Tuesday, 27 November 2012

I WON'T BE POSTING ON AANGIRFANS BLOG ANY MORE

"People who are sexually attracted to children often make the best teachers and girl-guide leaders and often look after the waifs and strays that families have abandoned."

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/we-need-gay-people.html

That is the reason why.

I do not want to associate myself with anyone who can write such utter blox.

I feel betrayed, reading that rubbish.

23 comments:

Zoompad said...

POSTED ON AANGIRFAN'S BLOG:

This is the last post I am going to make on your blog, and I am reposting it onto my own blog just in case you dont publish it.I feel disguasted and betrayed by this comment:

"People who are sexually attracted to children often make the best teachers and girl-guide leaders and often look after the waifs and strays that families have abandoned."

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/we-need-gay-people.html

That is a lie.

I don't want to be associated with your blog any more because of this, Aangirfan.

Carol A. Valentine said...

Hi Zoomie,

Did you see my comment about the same that I left on Aang in the early hours.

I am of a similar mind. Though I suspect something fishy is going on.

I have a few theories of my own.

I think the switch/hack/change (whatever it is) on Aangirfan must have happened around 26th November

I got a message on google from a Christisking

They were saying similar as are many others.

BTW - I sent an email at the beginning of the week but think it was intercepted or something because it is not in my sent/outbox.

Hope all is okay?

Carol x

Anonymous said...

me neither carol, the guy posts too many pix of children tied up and he recently posted a pic of (presumably) simulated child sex, which another commenter complained about. He'd have to spend a lot of time looking at such pix to post them. I think he may be a pedo pretending to be gay.

He refused to publish a couple of my responses which were non abusive. I only followed the blog the last few months and yeah, it seems like someone else, but he was probably pretending all along.

We all need to expect to encounter double agents and disinfo in 'conspiracy' sites. His site visitor stats are going to plummet, but who cares?

Zoompad said...

I don't know whats going on Aangirfan's site, which used to be good but now is really scary, but I can't post on a blogsite that is posting that sort of lie.

Its like the usual stuff that the Kinsey Institute brainwashers put out about everyone being a bit gay or a bit attracted to children, and that "free love" is a good thing.

I might be an old hippy type but I never liked that so called "free love" lie when I was a young girl, and I hate it even more now that I am older. I realise now that I am older and wiser that what drew me into the hippy movement initially was the wonderful music, some of which was inspired by the words of the Lord Jesus Christ. I liked the so called protest songs, learned to play some of them, Pete Seeger, Woody Guthrie etc, probably because I was hurting so much inside of me, because of the Pindown abuse, nothing seemed to make any sense, the films I like best, Ring of Bright Water, a man falling in love with a simpler and less stressful way of life, and the otter who led him to it, lovely things, that inspire the nobler side of mankind. The Appartment, that Jack Lemmon film, about a man's disgust with infidelity and using people for sex, thats another film that I like.

Aangirfans site used to be nice, and felt like someone with a noble and loving spirit was running it. It doesn't feel like that any more, I don't know what has happened to it, but I don't like it any more.

Zoompad said...

Carol, I did get an email from you, I haven't emailed you back, I felt a bit guilty because I haven't got round to doing that FOI request that I said I would yet. I have been feeling so stressed out, and so I have been limiting my computer time, and doing some nice relaxing stuff, I am doing my patchwork and making some nice christmas presents for people. I will do the FOI, but I think I just needed to look after my sanity, with some nice crafts and country walks, because I just get too stressed out and start crying. I still have had no response from my GP and its been a month now, and I find the way I am being treated very scary.

Zoompad said...

I had a look at Aangirfan's latest post.

Theres's a message for me there:

"Zoompad: Gays are my brothers and sisters."

What the writer is hinting about me by posting that I can only speculate on. It just seems like an accusation of "homophobia" to me.


Zoompad said...

"People who are sexually attracted to children often make the best teachers and girl-guide leaders and often look after the waifs and strays that families have abandoned."

What the blinking heck has gay people being someone's brothers and sisters to do with that comment?

Carol A. Valentine said...

I know exactly what you mean Zoomie. I think betrayed is actually an understatement.

I am bitterly disappointed.

People can disagree and yes we all do silly things sometimes that we regret. It is part of being human.

I know I am a bit too radical for many which is fine by me. i mean no harm by it but I am not a troublemaker i think people know that so to be singled out on that blog as were you and others too is just wrong.

Whoever is behind it, it makes no sense to turn on your audience. It makes me think something sinister has happened or that the blog was a sly ploy from the beginning.

As ever I have a few theories.

Perhaps we will never know.

The outright hypocrisy was starting to be exposed? Maybe readers and commentators were starting to get too close to the truth.

I also agree about many of the photos and pics - was this to program readers or to leave computer traces which could then be used later in some kind of reverse operation ore when they accuse genuine activists against abuse of having traces of images on their computers or of visiting 'suspicious' websites etc etc??

I don't want to get too carried away here but the recent Aangirfan postings speak for themselves.

I am still trying to work out whether the blogger changed or the editorial line of the blogger changed. Certainly small things like the number of typos on the blog posts increased recently. As did the number of obviously planted comments. The blog entries just in the last few days were also more personal and 'Aangirfan' revealed more personal information than was usual. The font at the top of todays posting is also smaller. The wording is slightly different. Who knows.

Aangirfan knew that I was rereading his posts from the very beginning..

Perhaps it is all well and good giving the little people somewhere to vent some spleen but suddenly it is unacceptable if they start looking like they are going to do something about the rotten situation.

I cannot help feeling that there is a deception and some manipulation going on.

Carol

Anonymous said...

Aangrifan output is feeling decidely off lately.

Recently reposts on the article 'HOW DO YOU PROVE A CONSPIRACY?' - "People who are sexually attracted to children often make the best teachers and girl-guide leaders and often look after the waifs and strays that families have abandoned."

Then comments 'My most inspiring teachers were all gay.' and follows with examples which are not relevant to the prior statement.

Neither mention sexual attraction to children. Both are about being gay or abusive to children. Abuse does not need to be sexual.

The statement was specifically concerning sexual attraction to children, so why respond in such a manner?

'Let's not turn this into a witch hunt for gays'... I seem to remember was a response by cameron recently to a question posed concerning child molesters in high places.

Deflection: verb
to turn or cause to turn aside from a course

Zoompad said...

I don't find you a bit too radical, you just seem like someone who really respects the Lord God to me.

I don't feel welcome in any church, because of people feeling happy to read one thing in the Bible then go away forget all about it.

Child abuse is awful, it is wicked. I don't think it's being radical to be absolutly 100% against it, I call that being consistant and true.

My dad wasn't perfect by any means, but he was a gentle man, in spite of being a manual factory worker, and he taught me to be kind. My dad was wary of the church and vicars, but now its all come out about priest abuse,its hardly surprising, I wish I had asked him why he didnt like vicars and churches while he was alive. My dad tried to teach me to be kind and gentle, and not take advantage of other people, the sort of stuff that is in the Bible that Jesus said to do, yet for some reason he really disliked churches and vicars. My dad didnt abuse me, but Stafford Social Services tried to blame him for the way I go abused, and that makes me feel really angry.

I dont think anyone who has the love of God in their hearts is too radical. We are supposed to hate evil, and its evil to abuse children. I feel sorry for people who abuse children because they will go to hell if they dont repent, its very clear that will happen in the Bible, and hell is a godless, terrible place that you can never escape from, like the Pindown home but a trillion times worse, but even though I feel sorry for them its no use me watering down the crime and p[retending it isn't evil when clearly it is.

Zoompad said...

"I also agree about many of the photos and pics - was this to program readers or to leave computer traces which could then be used later in some kind of reverse operation ore when they accuse genuine activists against abuse of having traces of images on their computers or of visiting 'suspicious' websites etc etc??"

I hope not, but I am not going to worry about that, put it in God's hands, because if someone is wicked enough to set such a snare I am quite sure that God will protect His own, just as he did when some bad men tried to set up Daniel, and look what happened to them!

Carol A. Valentine said...

Yes good point about Daniel Zoomie.

Have you read the most recent comments on Aangirfan?

I don't know whether to laugh or cry

I won't say anything more until you have seen what I mean.

My thoughts on the situation are starting to crystalise.

Best wishes,

Carol

Zoompad said...

Yes, I have just read it. I won't comment on the taken over Aangirfan blog any more, but I have posted a comment onto Dog's blog, to say quite firmly that I am not you.

Dog thinks I "need help" - thats the usual terminology for "needs whisking down to the nearest loony bin ASAP" Hmmm, I think I will pass on that one!

Zoompad said...

I wonder what the heck has happened to Aangirfan though. No way is that the same person who was blogging before, surely not?

Carol A. Valentine said...

Agreed - I think it is very fishy.

I have sent an email that goes into a bit more depth.

I would love to know your thoughts.

Carol

felix said...

Zoompad:
http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/anti-morsi.html
ANTI-MORSI PROTESTS
Posted by Anon at 3:58 PM No comments:


No comments??
No comment.

John Friend said...

I don't know what is up with aangirfan... that blog has always been a bit weird. Posts sometimes 5 or 6 times a day, all detailed info with pics, links, videos, etc. I just don't get it. But the style and content is the same, so I don't think anyone has been replaced.

I posted a comment on the "WE NEED GAY PEOPLE" post and he/she/them never published it. It dealt with the organized Jewish role in the promotion of homosexuality, pornography, sexual degeneracy, etc. with links to Jewish sources.

Carol A. Valentine said...

John - I think your point is exactly correct.

It is something that has been troubling me for some time now.

The rapidity of the postings as well as the in depth content though in one respect worthy of admiration, is also suspect.

I have posted on my blog about it.

I will not go into any more detail I think I have indicated enough.

It can be read at:

www.worldblogofblogs.blogspot.co.uk

I had to call it as i see it and gave him the right of reply first but sadly there was no reply.

That and the other patterns of behaviour that i and many others have noticed has sadly led me to the only one possible conclusion.

I along with many others I fear have to a certain extent been had.

That is not on its own a reason to doubt everything I have read there of course not - but I look upon the source in a different light now.

This is something i am writing with great reluctance and trepidation.

I have no malice and want my fears to be disproved though i feel that is unlikely in the long run.

Perhaps truthseeking is an unenviable task in which our fervour for the truth sets us up for a fall at times. Nevertheless it is important work and I hope our reward will come in the end.


Carol.

Roelfzema said...

Thank you very much for this post Zoompad. Aangirfan has so many posts, that it is hard to figure out what the purpose of that blogger is. I'm not sure though whether I will also go avoid Aangirfan, I still think that there is some interesting stories published there also.

When reading this post you refer to, I was waiting for the source, from where Aangirfan was quoting from. But the article ends without any source. That makes the impression, that Aangirfan wrote it. If he/she didn't, well, the article contains many lies that should be exposed.

That homosexuals would be more intelligent is a lie. The reason they have more success, is because homosexuals run the Vatican, but also, homosexuals do not have a family and therefor more time and money to invest in their career. Another very important reason for the success of homosexuals, is that young men can make a career as a lover of a successful person. It's the same as with woman, who agree to have sex with a producer, in order to get a role in a movie production, or other art productions and other fields of careers. Men have the same option with homosexual producers, and many actors are therefor bisexual or homosexual. having sex with the manager of a company, is how careers also in education put homosexuals in high offices, that have more money to spend because no family, that money is than invested in art an all kinda initiatives.

Putting such a lie in an article, as Aangirfan did, is very damaging. And for pedorasts, pedocriminals, they do not make better teachers, but are portrayed as better teachers. Teachers should be selected by the community, rather than some career opportunity, just as sheriffs should.

Zoompad said...

I changed my mind, I will post on Aangirfans blog sometimes, but with caution. I want to have my say, and I wont cut my nose off to spite my face!

Zoompad said...

The ones who make the best teachers of children are the ones who love God the most, I mean TRULY love God, not ones who pretend to but really are using religion as some sort of a weapon against their brothers and sisters on earth.

The Lord melts your heart when you truly truly love Him, when you truly truly let him into your heart, and then its impossible to want to hurt any small and vulnerable creature.

Paedophiles are selfish, they dont love children at all, they just want to rape them. Aangirfan is very very very wrong to say such a stupid thing as that.

Zoompad said...

Ok, so I did post something on Aangirfans blog a few days ago, I could not resist it, it was like waving a red rag to a bull!

Zoompad said...

After all, I am a woman and everyone knows women like to have the last word!