Thursday 17 July 2014

WHY DID STEPHEN FRY GIVE DODGY AWARDS TO DODGY PEOPLE AT STAFFORD POLICE?

BEARING IN MIND THAT STAFFORD POLICE HAVE COVERED UP PINDOWN INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE AND SECRET FAMILY COURT LEGAL ABUSE AND FORCED ADOPTIONS AND THE USE OF SYNDROMES THAT WERE INVENTED BY AMERICAN PAEDOPHILES IN SECRET COURTS IN STAFFORDSHIRE, AND THE TAKING OF DISABLED CHILDREN TO DRAKE HALL PRISON FOR PE LESSONS WITHOUT OBTAINING PARENTAL CONSENT OR EVEN INFORMING PARENTS WHERE THEIR CHILDREN WERE BEING TAKEN!

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.polfed.org%2Fdocuments%2FBiogs_for_ICC_conference_2014.pdf&ei=dYXHU_iKPIHe7AbCooGwAg&usg=AFQjCNFj2Ddu6gT3glgbiUrihg5fguWH4w&sig2=ICB-g1AvNfvaRfrtphPJDA&bvm=bv.71198958,d.ZWU

INSPECTORS’ CENTRAL COMMITTEE – PFEW CONFERENCE MAY 2014
Chief Constable Michael Cunningham
Mike was appointed as Chief Constable of Staffordshire Police on 14 September, 2009. He is a passionate and committed advocate of integrated partnership working and collaboration. Under his leadership and guidance, Staffordshire partners have developed a fully joined-up approach to safeguarding vulnerable adults and children. Nationally he has led the service during a period of significant focus and scrutiny in his role as lead for Professional Standards. More recently he has taken the lead for the National Policing Workforce Development Business Area.
Mike’s achievements within the police service have been recognised at the highest level, and he was awarded a Queens Police Medal in the New Year’s Honours list for 2013. Prior to joining the Police, he graduated from the University of Durham with a degree in Theology in 1984 and became a teacher.
His police career began when he joined Lancashire Constabulary in 1987. He was operational across the constabulary area in a number of different ranks and became Blackpool’s Divisional Commander in 2002.
Having successfully completed the Strategic Command Course in Bramshill Police College in November 2005, he returned to Lancashire Constabulary as Assistant Chief Constable taking responsibility for operational policing across Lancashire. He was appointed Deputy Chief Constable in August 2007.
He has a wide range of experience in operational policing, having been responsible for six territorial divisions and developing neighbourhood policing in Lancashire. His portfolio also included specialist operations, the investigation of serious and organised crime, and counter-terrorism. During his service with Lancashire Constabulary, he was known for his strong commitment to diversity as evidenced by his determination to take on the role of ACPO Lead for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) issues. Professor Peter Turnbull
Peter Turnbull is Professor of Human Resource Management & Labour Relations at Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University. He previously held posts at the Universities of Leeds, Warwick and London School of Economics, and visiting posts at the Universities of Queen’s (Belfast), La Trobe, Melbourne, Monash, Sydney, Auckland (UT) and Washington (Seattle). In 2011, he was Visiting Academic Fellow at the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in Geneva.
Professor Turnbull is the co-author (with Dr Victoria Wass) of Time for Justice: Long Working Hours and the Well-Being of Police Inspectors and recently completed a joint project with the ICC, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), on “Working Time and Wellbeing in the Police Service: Practical Steps to Monitor, Manage and Balance the Working Hours/Lives of Police Inspectors” (ES/K005618/1, with Dr Victoria Wass). He is the author/editor of several books including The Dynamics of Employee Relations (Palgrave), Reassessing Human Resource Management (Sage) and Reassessing the Employment Relationship (Palgrave) as well as more than fifty academic papers and numerous reports for national and international organisations and agencies. Professor Turnbull is an Academic Fellow of the CIPD and a member of the ACAS Arbitration Panel.
PCC Gwent, Ian Johnston QPM
Ian Johnston served as a police officer for 33 years in Gwent. He served as Head of CID in Gwent for 4 years and was the Senior Investigating Officer on many high profile cases.
He then took up a national role with the Police Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales serving as President of the organisation from 2007-2010. Having retired as a Superintendent, Ian successfully stood as an independent candidate in the 2012 PCC elections and now represents the policing needs for the population of Gwent.
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Tom Winsor
In October 2012, Mr Winsor was appointed as Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary. He is the first holder of that office to come from a non-policing background. Mr Winsor graduated from the University of Edinburgh in 1979 and is a lawyer admitted to practise in both Scotland and England and Wales. In private practice, he specialised in complex commercial projects, finance, public law and the design and operation of economic and safety regulatory systems for essential public services such as energy, water and transport. He was a partner in major commercial law firms in the City of London. Between 1999 and 2004, Mr Winsor was the Rail Regulator and International Rail Regulator, the economic regulatory authority for the railways in Great Britain.
Between October 2010 and March 2012, Mr Winsor carried out a review of the pay and conditions of service of police officers and police staff in England and Wales. The review was carried out at the request of the Home Secretary and was the most comprehensive for more than 30 years. It recommended the replacement of pay scales based on time service with a system of pay advancement according to skills and contribution, direct entry to the police at senior ranks, fitness testing and the replacement of the statutory apparatus for the determination of police pay. Legislation to implement a significant proportion of Mr Winsor’s recommendations was passed in March 2014.
Inspector Michael Brown
Michael has had a severe and enduring interest in policing and mental health – ever since he realised that he didn’t know what he was doing in this area of work. He has been a police officer for sixteen years, mainly front-line operational roles in Birmingham, but he spent three years working full-time on mental health projects for West Midlands Police, ACPO and the former NPIA.
He was instrumental in setting up six “s136 Place of Safety” services, including one in Birmingham specifically for children, and these were highlighted in 2010 by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and the Care Quality Commission, as national best practice. This has reduced the number of people being taken to police cells by 97% for which he was commended by his Chief Constable in 2012. Michael started writing the “MentalHealthCop” blog in 2011 – a series of articles and legislative summaries exploring the venn diagram of policing, mental health and criminal justice. For this, Stephen Fry presented him with the Mark Hanson Digital Media Award from mental health charity Mind in 2012. He lectures on the MSc in Forensic Mental Health degree at the University of Birmingham and on undergraduate training for paramedics and mental health nurses.

16 comments:

Zoompad said...

AND NOW IT BECOMES VERY CLEAR TO ME WHY I WAS TREATED IN SUCH A STRANGE WAY A FEW YEARS AGO WHEN I REPORTED A DEATH THREAT I RECIEVED TO STAFFORD POLICE.

I WAS BULLIED BY THE WPC WHO CAME TO INVESTIGATE, AND TOLD TO STOP BLOGGING. I WAS TOLD BY HER THAT I WAS A "MENTALLY ILL ATTENTION SEEKER"

NOW I CAN SEE WHY THEY WANTED ME TO STOP BLOGGING, THEY WERE FRIGHTENED OF WHAT I MIGHT FIND OUT AND BLOG ABOUT!

Zoompad said...

ALSO DAWN FRANKS FUNNY LITTLE TRICK WITH FAINTLY SPIDERY WRITING PENCILLED IN STATEMENT IN HER POLICE NOTEBOOK THAT SHE TRIED TO GET ME TO SIGN, IN BIRO

I MADE MY OWN STATEMENT INSTEAD, IN BIRO, SO IT COULDN'T BE RUBBED OUT, AND SIGNED UNDERNEATH THAT, TAKING CARE TO LEAVE NO SPACE, IN BIRO.

THE TRICKS THEY'VE TRIED TO PULL ONE ME, WHY DIDNT THEY JUST APOLOGISE AND TRY TO PUT THINGS RIGHT INSTEAD?

Zoompad said...

THEY COULD HAVE PUT THINGS RIGHT SO EASILY FOR ME, ITS DAFT WHAT THEY'VE DONE, ALL I WANTED WAS APOLOGY AND GOOD TREATMENT, INSTEAD THEY GANGED UP ON ME, GOT MI5 TO STALK ME, HACKED MY SOCIAL NETWORKING, I JUST WANTED MY LIFE, THEY STOPPED ME HAVING THAT, THEY'VE FORCED ME TO INVESTIGATE THEM, INSTEAD OF BEING ABLE TO JUST GET ON WITH MY LIFE AND BEING HAPPY!

Zoompad said...










































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Pageviews by Countries








Entry

Pageviews









United States



17





United Kingdom



15





Germany



7





Russia



5





Canada



2





Indonesia



2





Monaco



2





France



1





Ireland



1





Jersey



1

Zoompad said...

Monaco. I bet I know who that is!

Zoompad said...

15 from UK, bet Stafford Police are having a get together now, word of advice, no more funny tricks, I can smell them a mile off.

Why don't you just try apologising and putting things right? I'd rather be spending my life enjoying the sunshine than doing this!

Zoompad said...

Someone from Morocco was looking at this post yesterday as well.

I am pretty sure I know who that person is.

Zoompad said...


UK ex-Minister supported 'Paedo' child fostering application as sex abuse inquiry engulfs Westministers bubble
Tuesday 15th July 2014
● Crime WorldBy Donal MacIntyre
0


13






Westminster sex abuse scandal to be bigger than 'Watergate' as victims take centre stage in new inquiry.



A former UK Minister, recommended that a convicted paedophile be allowed to foster children, the Sunday World has learned, as the child sex abuse scandal gets closer to the seat of Power at Westminster.



The high profile ex-minister recommended that a convicted paedophile be allowed to foster two children and voiced objections when a London Borough refused him permission.

The ex-Minister is now a suspect in separate child abuse investigations and is believed to have been interviewed by London Detectives, investigating historical child sex abuse allegations in the 70’s and 80’s but his name has not been released by the London Metropolitan Police.

In a saga reminicent of Rolf Harris, when he was arrested on abuse charges but his name was not released for several months, the release of this ex-minister’s name will shock the political establishment in the UK to the core.

“The UK is fast facing its Belgium moment”, one Met insider said, referring to the links between Paedophile rings and political circles which has scandalized that country for nearly two decades.

The sheer number of child victims and the suspected involvement of senior government ministers over the decades in the abuse means that it could even dwarf ‘Watergate’ in terms of modern political scandals.

It is understood that an investigation involving the ex-minister was mothballed over 15 years ago and the Police officer leading the case, was sidelined and then disciplined as a result of his inquiries.

The file in relation to that case has now disappeared but new victims are coming forward all the time and the weight of public opinion after the convictions of Rolf Harris and Jimmy Savile mean that powerful paedophile do not have the protection they once had.

Many of the officers who were involved at a senior level in those original investigations are now senior officers in other UK forces and will be called to account over their previous failures to investigate the allegations.

The fallout from this new investigation and growing row, took on its first scalp as Baroness Butler-Sloss who was due to commence an inquiry into these wider allegations resigned because of links to her late brother who was Attorney General and who himself had come under attack for an alleged cover up of sexual abuse crimes in high society, as a member of the Thatcher Government

The resignations come after a former conservative party figure says that he gave Margaret Thatcher a dossier about senior ministers’ involvement in a child sex ring.

Anthony Giberthorpe, said that he supplied boys to drug fuelled parties for politicians as a young Tory hopeful but others have discredited his claims.

The allegations are mounting and the reverberations around the Westminster Village are making some very senior civil servants and political figures, very nervous indeed.

Zoompad said...

Unanswered Questions: Comment by Liz Davies on why she wants a national inquiry

Following his presentation to the Home Office of two dossiers about sexual crimes against children, Geoffrey Dickens raised concerns about ‘child brothels’ being run on an Islington Council Estate. In 1986, he spoke of tenants providing him with tape recordings of children screaming during ‘sex sessions’ and mentioned 40 child victims some as young as 6. He also identified three premises and reported matters to Scotland Yard and Douglas Hurd the Home Secretary. These allegations were denied at the time by the Director of Social Services. Yet, in the very area where Dickens was highlighting his concerns, the decomposed body of a girl of 17 was found in a cupboard in a block of council flats. She was said to have been strangled during oral sex after being at a ‘sex party’. This was in 1988 when, as a social work manager in the area, I was hearing rumours of children in the care system being murdered. I remembered the girl’s name being whispered and made a note but have only recently acquired the press cuttings about her going missing and then being found murdered. I do not know if Vivian Loki was in the Islington care system because no-one is interested in finding out. I have reported this case repeatedly to various authorities since the early 90s.

Another whisper, also scribbled in my hand written notes at the time, was of a thirteen year old boy Anthony McGrane (I had recorded his name as McGrath and his age as 9 years – perhaps this was another child – I do not know). Anthony was found dead in a garage. This time the press cuttings said that he had been a resident in Conewood Street Assessment Centre. If this was true then this was the same children’s home where residential workers had told me that Jason Swift had lived shortly before he was murdered by Sidney Cooke and his gang. At the time of the Islington Inquiries in the 90s, Jason’s residence in an Islington home was also denied by the senior Islington manager. Anthony died of multiple stab wounds. My notes stated a different garage location from the one in the newspapers. Perhaps my information was flawed. Police at the time said that his death may have been linked to 16 other child killings. In both these cases men were convicted of manslaughter and each served 6 years imprisonment.

Zoompad said...

In the early 90s, when I exposed the extensive abuse of Islington children in the care system, I began to hear accounts of other child murders. Managers, who must have known of these previous cases, accused me of being obsessional and hysterical and tried to stop my investigations. I have recently learnt that orders came from a senior police officer to close the investigations down. I do not know if anyone has a current interest in knowing who that officer was and of course by now he may not even be alive. The social work manager who told me to forget my work with police at that time needs to be called to account with many others who continued to work within the profession and were never asked to explain their absolute disregard for the safety of children. At the time of the Islington Inquiries some staff left the country returning in later years to resume their careers.

In the absence of police investigation, I have continued to raise my concerns through the twenty-plus years but there has never been a national overview of the connections that went way beyond Islington borders. I have no doubt that children were marketed for sexual exploitation to children’s homes all over the country and I have long argued for a national police and social work investigation team. However, instead of improving child protection systems they have been steadily eroded. Joint police and social work child protection teams have long been closed down and in 2013, revised statutory guidance, Working Together to Safeguard Children, completely eliminated the definition of organised abuse and the means of investigating it. I was horrified. Who exactly was responsible for this policy change?

This is why I want a National Inquiry into organised child abuse. I have struggled to get such cases investigated for many years and got nowhere. I want to know the reason for that. I want to know who was responsible for shredding my files on 61 child victims which were unavailable to the Inquiries. I want to know why so many of the Islington staff who supported the abusers and colluded in the cover ups went on to senior social work posts. I do not know who the 32 social services staff were that, following the Inquiry, were not allowed to work with children but I have certainly located two members of staff who tried to protect children, found their names on the list and were unable to continue their careers. I want to know how such an injustice could happen to good people and no-one be brought to task over it. Only recently I obtained a report of an Inquiry to which I had presented evidence. Nothing of my 4 hour contribution featured in it. The authors of that Inquiry need to be called to account.

Those MPs who have not signed up to the need for a National Inquiry are under scrutiny. Margaret Hodge, former labour lead in Islington who did not believe my reports of abuse networks has not so far stated her position. In her defence, she often said that she was misled by her senior officers. I want to know if, when she realised she had been misinformed, she reported these so called professionals to the relevant regulatory bodies and to police. I want answers. I have waited a long time. Now, through social media, adult survivors are coming forward adding to my knowledge of what happened in the Islington care homes. They also want answers . Most of them have waited far longer than me.

Dr Liz Davies

Reader in Child Protection
London Metropolitan University

l.davies@londonmet.ac.uk
02.07.2014

Zoompad said...






'I love my adopted daughter but should never have been matched with her'

Single parent Hannah White, whose daughter has cerebral palsy, says social workers should have known better

• Parents and social workers need more support with adoption
Share263





inShare.7
Email



Louise Tickle


Guardian Professional, Tuesday 1 July 2014 08.55 BST




'How any social worker could think that a single, full-time working person could be the right person to adopt a child with complex needs, it’s just beyond me.' Photograph: David Bigwood/Alamy


Single parent Hannah White, 46, adopted her daughter four years ago. Alice, aged seven, has cerebral palsy.


"It took me less than a year to get approved, but then I waited around two-and-a-half years to be matched. In that time three other children were identified as possibles, but they didn't proceed. You invest so much hope in each potential adoption, and with each failed matching I felt more and more anguished. Was there something wrong with me? It started to feel like there must be. And then my social worker said she was worried I was getting too upset, so they put me on hold for six months. There was absolutely nothing I could do about that decision, and emotionally, it made the situation far worse.


As a prospective single parent adopter, I only had a couple of friends to support me through that stress and to share the frustration with. And I was very conscious of getting older; I was well past 40 by then. I really wondered if I'd ever be able to adopt.


My daughter was profiled at an adoption event for children who were hard to place. I asked for the paperwork and I thought my social worker would say "no, with the cerebral palsy it'll be too much for you". But actually she said "maybe it'll be easier for you to deal with physical needs as a single adopter than with emotional ones". I felt I was being guided by her, and that she felt it was something I was capable of taking on.


My daughter's social worker came to visit me. In hindsight, I feel that perhaps they'd already made a decision. I wonder – of course I don't know – whether anybody else had been interested in her; she'd been in care for a long time. Were they desperate? I certainly was.


The last four years have been a massive struggle. To be honest, I think I was naive, though I do think there were aspects of what would be involved in caring for her that should have been discussed and weren't. I work full-time, for instance, and I'd never said I'd wanted to reduce my hours. If anybody knows what it's like to raise a disabled child – especially with all the cutbacks which mean you have to fight for everything – well, how any social worker could think that a single, full-time working person could be the right person to adopt a child with complex needs, it's just beyond me.


Although I returned to work full-time after my adoption leave, I now only work only three days a week. And that's not time off. It's time I spend battling to get appointments, attend meetings, fight for her statement to have enough hours of support agreed; in the end I had to apply to go to tribunal before that was resolved and she got the help needed so badly. It's mentally exhausting. And that's not even time I spend with her. I've ended up being a single adopter with a disabled child who has behavioural issues and very little support. Friends have dropped away and that's been incredibly upsetting.


I love my daughter and I'm never going to give up on her, but I feel I should not have been matched with her, for my own good and for her good. I'm shattered all the time. She's happy – she's a glass half full child. But I can't meet all her needs. With the experience they have of matching I think the social workers and the matching panel should have known better.


As told to Louise Tickle. Names and some identifying features have been changed.

Zoompad said...

Not wanting to knock social workers, I know there are some really good people who wok in social services, but whats happened is that paedophiles and human traffickers have wormed their way into this field of profession, and they are running child trafficking networks via the secret (therefore illegal) family courts, here in Staffordshire they have been homing in on disabled children, and using syndromes that were invented by American paedophiles in court, ie MSBP, to take these children away from their parents.

Colin Tucker who was part of the Lord Derviant rent oy scandal is involved in this network.

Zoompad said...

Rent Boy scandal, the computer skipped the letter b, the boys were being brought over from Thailand on false pretences, they thought they were going to be working in resturants, but once in Britain they were used as child prostitutes to the elite, Colin Tucker and his homosexual lover were running this scam

Zoompad said...

There are all sorts of people involved in this horrible scam, some are more guilty than others.

The adoptees, they're the ones who are being duped into accepting what are really stolen children. A lot of children in "care" actually have loving parents, the ones who are taken using PAS and MSBP, because those two syndromes were invented by American paedophiles

Zoompad said...

I may have been wrong about Elizabeth Butler Sloss. I watched the Assisted Dying Bill yesterday (it should be renamed Lord Falconers Mass Murder of Vulnerable People Bill) and to my utter astonishment she spoke out AGAINST it!

I didn't expect that, I thought she was a friend of Lord Falconer, and that she would speak out FOR it, so that took me by surprise.

I know she was at the Adam Street Gang place and is involved in secret (therefore illegal) family courts and ARK, but I think its not right to jump to conclusions about that. She may have covered up for her brother, but that doesn't necessarily mean she is activly involved in child abuse or child trafficking, she may genuinly not understand all that has been going on.

We need a proper investigation, and we need people like me, genuine victims of institutional abuse to be allowed to speak at it, and I have petitioned Teresa May to bring Judith Reisman to head the envestigation, as she is genuinly 100% against child abuse and she has spent decades investigating the Kinsey Institute.

Zoompad said...

I'd like to thank Baroness Campbell for speaking out against Falconers assisted murder bill yesterday, what a brave brave lady she is, thank you so much if you are reading this