Friday, 7 June 2013


I have been complaining for years about the Military Secret Services persecuting victims of institutional child abuse (Pindown)

I know Pindown is the specific term used in the Staffordshire child abuse, but it was a method of containing State "looked after" children, ie the children obtained by the State with court orders. I know not all the children taken away from their parents in this way were abused by the people who were paid by the Government to look after them, but many were, and those that were have been persecuted and hounded for decades, deliberatly criminalised for poverty crimes, prevented from having their day in court with their abusers, given inappropriate and even downright dangerous medical and psychiatric treatment, stalked by the Secret Services and put onto blacklists of "troublemakers" and "potential terrorists", had their own children falsely labelled as at risk so that they can be stolen by the State as well, been shut out of the justice system by being put onto police blacklists as "time wasters", ect ect ect.

My social networking has been hacked, I know that for an absolute fact, because the hackers even boasted openly about hacking me, and how easy it was, and how untouchable and above the law they were. But when I went to the police about it I was pretty much told to fuck off and stop whining. I've shown the police damning evidence that the Military Secret Services are involved in child trafficking, but do they want to do anything about it? NO THEY DO NOT!

I'm not the only one who has been treated in this shitty way either.

So I rest my case.


Zoompad said...

The paedophile gangsters have been very crafty, because they have wangled themselves into key positions.

Paedophiles absolutly love secrecy, they are like fungus, thats the best way to describe them actually, like dank spreading dark loving fungus, they thrive wherever their is secrecy and darkness.

If there are any genuine decent and honest people in the Military Secret Services, they should be asking this question - why the heck would anyone spend large amounts of money to spy and harass victims and whistleblowers of institutional child abuse? Are we child abuse victims some sort of military secret that justifies large amounts of cash being spent on hassling us?

Zoompad said...

And I keep banging on about wanting an apology. I want an apology, because without it I can't "get over it"!

How on earth can I "get over it", when I am continuously having to look over my shoulder for the next attack? All the blasted brainwashing "therapy" in the universe is not going to make me "get over it" until I get that long awaited and long desired apology, that will let me know at long last that the attacks are going to stop.

I want an apology. If I don't get one in my lifetime the stink of what I have been through will never go away. If I do get an apology, it won't just bless me, it will also bless the people who have hounded me!

Who is going to be brave and decent enough to step up to the mark with the white flag? Who will look this brave but battered woman in the eye and give her a heartfelt apology for all this shit up?

Anon said...

Evil defeats itself.


Anonymous said...

perversion is now mainstream, its no longer an offence and those like jimmy savile who were protected by the israel lobby are untouchable

Zoompad said...

"Evil defeats itself."

I know


I can't!

Zoompad said...

"who were protected by the israel lobby are untouchable"

They THINK they are untouchable, but they're forgetting that they are only mortal human beings after all, and God is watching.

Zoompad said...

By Christopher Hope, Senior Political Correspondent
6:00AM BST 20 Apr 2013
A survey using Freedom Of Information laws found that 25 police forces made 506,720 requests for people’s “communications data” over the past three years.

There were big disparities between force areas, with people in Merseyside are six times more likely to be spied on than those in neighbouring Lancashire.

A breakdown shows that the number of requests for phone or email records - but not the content of calls or emails - increased from 158,677 in 2009/10 to 178,985 in 2011/12.

Including estimates for the forces which failed to reply to the FOI survey, the figures suggest that as many as 250,000 requests are being made every year.

Campaigners Big Brother Watch, which carried the survey, said the evidence suggested the police and other agencies do not need more “snooping powers”.

A newly drafted Communications Bill is due to be published in the summer, which is likely to propose more powers to spy on people.

Emma Carr, deputy director of Big Brother Watch, urged ministers to order a “comprehensive investigation of how current powers are operating” before bringing in new ones later this year.

She said: “The research makes clear that between police forces there are significant inconsistencies in the way that communications data is being used.

“It emphasises how it impossible to form a measured view of how the current system is operating given the huge discrepancies in the way forces are recording how they use communications data.”

Merseyside made 36 requests for every 1,000 residents living in the county – compared with the Metropolitan Police, which put in 21 requests, Lancashire (6 requests) and Hampshire (0.8 requests).

David Davis MP, the former Tory shadow home secretary who quit the front bench in protest over the Labour government’s treatment of civil liberties, said: “It is frankly not good enough that the government is considering introducing a snoopers' charter without even being able to tell us what they have used communications data for in the past – and indeed not even be able to tell us how many times they have done so.

“The Government should come clean with parliament and tell us exactly how the powers they currently have been used in the past, and tell us for example, whether they have been using it across the country for traffic offences.”

A Home Office spokesman said: "This legislation is vital to help catch paedophiles, terrorists and other serious criminals. Communications data includes time, duration and dialling numbers of a phone call, or an email address. It does not include the content of any phone call or email.

“The cross-party Joint Committee which scrutinised the Bill reported that it was impressed with the thoroughness with which each and every application for communications data is considered.

“The police and other requesting authorities are subject to rigorous independent inspections by the Interception of Communications Commissioner (IoCC). The IoCC also publishes annual statistics on communications data requests and releases.”

Zoompad said...

"A Home Office spokesman said: "This legislation is vital to help catch paedophiles, terrorists and other serious criminals. "


I have personally shown every MP in Parliament evidence of a paedophile ring operating through the Secret Family Courts in many countries, including the UK, and not a single one of them has done a single thing about it!

If this snooping really was being used to catch paedos I would be the last person to complain about it, but it isn't being used on the paedos, its being used on whistleblowers and victims of paedos, to find anything they can drag them into court for, like they did to Senator Stuart Syvret, and that is the truth!!!!!

Zoompad said...

And like they did to me during 7 years of absolute hell on earth of persecution in the Secret Family Courts, being falsely accused of PAS, a syndrome that an American paedophile quack self made psychologist called Richard Gardner had invented to cover up for paedophile gangsters!

Zoompad said...


Until I get that long awaited apology, how the blinking blasted hell can I?

Zoompad said...

A British Defense Ministry press advisory committee, reacting to a flurry of revelations in the American press about massive warrantless US government electronic surveillance programs, quietly warned UK organizations Friday not to publish British national security information.

Defiance of the advisory could make British journalists vulnerable to prosecution under the Official Secrets Act.

The June 7 "DA-Notice," or Defence Advisory Notice, which was itself confidential, accepted that the U.S. National Security Agency was sharing information gleaned from the surveillance programs with its British counterparts, and said UK intelligence organizations were worried about revelations of their own roles in the programs.

"There have been a number of articles recently in connection with some of the ways in which the UK Intelligence Services obtain information from foreign sources," said the notice issued by the Defence Advisory Committee, a joint body with media organizations.

"Although none of these recent articles has contravened any of the guidelines contained within the Defence Advisory Notice System, the intelligence services are concerned that further developments of this same theme may begin to jeopardize both national security and possibly UK personnel," it said.

The notice itself was marked "Private and Confidential: Not for publication, broadcast or use on social media."

It warned British media not to publish information on "specific covert operations, sources and methods of the security services, SIS and GCHQ [the NSA's British counterpart], Defence Intelligence Units, Special Forces and those involved with them, the application of those methods, including the interception of communications and their targets; the same applies to those engaged on counter-terrorist operations."

British news organizations are concerned about the tenor of the advance warning.

"They're sending out a notice saying nothing'

Warning follows exposé of UK cooperation in massive warrantless US government electronic spying
s been published that damages national security but we're concerned the press might (and on the back of developments in the US, no less)," said a media source.

The worry is that British authorities may be preparing to pursue reporters through the courts if they publish details on UK participation in the massive US electronic surveillance programs, code-named "PRISM" and "BLARNEY," according to a report in The Washington Post.

The NSA collects "directly from the servers of these U.S. Service Providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple," the Post reported.

According to the Guardian newspaper, the NSA has been sharing intelligence from the same internet companies with GCHQ.

President Obama on Friday defended the spying programs, which access every Americans' email and Internet searches, saying "a whole bunch of safeguards [are] involved" to protect privacy.

Anonymous said...

some very good stuff on the site just now barbara, and some good comments too.
when just 2% of the population are homosexual why should the other 98%
have to give way, we dont want perversion thrust on our kids.
Paul Chadd of the handicapped aliance said they are being hounded to find non existant jobs, and several who had their money stopped have committed suicide, the handicapped area far bigger percentage than homosexuals yet they just get harassment

Zoompad said...

Paul Chadd is absolutly right, the disabled are the ones who are being bullied, not gay people.

The Paedogangsters who have shielded themselves with a disguise of Gay Rights campaigners have been really crafty (obviously something they have learned from Satan their father!)because they made a big thing in the 60s and 70s of being persecuted - I remember that programme The Naked Civil Servant very well. Actually, they weren't really being persecuted at all, unless you call being thumped for making lewd suggestions to straight men counts as persecution, which personally I dont think it does, but they fooled most people, including me with their Poor Old Me propaganda crap. I used to feel really sorry for gay people because of that, but now all my sympathy has gone, I only feel sorry for real victims of real abuse these days.

Anonymous said...

It is becuase you are on the right track and will not be side tracked .

Keep it up you are doing good work.

-Paedophile activist – Nigel Oldfield

Anonymous said...

I'll tell you and interesting story. Many years ago, nearly 50 years ago, in fact, I read a story in a pulp magazine about a man who goes into a bar, and sees a woman. He is attracted to her and starts dancing with her. A crowd slowly gathers around them and is reviled by what they see -- a disgusting display of heterosexual attraction! You see, the story is set in the future, and in the future, homosexuality has become the norm, with birth controlled by the government via test tube babies, and the population is brought up thinking that being homosexal IS the norm.

The people are on this path because the NGOs which suck off the government teat are founded and funded by those perverse forces we both know so well who want to destroy the family, the home, the environment, and the nation state. They see homosexuality and the sexual use of youg boys as the greatest wedge issue, because the promotion of it destroys all traditional values of husband & wife, male and female, man & woman, etc. How very very sick
Amanda Ferguson

Zoompad said...

PRO-Paedophile activist – Nigel Oldfield

Nigel Oldfield
I have been in contact with this sick twisted man many times. Also chris wittwer Once on a radio show, and many times he has contacted me via facebook. He is a very dangerous and deluded man, who is hated even by other paedophiles for his rants on many sex offender forums ! Well Nigel, here is your limelight you so obviously crave !

WM, AKA Nigel Leigh Oldfield, AKA webmanager-critest, AKA Jack Barot, AKA JackBarotBass, is a pedophile who is a member of GirlChat. “Dr.” Oldfield, however, is not just a paedophile. He also gets his jollies from harassing victims of past sexual abuse, and bullying children into revealing their identities online. See The “Fayla” Incident. He spent 7 months in jail, and is still on probation for possessing and manufacturing child pornography.

In the past, Oldfield has been returned to jail for stalking a victim, and his website has tomes of documents recording the process, and his indignant response all the way through. However, that didn’t stop this man. He has very recently harassed a sexual abuse survivor on her blogs, asking her if she was sure if she was abused, and whether or not she enjoyed the abuse. Oldfield serves as yet another good example of a paedophile activist who’s obviously a threat to other people, children and adults alike.

On GirlChat, he tries to portray himself as an expert on a wide variety of topics, but even his fellow paedophiles view him with disdain and contempt. His website, instead of being the scholarly repository of intellectual material he seems to think it is, is a tabloid style, narcissistic representation of what a crazed individual this man really is.

Former Employment:
Chemistry teacher at Buxton Community School, Buxton Derbyshire

August 2005 – Shamed tutor is paedophile ‘agony uncle’

A TWISTED teacher jailed for downloading 11,000 vile images of children is masterminding a website for paedophiles from behind bars. Disgraced chemistry tutor Nigel Oldfield, 44, plays “agony uncle” to perverts who log on to the site, which justifies paedophile activities and demands sex with children be made legal. The site also advises paedophiles on how to download child porn without being caught.

Zoompad said...

Oldfield uses the telephone and the post to direct his online sex offenders’ network. One rant on the website’s message board states: “Everyone will have sex with anyone unless they restrict themselves – so everyone is a bisexual paedophile. The common sense position is that it is biologically normal that adolescents are sexually attractive.” In response to a music teacher being jailed for downloading 38,000 child porn images, another posting says: “This man has harmed no-one, and is being forced to pretend that he hates his sexuality.

“I’m in a similar situation, having been twice convicted of possession of child pictures. I’ve just finished a sex offenders’ course. Two-and-a-half hours of mind-numbing tedium each week was the real punishment.” The site also provides “model answers” to those caught downloading child porn to help them escape prosecution and offers technical explanations so paedophiles can claim they viewed images by mistake.

Oldfield was arrested in August 2002 after a shopper saw him taking pictures of children in Sheffield’s Meadowhall shopping centre. Police then discovered child porn images on computers at his flat in Doncaster. He set up the website, which the Mirror has chosen not to name, while out on licence after serving eight months for possessing child porn. The site was axed in May by internet service providers after a police probe and Oldfield’s probation team ordered he return to prison. But now he has managed to restart it and Oldfield is in contact with fellow perverts on the running of the website, which offers a mobile number and an email address to offer one-to-one “support”.

Victims’ charity Phoenix Survivors is now joining British police and the FBI in a bid to shut down the site. Phoenix chief executive, Shy Keenan, said: “Oldfield has somehow managed to get this up and running right under the noses of prison guards. “He’s made contact with his cronies for the day-to-day running of the site, while he is still on hand to offer his sick form of ‘advice’.

“The worry is site users have their warped opinions reinforced by other paedophiles and go on to abuse. It makes their behaviour seem normal and seeks to justify their actions. “It also helps them cover their tracks, making their crimes even harder to detect.” The original site was shut down by US service provider iPowerweb when it learned of the nature of the site. The site’s latest version went online last week but the new American internet provider was unavailable for comment.

Police have vowed to monitor the website. The latest web scandal comes as the Home Office consults on plans to outlaw the downloading of violent and abusive images.

Below is a link for the radio interview for which chris wittwer was in where Oldfield tried to jutify Paedophilia

Zoompad said...

"He has very recently harassed a sexual abuse survivor on her blogs, asking her if she was sure if she was abused, and whether or not she enjoyed the abuse. "


Zoompad said...

The paedos crowed about how they overturned Operation Ore convictions in The Appalling Visa by Brian Rothery, you can read it for free by following this link:

Rothery mentions Haut de la Garenne in that book, and calls the victims of the abuse compensation gold diggers. Chris Wittwer is also mentioned, and I kept telling Chris to read what Rothery was saying about him.

Rothery has written another book, which I have read the first two chapters of, I haven't read any more of his crap because I don't really need to, just by reading that much its pretty obvious what sort of a creature he is. But I think all victims of Pindown institutional child abuse and whistleblowers and the police (good proper police I mean, not scum bags like the wotsit that is in charge of Stafford Police right now) because the evidence to arrest those paedophile gangsters is all in that book!

I begged Chris Wittwer not to give up running his anti paedo site himself, because I was scared the paedos would take it over, as they did to MFJ, and smash up the good work he had done.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I found the chamber I was abused in, I told people, no one listens even though I could take you there, they have evidence but no arrests are made,

Zoompad said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Zoompad said...

I didn't realise that the JAWF had closed down, I stopped going on it because it was making me ill, getting attacked by them all the time, getting ganged up on and attacked for telling the truth.

Zoompad said...

Getting back to what PRISM has been up to:

"The NSA collects "directly from the servers of these U.S. Service Providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple," the Post reported.

According to the Guardian newspaper, the NSA has been sharing intelligence from the same internet companies with GCHQ. "

I have had problems with YouTube, because the moderators appear to be pro paedophilia on YouTube. I got a 6 month sanction for complaining too vigourously about a disgusting video posted on YouTube. There appears to be no redress for genuine victims of abuse and bullying to turn to on YouTube. I've had the paedos who took over by stealth Mothers For Justice follow me onto YouTube to bully me, and though I reported it to moderators and to the police many times, nothing was done.

Zoompad said...

I had a couple of death threats on Facebook, and one on this blog as well, nothing was done, nowhere to turn to.

Stafford Police were vile to me when I reported the blog death threat, I was frog marched to Mental Health Services.

Zoompad said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Zoompad said...

"People won't stand up and speak out"

There are lots of people who have, but they end up getting persecuted and even murdered. People are terrified, and you can't really blame them for that. God help us all!

Zoompad said...

I am also terrified, how can I not be, its very very very very very frightening what they have done to me.

I feel like that woman in The King And I, trying to put on a happy face whilst my heart is filled with fear. That is my daily way of life and has been for a long time.

I wont blame other people for being so frightened, as I feel frightened myself as well. Stafford Police warned me to stop blogging, its really frightening that they have done that, when they know damned well I am a victim of crime, yet people like Nigel Oldfield can even run a paedo website in jail because of his Human Rights! How sick and twisted is that?

Anonymous said...

I'm at present trying to fight against a paedophile gang in paltalk who are pretending to be Christian ministers who buy their certificates online and they are doing it commit fraud by avoiding paying tax. They are also involved in gathering porn video's from women who they are trying to blackmail into silence so they get away with their paedophile group online. I was approached by this group of people myself and they tried to get naked photo's and video's online. I was also sent a full frontal video of a fake minister hoping I would do the same. They are also involved in trying to get child images by using a security pass that hides their paedophile images behind photo's, yes I can prove this as I've saved every text message and chat and also Skype text from that group of people. There are a few convicted paedophiles within that group and its also international too so no country is immune to this. I will name names if I need to and the police also have copies of everything I have as I made sure of it. There is nothing worse than child abuse and they picked on the wrong woman to mess with lol. I don't play their games and I'm willing to be a witness in court against them all.