living nightmare by the secret family courts trying to steal her son. She heard these scumbags say "WE ARE UNTOUCHABLE"
I remember this so well, because I found it deeply upsetting. I wept before the Lord and asked Him to wipe the smirk off all their faces.
Today, I think those wicked wicked scumbags will not be feeling so confident.
People are not very happy about judicial corruption in this country.
I remember this so well, because I found it deeply upsetting. I wept before the Lord and asked Him to wipe the smirk off all their faces.
Today, I think those wicked wicked scumbags will not be feeling so confident.
People are not very happy about judicial corruption in this country.
Sunday, 6 March 2011
SOME NICE MUSIC
I know there's a few people who are going through a really bad patch at the moment, praying for them, and also thought it might be nice to share stuff that helps me to cope when I am going through bad stuff. I like to listen to nice music, and so here are a few tracks that I really really love, sorry its not much but its my way of giving my brave friends who are hurting a cyber hug, there's no hidden meanings or anything, just good musicality, I like it anyhow. Hope you like the music. xx
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
A REPOSTING FROM STUART SYVRETS BLOG
I just think this needs to be read and digested properly, and am reposting it here so that more people can see it:
STUART SYVRET
"In yesterday's debate in the Jersey parliament - the Home Affairs Minister, Ian Le Marquand - launched into a diatribe of ethically and intellectually bankrupt abuse against the the Police Officer who led the historic abuse investigation, Lenny Harper.
The fact is - the work of Lenny and his team did successfully investigate - charge - and secure the conviction and jailing of - a number of the most despicable child abusers; abusers who - for decades - had been protected by the "traditional" Jersey authorities.
Lenny his issues a brief response to the dishonesty words of Ian Le Marquand, which I reproduce here":
LENNY HARPER
"I believe that in the absence of anything truthful and evidence based to say today, Ian Le Marquand has again launched a personal attack on myself in another pathetic attempt to deflect from the sordid cover up of the abuse meted out to innocent children in the care of the States of Jersey. These desperate rantings are the hallmark of those not articulate or reasoned enough to look at the evidence and use the power of logic to deduce that they have been caught with their trousers well and truly down. Firstly though, let me make a couple of things clear. The vitriol which he spits out humiliates only him. Secondly, it pales into insignificance into the further abuse he has heaped upon the victims by the stout defence, by all foul means, he continues to mount on behalf of the child abusers he uses his position to protect. He does this by ignoring the evidence and continuing to mouth, robot like, the discredited version of events circulated by those who sought to defend the indefensible. I could easily repeat again, the evidence which nailed the lies about so many of his pronouncements. However, do I really need to go into "fleshed and fresh", cellars which he said didn't exist, or indeed, the mystery spending which far exceeded mine even though he and his cronies tried to hide that also. It really is unnecessary, particularly as in the last week, a number of blogs have published it all again. He likes to project himself as a religious man. He is certainly as slimy, nasty and cowardly as the religious zealots who crawled out from under the rocks in Northern Ireland and elsewhere. He should thank his lucky stars, and whatever type of god he worships, that he did not have to experience the type of horrors that so many victims recounted to us during that enquiry, accounts which he dare not face up to.
Lenny Harper."
STUART SYVRET
"In yesterday's debate in the Jersey parliament - the Home Affairs Minister, Ian Le Marquand - launched into a diatribe of ethically and intellectually bankrupt abuse against the the Police Officer who led the historic abuse investigation, Lenny Harper.
The fact is - the work of Lenny and his team did successfully investigate - charge - and secure the conviction and jailing of - a number of the most despicable child abusers; abusers who - for decades - had been protected by the "traditional" Jersey authorities.
Lenny his issues a brief response to the dishonesty words of Ian Le Marquand, which I reproduce here":
LENNY HARPER
"I believe that in the absence of anything truthful and evidence based to say today, Ian Le Marquand has again launched a personal attack on myself in another pathetic attempt to deflect from the sordid cover up of the abuse meted out to innocent children in the care of the States of Jersey. These desperate rantings are the hallmark of those not articulate or reasoned enough to look at the evidence and use the power of logic to deduce that they have been caught with their trousers well and truly down. Firstly though, let me make a couple of things clear. The vitriol which he spits out humiliates only him. Secondly, it pales into insignificance into the further abuse he has heaped upon the victims by the stout defence, by all foul means, he continues to mount on behalf of the child abusers he uses his position to protect. He does this by ignoring the evidence and continuing to mouth, robot like, the discredited version of events circulated by those who sought to defend the indefensible. I could easily repeat again, the evidence which nailed the lies about so many of his pronouncements. However, do I really need to go into "fleshed and fresh", cellars which he said didn't exist, or indeed, the mystery spending which far exceeded mine even though he and his cronies tried to hide that also. It really is unnecessary, particularly as in the last week, a number of blogs have published it all again. He likes to project himself as a religious man. He is certainly as slimy, nasty and cowardly as the religious zealots who crawled out from under the rocks in Northern Ireland and elsewhere. He should thank his lucky stars, and whatever type of god he worships, that he did not have to experience the type of horrors that so many victims recounted to us during that enquiry, accounts which he dare not face up to.
Lenny Harper."
Removed
I have been asked to remove this persons article, as I was told I did not have permission to repost it.
Which is quite puzzling to me, as I would have thought that the person, who claims to be against child abuse, would have been pleased about me reposting it. But in no uncertain terms, I have been told otherwise.
We anti child abuse bloggers - particularly those of us who have suffered abuse - tend to take it as a given that if one of us posts something the others will have full permission to repost it, so as to give the article as much publicity as possible.
So I am very suprised about this persons attitude.
Which is quite puzzling to me, as I would have thought that the person, who claims to be against child abuse, would have been pleased about me reposting it. But in no uncertain terms, I have been told otherwise.
We anti child abuse bloggers - particularly those of us who have suffered abuse - tend to take it as a given that if one of us posts something the others will have full permission to repost it, so as to give the article as much publicity as possible.
So I am very suprised about this persons attitude.
JOSEPH ROWNTREE - A MAN WHO TRIED TO HELP PEOPLE
Joseph Rowntree, the son of a Quaker grocer, was born in York on 24th May, 1834. After only five years of schooling Joseph began work as a grocer. He started with his father at fourteen but part of his apprenticeship involved working in London. While working in the city Joseph became very interested in politics and regularly attended debates at the House of Commons.
Rowntree returned to work for his father but in 1869 he left to join his brother, Henry Rowntree, who owned the Cocoa, Chocolate & Chicory Works in York. The company only employed thirty workers at the time, but under Joseph's influence the company grew rapidly and by the end of the century it was an enormous international concern with over 4,000 employees. One important development was the decision to produce Fruit Pastilles in 1881. Other new products included Chocolate Drops, Fruit Gums and Jelly Babies.
On the death of Henry in 1883, Joseph Rowntree became the owner of the company. As well as running this fast-growing business, Rowntree devoted a considerable time to public work. He served on the committee responsible for two Quaker schools in York and taught in an Adult School on Sunday. Rowntree also played a leading role in the establishment of the York Public Library. He also provided a park in York as a memorial to those killed during the First World War.
Influenced by the book Poverty, A Study of Town Life, written by his son Benjamin Seebohm Rowntree, Joseph Rowntree attempted to improve the quality of his employees' lives. He provided a library in the factory and free education for workers under seventeen. A social welfare officer, doctor and a dentist were employed to provide free services for the workforce. Joseph Rowntree also donated £10,000 in 1906 to establish a Pension Fund for his workers. One of his main innovations was to give the workers a say in the appointment of their immediate supervisors.
Rowntree's major concern was to find ways of reducing poverty. In 1863 he produced a statistical study on the links between crime and poverty. Two years later he published a second study, Pauperism in England and Wales. Rowntree also provided practical help for the poor and in 1901 he purchased 123 acres at New Earswick to build houses for low-income families.
Rowntree was a supporter of the Liberal Party. In 1907 he funded the Nation, a weekly journal that advocated social reform. Three years later he helped purchase the Morning Leader and The Star, in order to stop the newspapers falling into the hands of supporters of the Conservative Party.
A long time active member of the Temperance Society, Rowntree wrote several books and pamphlets on the subject including The Temperance Problem and Social Reform (1900), Public Control of the Liquor Trade (1903) and The Taxation of the Liquor Trade (1906).
Rowntree was very critical of the Anglican Church for what he considered to be its lack of interest in dealing with social injustice. Rowntree was also in favour of abolishing the House of Lords, an institution that he believed was hampering social progress. Rowntree retained his interest in politics and social welfare until his death in 1925.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)