Saturday 17 May 2014

ROY WALMSLEY AND KAREN WHITE, NOTE 37, CHAPTER 2 OF TOM O CARROLLS BOOK PAEDOPHILIA THE RADICAL CASE

https://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/chap02.htm

Even a Home Office research report has recently given an important measure of official recognition to the fact that children over ten (this being the age of criminal responsibility: no attempt was made to assess consent in younger children) can and do consent in sexual acts with adults. The report refers to child 'partners' in such sexual acts, rather than 'victims'. 37

37. R. Walmsley and K. White, Sexual Offences, Consent and Sentencing, Home Office Research Study No. 54, 'HMSO, London, 1979, Chapter 2.


http://www.worldcat.org/title/sexual-offences-consent-and-sentencing/oclc/877026434?referer=di&ht=edition

Sexual offences, consent and sentencing



Author:

Roy Walmsley; Karen White



Publisher:

London H.M.S.O. 1979.



Series:

Research studies (Great Britain. Home Office), no.54.; Reports (Great Britain. Home Office. Research Unit)



Edition/Format:

Book : Government publication : EnglishView all editions and formats



Database:

WorldCat



Rating:


(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.



Subjects

Sex crimes -- England.



More like this

Similar Items


Details




Material Type:

Government publication



Document Type:

Book



All Authors / Contributors:

Roy Walmsley; Karen White
Find more information about:Roy WalmsleyKaren White



ISBN:

0113406940 9780113406944



OCLC Number:

877026434



Description:

vi,73p ill 25cm sd



Series Title:

Research studies (Great Britain. Home Office), no.54.; Reports (Great Britain. Home Office. Research Unit)



Responsibility:

by Roy Walmsley and Karen White.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

poofsterism soon to be compulsory

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=97586

Zoompad said...

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CEcQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%2Fabout%2FSexual_Offences_Consent_and_Sentencing.html%3Fid%3DBOBkQgAACAAJ&ei=1Cd3U47ZI8TZOduMgZgN&usg=AFQjCNGf1V_MYwcX-3ZqCKF-Cu2ShaoaEw&sig2=srS1WsF6rmTqaMDOs-_w_w

About the author (1979)




Karen White was born in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She attended college at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana, where she obtained a Bachelor of Science in Management. Her first book, In the Shadow of the Moon was a double finalist for the Romance Writers of America RITA Award. The Girl on Legare Street hit The New York Times Best Seller list in November 2009, and On Folly Beach in May 2010, which was also a NYT bestseller. Most of White's novels are based in the low-country of the southeastern United States. Some of her other titles include: The House on Tradd Street, The Lost Hours and The Memory of Water. Her title Sea Change made the New York Times Best Seller List for 2012. Her title The Time Between made the New York Times Best Seller List for 2013.


Bibliographic information







Title

Sexual Offences, Consent, and Sentencing, Volume 66, Issue 2
Home Office Research Unit report
Issue 54 of Home Office research studies
Issue 54 of Research studies - Home Office, Great Britain Home Office
Sexual Offences, Consent, and Sentencing, Roy Walmsley



Authors

Roy Walmsley, Karen White



Edition

illustrated



Publisher

H.M. Stationery Office, 1979



ISBN

0113406940, 9780113406944



Length

76 pages

Zoompad said...

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CIEBEBYwCA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.examiner.com%2Farticle%2Fkaren-white-talks-about-the-girl-on-legare-street&ei=aCh3U8nLG8GAONqRgLgL&usg=AFQjCNHTW3YFcU8nVzcERJUW5p_V0OjEjw&sig2=JOcxMK0nFpIzS1fu4WaKMQ

Zoompad said...

What kind of people are influencing Government policy with these Home Office reports?

Is there no check on the character of the people who are given these influencial roles?

Zoompad said...

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKaren_White&ei=Qyl3U-nQI8KxOuPWgFA&usg=AFQjCNEt7jGLs64hsculdhR6Nes6Mpg_iw&sig2=aI3jBetrxHEFuvRbVni2AA

Why would the Home Office employ a woman who writes this sort of novel to do a research paper on children, which paedophiles have gleefully siezed upon as an excuse to abuse children?

Zoompad said...

I used to watch Rolf Harris as a child, and loved his show, but I remember the swimming adverts he was in, and remember feeling nauseated by them at the time.

Anonymous said...

Rolf Harris had to leave australia because of similar accusations.
The coleman experience has been exposing the sham of homosexuality
the fake website Angrifan has also been exposed again as a hard left pro homosexual website.
Today they show some photos and put twisted wording with these pics to encourage homosexuality
its digusting hateful racist and heterophobic

Zoompad said...

I don't go on Aangirfans blog any more, I thought Aangirfan was against child abuse but he/she/it posted crap about paedophiles making the best protectors of children and attacked me several times calling me "homophobic", so I think Aangirfan is a bunch of two faced trickers, even though I agree with a lot of the stuff on his/her/its blogsite.

I don't know what Aangirfans game is, but he/she/it has a different agenda to the one I thought he/she/it had, and all I want is for institutional child abuse to stop and for all the wicked ringleaders to be put into prison.

I don't necessarily want all the people who have hurt me personally to go to prison, its not revenge I'm wanting, and I know some of the people who have hurt me were acting in good faith, they dont realise who is pulling their strings, I'm particularly talking about certain people in the police and social services, drawing a distinction between people who have persecuted me and my family because they thought it was their duty, and people who have persecuted me and my family to cover up serious crimes they and their friends have committed. I think its important to seperate the two, and I would never want anyone to be punished on my account for simply doing their duty, with no malice or mischief intended.