Monday, 8 July 2013



The Most Dangerous Man in the World
and How to Stop Him
by David Wiggins

The most dangerous man alive is not the President of America or a terrorist. He is not thought of as a mass murderer, and he is not a Premier or a military dictator. The often referenced Adolf Hitler was only known to have killed one person, and that person was himself. Osama Bin Laden did not kill anyone. Stalin did not kill anyone. Pol Pot did not kill anyone. This is not to say that these were good men. They were not. They were sociopathic monsters. But they were impotent without the help of the most dangerous man alive. They were probably, of their own accord, cowards.

The most dangerous man alive killed all the Jews who died during the holocaust. He was the one who killed all the innocent civilians on both sides of World War II and all other wars. He dropped The Bomb on Hiroshima and he flew aircraft into the World Trade Centers. This man is known as The Troop.

The Troop kills. The Troop is not necessarily strong or intelligent, although he can be both. The Troop has no conscience, or if he does have one, he does not use it. The Troop believes. Facts that contradict The Troop’s beliefs are considered false by definition. The Troop has a weakness for sociopathic monsters. The Troop follows orders and has never heard an order he will not try to obey. The Troop dominates, and uses force to ensure that others cannot do as they please. The Troop works for money. The Troop finds what he does to be glorious.

The Troop is self-replicating. His actions lead to the creation of other Troops. The Troop obeys the laws of physics. For every Troop there is an equal and opposite Troop. In spite of his penchant for violence, The Troop needs lots of support. He is particularly bolstered by unconditional praise and small tokens of gratitude from anyone, including people who do not know him or anything specifically he has done. The Troop is parasitic. He lives off the sweat of taxpayers.

On some possible future night, when there is a knock on your door and a man in a uniform holds a gun to your head and demands your computer, that man will be a Troop. If someone destroys your home with a bulldozer, or your village with artillery and missiles, that someone will be a Troop. When people die in a drone strike in a far away land, a Troop pulled the trigger. When prisoners are tortured, a Troop attached the electrodes to the testicles and flipped the switch. When your freedom is gone, The Troop will be the enforcer. If you are killed for resisting, The Troop will be the killer.

Like Zombies, Troops start out as normal people. But Troops are real-life. As horrible as it may seem, your son or daughter, or your best friend might become a Troop. To prevent this from happening, it is best to get to Troops while they are still normal people. That is when they are most open to reason. One must be vigilant. Almost any normal person between the ages of 18 and 35 can become a Troop. The initial warning signs can start much earlier.

To be successful in stopping Troops, it is important to know what things can cause a normal person to become a Troop. Sociopathic monsters, who are often found in high governmental positions, need Troops to be their henchmen. For this reason, they use the resources of government to attempt to turn normal people into Troops. Government advertising makes becoming a Troop sound lucrative and adventurous and glorious. The government will claim to provide valuable training to normal people that become Troops, and also claim that becoming a Troop will give one discipline and direction.

Let your loved one know that the government propaganda they hear is, after all, produced by sociopathic monsters. Given them real-life examples such as, Waco, Texas or Tiananmen Square, or the occupied West Bank to prove your point. Point out the remarkably small percentage of high ranking politician’s children who are Troops.

A person who is looking for glory or adventure is at risk of becoming a Troop. If your child or friend is looking for glory or adventure, talk to them. Let them know that it is not glorious to be a henchman for a sociopathic monster. Offer to go on a camping trip to an underdeveloped country with them. Get flying or sailing lessons for them. Explain to them that these things can be done without the need for killing other people.

If your loved one needs discipline or direction, show them how to polish their shoes. Have them do some pushups. Have them sleep on a cot. Show them that one does not have to join the armed forces to do these things, and that with a little imagination; they might get discipline and direction by doing something entirely different like attending college or learning a trade.
Your loved one might be looking for camaraderie. Don’t be afraid to show them the love you have for them. Do things together. Demonstrate how fulfilling it is to spend time with one’s family and friends. Remind them that you love them and want them to remain close to you and safe, and not in some faraway place killing or getting killed.

Money is probably the most common reason a normal person becomes a Troop. A man has to survive and provide for his or her family by whatever means is necessary. This is where the government, with its virtually unlimited financial resources, has leverage. Talk to your loved one about self-respect and self-reliance. Assure them that as friends or family you will stick together and ensure each other’s well-being. Explain to them that someone with the motivation and the willingness to sacrifice that they have demonstrated will find a way to provide for themselves and their family, and that they won’t have to sacrifice their morals or self-respect to do it.

The task is not easy, but working together, the people of our world can cure Troopism in our lifetime. With love and perseverance we can prevail. As the number of Troops worldwide decreases, so will the incidence and extent of war. Sociopathic monsters will still exist, but they will be impotent and easily managed by traditional law enforcement. Ultimately, a world without troops would truly be a world without war. In that glorious day, together we will have stopped the most dangerous man in the world.

David Wiggins is a practicing physician, Libertarian, and anti-war advocate There is more about him here on his personal web site.


Anonymous said...

A superb article, but may i point out
that Adolf Hitler won 3 iron crosses for bravery in W W 1
a war concieved by jewish bankers for profit, remember he did not start W W 2 but reacted to the pressures of world jewry, do not belive what you see on TV or the Rupert Murdoch press, both are liars, yet the essence of what is said is right and good
thankyou for this
susan foster

Anonymous said...

well said susan foster, sometimes we forget how evil out politicians were and indeed still are, many are homosexual and involved in crimes aginst children as this courageous blog exposes for us.

Anonymous said...

My dad was one of these brainwashed men that beleived all the bankers hype
to go fight Germany in W W II
he was a pilot who firebombed the homes of German women and children night after night, he is in hospital now and awaiting death, he cries with shame over what he did and is afraid to meet his maker, i hear there are many like him, "just doing his duty"
but not to us the people but to the jewbankers.

Anonymous said...

i took out a bank loan and bought the house next door to me, and i put it through an agency to rent out, the agency said they put in some gays, they were not gay they were homosexual.
One was on the game and men would knock on doors all along the terrace at 3 -4 in the morning, then the nightmare began homosexual parties would spill out in the street right through the night, i rang the police and said two men were naked and engaged in sex over my front garden wall, they told me " homosexuality is no longer a crime madam "
My neighbours began to hate me for rentinga house to them, it was the agency not me, they paid no rent for 6 months before we could finally get them out, and they had done whats called "shitting up " they had shit everywhere rubbed it into bedding on walls even rubbed it on cielings, i had to take outa bank loan of £14,000
to clean ip up, the smell was sickening, there were pics of young boys everywhere.
homosexuals are very sick people

Anonymous said...

This rare bit of film was found on the antiwar website
warveteran, it should be compulsory viewing for all men thinking of joing up

Anonymous said...

Feel sure this link will be of interest:

Zoompad said...

Oh yes, thank you:

"Could many of those receiving a gong from Queenie be receiving a reward for their work on behalf of social engineering?

When Mick Jagger got a gong it proved to me the music industry isn’t what people are led to believe it is! In the 1960's who on earth could have imagined Jagger getting a gong and accepting it!

The youth culture of the 1960’s was, I believe, not free expression but a skilful piece of social engineering that was deliberately manipulated into the society we have today. Over the last forty years or so it is no coincidence mainstream music has become deliberately bland, fashions have become ugly and society is stressed out by constant economic pessimism. This is whilst the 1% that rule the world get richer!

Even Vivian Westwood, the woman who I believe put ugliness into fashion, received a gong. To me her designs look as if their origins are from the very sick minds of the Tavistock Centre. Creating impractical ugly fashions isn’t art, never has been, never will be!

I would not be surprised if in the near future Johnny Rotten gets a gong even though he made the record "God Save the Queen!" When punk reared its ugly head in the 1970’s I thought it seemed more to do with manipulation of the masses than music! Again, I don’t believe it was anything to do with youth rebellion it was more to do with Tavistock Centre social engineering.

What the establishment does and what it is supposed to represent is rarely what it seems. As said in previous articles, psychopaths always preach the opposite to what they do; the royal family and politicians are typical examples.

There are a few genuine recipients of Royal gongs but I question many and the overall reason for the entire arse licking ceremony. It seems more to do with Royal public relations than anything else. It is yet one more piece in the false illusionary picture that keeps people in ignorance and maintains the royal protocol. If people knew the truth, the royals would collapse like a pack of cards. Rather like our false democracy and false economy it survives by maintaining mass ignorance. We are led to believe the royals are chosen people, there because an invisible man says so.

In reality the royals are there because they go out of their way to breed psychopaths whose ruthlessness throughout the ages has murdered and stole their way to the top. It has served them well. They look upon those of us that are not psychopaths like dirt beneath them. It is blatantly obvious but people fail to see it. I believe in politeness and respect but why we should bow and curtsy to the Queen is beyond me. To me she is a person who’s a product of cousins marrying and a bloodthirsty ancestry that she should be ashamed of, not proud of!

Zoompad said...

The royals also have all the psychopath traits such as being seen to support major charities so as to give them a “caring” image. Psychopaths thrive on self-gratification, regardless of the consequences, and the constant need to boost their own ego. Above all they thrive on nervous tension and/or suffering of others, it gives them a high. This is how they can accumulate vast wealth whilst seeing suffering in the world and not spending a penny to help. They get other people to spend their money, via their phoney charity support, but they never put their hands in their own rich pockets! Ive written many articles about the royals and psychopaths on:

Having several secret sex partners whilst married is common in Royal circles. Psychopaths are also closely linked to homosexuals. Little wonder the royal household is full of them. The Queen Mother surrounded herself with homosexual servants. Prime minister Ted Heath was said to be homosexual. There is evidence that Churchill was bi-sexual. Allegedly Tony Blair is bi-sexual. Apparently in the 1970’s and early 1980’s Blair was caught in a public toilet with another man carrying out an indecent act. When charged at Bow Street Police station in London, he gave his middle name, Lynton. Many Prime Ministers and Government ministers, throughout the years, have been involved in a range of sex and/or fraud scandals, many of which have been suppressed. Such people are selected for high office as the banks that control them can easily blackmail them.

The mystique and the Royal stage-managed protocol that surrounds them is designed to demean the public whilst metaphorically placing the royal on a pedestal. We are led to believe they are a family to aspire to, but in reality they are anything but! To me they are a freak show!

Even the way the Royals’ talk is designed to demean the average individual. It’s all an illusion and will continue to be whilst we have a controlled media that’s owned by a super rich minority and a controlled government that’s owned by the banks.

I always laugh when people go to the palace to receive their gongs. They are dressed in their penguin suits and interviewed outside. They always say the same, how marvelous the Queen is. They are hardly going to say she is a miserable old bag that’s got bad breath, is on an ego trip and stinks of stale piss are they!

Zoompad said...


"The youth culture of the 1960’s was, I believe, not free expression but a skilful piece of social engineering that was deliberately manipulated into the society we have today. Over the last forty years or so it is no coincidence mainstream music has become deliberately bland, fashions have become ugly and society is stressed out by constant economic pessimism. This is whilst the 1% that rule the world get richer!"

I never liked the "free love" movement, because we human beings are more like swans than bees. If you go flitting from partner to partner you break peoples hearts. I thought the "free love" movement promoted selfishness. I think all that stuff was satanic.

I don't know about the Royal family though, the thing I would criticise the Queen for is signing things she didn't understand, its not her fault she was born into the Royal family or that she has bad breath!

Zoompad said...

But also, you shouldn't let anyone worship you and put you on a big pedestal, and the Queen has let them do that to her. She should have laid her crown at the feet of the King of Kings, she ought to have remembered that her crown is only by proxy, all the kings and queens and rulers only have their authority by Gods hand, because we are all mortal beings.

Living is a huge mansion or many mansions while there are so many beggers living so very close by is dangerous, because other people can see the contrast. I dont suppose the Queen has anything to do with the abuse of little children, but the ones who are lifting her up use her as their talisman, just like they do with the Gay Rights legislation, to cover up child abuse.

I actually feel very sorry for the Queen, I don't think she really understands what those people really are. Theres a saying, flattery can get you everywhere, I think her satellites understand that very well. We should pray for the Queen I think.

Zoompad said...

"We are led to believe the royals are chosen people, there because an invisible man says so. "

The Israelites were warned by God about wanting a king to rule over them in 1 Samuel 8:

2. (4-5) Samuel’s sons are rejected as leaders over Israel.

Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah, and said to him, “Look, you are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now make us a king to judge us like all the nations.”

a. All the elders of Israel gathered: This was wise for the elders of Israel to do this. They did not have to accept leaders who were obviously ungodly and unfit to lead.

b. While it is was wise for the elders of Israel to reject Samuel’s sons as leaders, it was wrong for them to say, “Now make for us a king to judge us like all the nations.”

i. In and of itself, the desire to have a king was not bad. God knew that one day Israel would have a king. Four hundred years before this, God gave instructions to Israel about their future king (Deuteronomy 17:14-20). A king was in God’s plan for Israel.

ii. Yet, the reason Israel wanted a king was wrong. Like all the nations is no reason at all. We often get into trouble by wanting to be like the world, when we should instead be transformed into the image of Jesus Christ (Romans 12:1-2). The church struggles with the same issue today, too often wanting to be like the world.

iii. We may also get into trouble when we want the right things for the wrong reasons. In those situations, God may give us what we want, and then deal with us regarding the reasons.