Thursday, 20 January 2011

THE SELF DESTRUCTION OF THE JERSEY OLIGARCHY

FROM THE BLOG OF EX SENATOR STUART SYVRET

"Anonymous said...
Let me get this right

sumption is employed by the states of jersey to judge a case against the states of jersey and employees of SOJ

Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:11:00 GMT "




Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...
My claim is that I was unlawfully oppressed – by a civil service structure that was grossly incompetent in child protection – and which was responsible for a vast catalogue of child protection failures so common, they were almost routine, and that stretched back over decades.

The civil servants needed to oppress me in an attempt to prevent me exposing their failure.

I therefore need to show two things on the evidence:

1: That I was the victim of a conspiracy back in 2007.

2: That there was, indeed, a catalogue of gross failure by Jersey’s child “protection” apparatus.

Evidence for point-1:

The JCPC meeting.

Related e-mails.

The letter from Le Feuvre.

The fact it was faxed from Peter Crill House.

E-mail from a senior manager confirming it was Marnie Baudains who wrote the Le Feuvre letter.

Demonstrably untrue letter from Pollard to H & SS staff.

Alteration of meeting dates by the CoM, thus denying me due-process.

Phil Bailhache blocking publication of my ‘Ministerial Comments’.

File-note by Alison Fossey.

File-note by Graham Power.

Evidence for point-2:

The Sharp report.

The Kathy Bull report.

The illegal oppression of Simon Bellwood.

Various evidential documents that show Simon was unlawfully oppressed.

The ‘Grand-Prix” policy.

The actual experiences of some young men who were unlawfully abused via months of solitary confinement in Les Chenes.

The testimony of many, many different victims of Jersey’s child abuse disaster.

The Dylan Southern report.

The letter from Le Feuvre ‘thanking’ the Maguires.

The police chronology of the 1998 cover-up.

The police chronology of the 2008 cover-up.

The police assessment of the legal issues arising from the failure to prosecute the Maguires.

ACPO 1

ACPO 2

ACPO ¾

The Williamson report – and its weakness in contrast with the facts.

The Bridget Shaw report.

The Napier report.

The Howard League Report.

Graham Power's affidavit.

Lenny Harper's affidavit.

That’s just a quick run-through of some of the key evidence.

Stuart

Thursday, 20 January 2011 12:33:00 GMT

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Incredible isn't it?

The trouble is I won't be alive to witness victory against this stinking regime. But I will make damn sure I can do what I can, within a non-violent context, whilst I am alive to rid the citiziens of Jersey of their oppressive government.

They say that understanding comes when the need to understand arises. Well! How can I help show the ignorant what is, indeed, right under their noses but they don't see. Ordinary citizens who are totally unaware of the corrupt system.

I have met people in the supermarket who poke fun at the JEP (The unreadable rag) and complain about their States members but half of them don't know the half of it. It is fashionable to knock politicians and they are just following suit but doing nothing about their concerns. As Ex-Senator Syvret so correctly says 'you get the government you deserve'. But it is so hard to get a different group think in action. 800 years of oppression is hard to offload.

So if normal measures of non-violent protest are not working what next?

I sure do hope that Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret's road to Strasbourg is paved with gold (Something regarded as having great value and goodness. May he continue to have the support he needs to do his valuable job for the ordinary people of our island.

The Truth is Out but who is listening?

Zoompad said...

"The trouble is I won't be alive to witness victory against this stinking regime"

I pray to God that you will be! xx

Zoompad said...

MORE ABUSE FROM THE JERSEY HAUT DE LA GARENNE FARCE BLOG

PRETENDING TO POST CRAP IN MY NAME, USING MY WATERCOULUR PORTRAIT WITHOUT MY CONSENT

Zoompad said...
YUCK! No way, I wouldn't want to be seen out with this creepy looking pervo but give me Stuart anytime!

I do have principles you know!

Thanks for making me chuckle though :-0, happy new year Gazza and Team Farce x

Zoomy x

January 21, 2011

Zoompad said...

The way those idiots are bullying Rico Sorda is a badge of honour for Rico. It just shows how desperate these politicians are. Yes, some of those postings are by people who are running the Islan's administration!

HOW CAN ANYONE TAKE SERIOUSLY A SENATE THAT GOES ON TO SUCH A BLOG OF DOOM AND SQUALOR AND POSTS SUCH MALICIOUS SPITE AND SLANDER?

But, like the dung beetles, at least that blog has a purpose, because it is instrumental in showing what sort of crap is going on in that chamber.

Zoompad said...

Besides, I don't see any problem in a man using a dating agency to look for a lady of similar interests and age.

I do have a problem with grown men trawling round websites and public toilets looking for little twinky boys to bugger!

Ian Evans said...

DAVID ICKE on JON and ADRIAN

Zoompad said...

'FORUM MAN'
Firstly, let me make it clear that I am not criticising or condemning Internet forums. They can be a great source of interaction and information exchange by some very intelligent and aware people. But through this medium has emerged a mentality, what I call Forum Man, that we need to be aware of and, more than anything, Forum Man needs to be aware of.
I say 'Man' because from what I have seen this mentality is expressed mostly through the male mind, though certainly not exclusively. Forum Man sits at his computer hiding behind log-in names, often hurling abuse in all directions, and claims to be streetwise about life and world events while talking the most monumental bollocks ...
... 'Sovereign', bless him, also wheels out the headshaking mentality that I have experienced virtually the entire time I have been on this road. He says that I get programmes about me on the BBC (I don't, but fingers crossed) 'while other researchers get taken out'. I love this one. This is a step on even from the 'if you are well known you must be a front man for "them"'. Here we have reached the Twilight Zone in which to be really credible you must be dead.
These people, and they are extremely large in number, are not able to conceive of other forces at work intent on bringing down the walls of suppression and control because they are stuck firm in the conspiracy version of the victim mentality. Theirs is the world of the valiant hero who fought so bravely against all the odds with God, truth and justice on his side, but then was tragically taken out by the forces of evil, or the 'Feds', which is basically the same thing.
'Jaaaahn's dead, folks, what more proof do you need that he was right?'
'You still alive? You must be one of "them".'
It reminds me of the old ducking stool where they used to hold alleged witches under the water and if they drowned they were accepted not to have been a witch, but if they didn't die they were convicted. I think they call it Catch 22

Zoompad said...

I don't think this piece describes Jon and Adrien that well though. I think Jon and Adrien are just a couple of smelly chimpanzees that a bunch of very corrupt politicians are giving a few peanuts to, to hurl crap at people who have exposed their corruption.