I don't know anything about his personal life, but I have read his biography on William Wilberforce, and it is excellent.
Why did William Hague choose to write a biography about this particular man, and them write about him in such a way that it is clear to anyone reading it that he greatly admires Wilberforce's passion to end slavery, which is a black mark against the whole human race?
I think William Hague must be quite a nice person, judging him from this book. Perhaps all this mudslinging about him is an attempt to gag him, same as all us other human rights campaigners (we are NOT anachists!) have been maliciously and slyly attacked - as Hollie and Anne Greig were, by that nasty piece of work, Greg Lance Watkins, pretending to be all pally and then stabbing them in the back and twisting the blade.
I think Guy Fawkes ought to leave the Hague family well alone, and stop all the nasty mud slinging. If Mr Hague has done anything wrong in his capacity as a politician, then of course it is in the public interest that people know about it, but all this stuff about is he homosexual or not is just nasty malicious mudslinging. It must be awful for Mrs Hague as well. He's said loud and clear that he is not not homosexual now, and even been forced to go into detail about why he has no children yet. Guy Fawkes and all his cronies ought to leave them alone. If Guy Fawkes wants to write on a subject that is really shocking and scandalous, and merets being written about in great detail, why does he not tale on Lard Falconer and the secret family court childstealing scandal? Falconer has plenty of juicy skeletons in his closet - but I suppose Guy Fawkes is too scared to death of the Scandalson mob to poke around that lot too much. I think Guy Fawkes is a coward!