I see Esther Ranzen has been sacked from NAPAC.
Esther Rantzen, the founder of ChildLine, has been sacked by the National Association for People Abused in Childhood. The decision follows Rantzen's admission that she blocked her ears to all the rumours about Jimmy Savile...According to Unreality TV, Mr Peter Saunders, the Chief Executive and founder of the NAPAC, said:
In the light of her admission that she heard rumours about Savile but did nothing, I am going to ask the trustees if they feel she is an appropriate patron.
A number of people have contacted us to say they don’t feel she is.
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/334919#ixzz29Xi5iMd1
I hope Esther Ranzen gets to read this blog post, I don't know how to contact her, so if anyone does can you please point this blog post out to her?
I asked NAPAC to help me a few years ago - I was being maliciously persecuted in the secret family courts, falsely accused of Parental Alienation Syndrome (which was invented by an American paedophile) and Richard Gardner's "Threat Therapy" used on me for years. I was in great distress and eventually became so run down that I ended up seriously ill in hospital with pneumonia. I am one of the Staffordshire Pindown child abuse survivors, and have gradually realised that Stafford Police have colluded with other agencies and the Government to cover up institutional child abuse, and persecute the victims to keep it all hidden, my solicitor Richard Wise, who died very suddenly ten years ago was helping us Pindown victims, and he discovered that many of us were being deliberatly criminalised and jailed.
Peter Saunders was very nasty to me. I do have the email exchange I had with him somewhere amongst my files, but I had my computer hacked repeatedly and so I do not have them on this computer but on saved files, which I have had to hide away from my home due to my house being ransacked and documents taken a few years ago. Basically, I told NAPAC what I had endured, and added that I had grown so used to being set up by one agency after another that I didnt really expect NAPAC would help me, but hoped that they would.
Peter Saunders must know how broken someone like me has become, with repeated abuse from one agency that was SUPPOSED to be there to help people like me, but didnt, and have some understanding of how people subjected to malicious vindictive persecution for years on end end up not knowing who they can trust, like a dog who has been repeatedly beaten and is crouched in the corner frightened of any hand that goes near it. But what he did is inexcusable. Instead of making any allowances for me being sceptical that NAPAC would help me, he confirmed my fears by falsely accusing me of being aggressive to the female member of staff that opened my email!!!
I was horrified when I read what Peter Saunders had written, and posted an email back, telling him that I had no intention of attacking or upsetting anyone, but that I had suffered so much abuse from agencies supposedly set up to help child abuse victims that I was sceptical of any agency, but was bravely trying to get help anyway. I told him that I did trust Shy Keenan and Sarah Payne, and asked him to pass on my details of how I had been abused and contact details to them.
Peter Saunders washed his hands of me instead. He did absolutly nothing to help me. Also, the top of the list in my area of agencies that he is recommending to help people like me is Emerge. They were the ones who maliciously sent me to St Georges Psychiatric Hospital for child abuse councelling, despite me begging them to send me somewhere else, as that was one of the places I was abused at as a child. They didnt listen, and I ended up in A and E after a "therapy" session in which I had my head opened up and had been talking about some of the horrible things that had been done to me as a child, and then left to make my way home, past the gloomy buildings of St Georges Psychiatric Hospital and Stafford Prison, to the bus stop. My head started spinning as if there was a big thunderstorm inside, and I ended up on the pavement, unable to feel my lips and arms and legs, so someone called for an ambulance. That is what happened to me, and at first I tried to give Emerge the benefit of the doubt, but after another 8 councelling sessions at another, safer venue, with a man who promised me that the councelling sessions were confidential, but finding that little snippits were becoming known to other people who had no rights to know them, I now have no doubt in my mind that Emerge was acting maliciously towards me and had sent me for councelling on purpose at St Georges, knowing full well what was likely to happen.
I hope Esther Ranzen gets to read this. I don't believe she is one of the bad ones, and that she genuinly does want to stop child abuse. Perhaps I am being naive, but I still believe she isn't malicious to child abuse survivors.